Is pvp-practice-singleplayer-2-0.zip safe?
None of 66 antivirus engines detected the long-observed ZIP, and no threat-intelligence or static heuristic signal linked it to malware.
The ZIP drew no detections from 66 antivirus engines, including 18 tier-1 engines, and has existed in the dataset for more than nine years. No external threat-intelligence match or heuristic warning was found, though the archive lacks runtime analysis and should still be scanned after extraction.
01a139c69fab35cfbc…8dd99f8c4c96beRecommended next actions
Before opening or extracting
Open or extract it only when its sender or download source has been independently verified.
If you already opened or extracted it
Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
The ZIP drew no detections from 66 antivirus engines, including 18 tier-1 engines, and has existed in the dataset for more than nine years. No external threat-intelligence match or heuristic warning was found, though the archive lacks runtime analysis and should still be scanned after extraction.
No antivirus engine flagged the archive: 0 of 66 reported malicious or suspicious findings, with all 18 participating tier-1 engines reporting no detection. The file has been known for 3,327 days and appeared in seven submissions from seven sources, which reduces concern about an entirely new sample. Research feeds produced no MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, or YARAify match, and no heuristic rule fired. Code signing is not relevant to a ZIP archive, so its absence carries no negative weight. Runtime behavior was not observed, and no complete contacted-host reputation result is available. These limitations warrant ordinary caution when extracting files but do not outweigh the consistently negative static evidence.
What We Detected
None of 66 antivirus engines flagged this ZIP as malicious or suspicious. This includes 18 tier-1 engines such as Microsoft, Kaspersky, BitDefender, ESET-NOD32, Avast, and Fortinet. No engine family consensus, test-file label, or confirmed hacktool label was present.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox run is available, so execution behavior was not observed. The contacted-host cross-check was also not completed or saved, meaning no full network-reputation conclusion can be drawn. Static checks found no fired heuristics, brand mismatch, MalwareBazaar record, CIRCL match, or YARAify rule.
What To Do Now
Keep endpoint protection enabled and scan the extracted contents before opening them, because archive containers can hold files that require separate inspection. Obtain the archive from its official or expected source and avoid running unexpected executables or scripts inside it.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- behaviour=null, so the archive and any contained files were not observed executing.
- contactedHosts=null, meaning no complete host-reputation result is available.
- The evidence reflects file.lastAnalysisDate=2017-08-17, so it may not include newer signatures or current archive-content analysis.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/66 engines reported malicious or suspicious findings.
- engines.tier1ReportedClean=18 with engines.tier1Malicious=0.
- file.ageDays=3327 indicates a long observation history.
- externalIntel.malwareBazaar.hit=false and externalIntel.yaraify.ruleCount=0.
- triggeredHeuristics=[] and brandMismatch=null.
- behaviour=null: no completed runtime observation is available.
- contactedHosts=null: no complete host-reputation cross-check is available.
- file.lastAnalysisDate=2017-08-17: the recorded engine analysis is historical.
- ZIP archives can contain nested files requiring separate extraction-time scanning.
Keep endpoint protection enabled, scan the archive and each extracted file with current signatures, and open it only if it came from the expected source.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 66 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 0 / 66engines flagged
- 7sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
0 of 66 antivirus engines flagged the file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
No completed runtime observation is available for this file.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceRuntime coverageObserved at - 03
The hash has been submitted 7 times from 7 sources.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
0 of 66 engines flagged this file
View all 66 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- pvp-practice-singleplayer-2-0.zip
- Format
- ZIP
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 1.2 MB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 26, 2026, 10:25 PM UTC
01a139c69fab35cfbc0f8f0ab5d2976114fd827802bf7600b88dd99f8c4c96beSafety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.
- Recovery step 01
Open or extract it only when its sender or download source has been independently verified.
- Recovery step 02
A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.
- Recovery step 03
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is pvp-practice-singleplayer-2-0.zip safe?
What is pvp-practice-singleplayer-2-0.zip?
How many antivirus engines detected pvp-practice-singleplayer-2-0.zip?
What is the SHA-256 hash of pvp-practice-singleplayer-2-0.zip?
Is it safe to open or extract pvp-practice-singleplayer-2-0.zip?
How up to date is this analysis of pvp-practice-singleplayer-2-0.zip?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.