Threat LensFile scan report

Is grid.pdf safe?

Verdict
Safe

No antivirus engine detected this long-observed PDF, while one sandbox produced concerning technique mappings that lack malicious-verdict or network-reputation corroboration.

All 77 antivirus engines returned no detection, including 18 tier-1 engines, and the file has been observed since 2011. One sandbox mapped credential dumping, process injection, and data destruction techniques, but issued no malicious verdict; the two contacted IP addresses were not reputation-checked.

Open with normal care

Use an updated PDF reader and keep endpoint protection enabled. Verify the sender or download source if the document was unsolicited, particularly because the sandbox technique mappings and IP reputation remain unresolved.

Read the full analysis
Saved file evidenceAntivirus consensus
0of 77 flagged
Flagged 0No detection 77
Digital specimengrid.pdf05254dd9bed9a81d2c…02a91ae835e5d5
Size16.9 KB
Code signingNot applicable
SandboxRuntime complete
First seen15y ago
Evidence3 priority signals
0 of 77 antivirus engines flagged the file.

Recommended next actions

01

Before opening

Open it only when its sender or download source is one you independently trust.

02

If you already opened it

Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.

Chapter 02

Intelligence

The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.

MT AI Engine · Verdict analysis

The reasoning behind this verdict

This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.

75%Confidence
High
Analyst conclusion

All 77 antivirus engines returned no detection, including 18 tier-1 engines, and the file has been observed since 2011. One sandbox mapped credential dumping, process injection, and data destruction techniques, but issued no malicious verdict; the two contacted IP addresses were not reputation-checked.

Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
  • The T1003, T1055, and T1485 mappings are meaningful counter-signals despite the complete absence of antivirus detections.
  • Nine dropped children were inspected without a malicious result, but droppedChildren.rollup.unknown=9 means none received a confirmed benign verdict.
  • Direct-IP contacts to 18.213.11.84 and 92.123.124.167 cannot be characterized as benign because contactedHosts=null.

These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.

Recommended action

Use an updated PDF reader and keep endpoint protection enabled. Verify the sender or download source if the document was unsolicited, particularly because the sandbox technique mappings and IP reputation remain unresolved.

Scan transparency

Coverage & freshness

4 of 5 complete

Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.

  • Antivirus

    Complete

    0 of 77 engines flagged the file.

  • Sandbox

    Complete

    1 isolated runtime environment contributed observations.

  • Network

    Partial

    2 runtime contacts were observed without a completed reputation cross-check.

  • YARA

    Complete

    3 signature or behavior rules matched.

  • External intel

    Complete

    3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.

Chapter 03

Behavior

Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.

Runtime flight recorder

Capture complete
  • 1isolated sandbox run
  • 12MITRE ATT&CK techniques
  • 7spawned processes
  • 2network contacts
  • 40filesystem & mutex artifacts
Recorded behavior

Attack story

Runtime observations grouped by analysis stage. Arrows organize the stages; they do not claim chronology or causality.

ObservedDerived

7 recorded facts from one runtime window. Every fact remains independently traceable in Analyst mode.

Chapter 04

Detection & Forensics

Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.

Chapter 05

Safety & FAQ

Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.

What to do now

This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.

  1. Recovery step 01

    Open it only when its sender or download source is one you independently trust.

  2. Recovery step 02

    A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.

  3. Recovery step 03

    Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.

Safety FAQ

Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.

6 evidence-based answers
Is grid.pdf safe?
Evidence-based answer
grid.pdf appears safe. 0 of 77 antivirus engines flagged it. Open it only when its sender or download source is one you independently trust.
What is grid.pdf?
Evidence-based answer
grid.pdf is a document file, about 17 KB. Our analysis did not identify a verdict-driving threat signal. A file's name can be reused by different files, so we identify it by its cryptographic hash (below).
How many antivirus engines detected grid.pdf?
Evidence-based answer
None — 0 of 77 antivirus engines flagged grid.pdf. That's reassuring, though it is not proof that a file is safe, so we also weigh its behaviour, identity, and reputation.
What is the SHA-256 hash of grid.pdf?
Evidence-based answer
The SHA-256 hash of grid.pdf is 05254dd9bed9a81d2c9da60e40bfe77b89e6b757428cc363a802a91ae835e5d5, and its MD5 is 7f5cf7878aa0aa57e1d626f58a4ce49f. This hash is the file's unique fingerprint — two files with the same SHA-256 are identical. Use it to confirm you're looking at exactly this file (not just one with the same name) when comparing against antivirus databases or a download's published checksum.
Is it safe to open grid.pdf?
Evidence-based answer
Based on the recorded evidence, grid.pdf has a low observed risk. The important caveat is source: make sure you downloaded it from the official website or a trusted store, because attackers sometimes distribute malware-laced copies under a legitimate file's name. If your own antivirus flags it, verify the source and the exact hash before overriding the warning.
How up to date is this analysis of grid.pdf?
Evidence-based answer
This report reflects the scan run on September 9, 2026. Because a file's hash never changes, the identity of grid.pdf is fixed — but antivirus coverage improves over time, so a file that looks clean today can pick up detections later (and vice-versa). If you need the latest picture, MalwareTips staff can re-run the analysis from scratch.
Chapter 06

Community

Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.

The raw file is processed temporarily and is not retained after processing. Its hash and report are public and permanent, so the next person who checks the same file gets an instant answer. Unknown files may be submitted to VirusTotal for analysis. If you ran this file on your computer and are worried, scan your system with an up-to-date antivirus and change critical passwords from a different device.