Is Evicted_valorant_lde.zip safe?
No engine detected malware in this archive, but encryption and the absence of runtime analysis mean its extracted contents still warrant ordinary caution.
The archive produced no malicious or suspicious detections across 75 engines, including no tier-1 alerts, and external intelligence supplied no matching threat record. Because it is encrypted and was not executed in a sandbox, the embedded files were not conclusively assessed; an unsupported researcher comment alleging a stealer lowers confidence.
060353c0d833c3804d…a3504f8794f79fRecommended next actions
Before opening or extracting
Open or extract it only when its sender or download source has been independently verified.
If you already opened or extracted it
Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
The archive produced no malicious or suspicious detections across 75 engines, including no tier-1 alerts, and external intelligence supplied no matching threat record. Because it is encrypted and was not executed in a sandbox, the embedded files were not conclusively assessed; an unsupported researcher comment alleging a stealer lowers confidence.
Static scanning produced no malicious or suspicious detections across 75 engines, with all 17 tier-1 contributors free of alerts. No YARAify, MalwareBazaar, or CIRCL match corroborated a known threat. However, the ZIP is encrypted, so engines may not have inspected every embedded component. No completed runtime observation or comprehensive contacted-host reputation result is available. One zero-vote researcher annotation alleges Remus Stealer and command-and-control infrastructure, but no independent evidence in this payload corroborates that claim. The available evidence therefore supports a benign assessment of the archive itself, with reduced confidence until its contents are separately scanned.
What We Detected
None of 75 antivirus engines flagged the ZIP as malicious or suspicious, and engines.tier1Malicious=0. External checks also returned externalIntel.yaraify.ruleCount=0, externalIntel.malwareBazaar.hit=false, and externalIntel.circl.hit=false.
Threat Behavior
No completed runtime observation is available because behaviour=null, so execution, persistence, credential theft, and network activity were not observed. A complete host-reputation check is also unavailable because contactedHosts=null. One zero-vote community annotation names Remus Stealer and alleged command-and-control hosts, but this is not corroborated by the engines or external intelligence.
What To Do Now
Keep endpoint protection enabled. Extract the archive only in a controlled location, scan every extracted file separately, and do not run executables or scripts unless the archive came from an expected, trustworthy source.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- communityComments[1] identifies the archive as 'remus_stealer' and lists alleged command-and-control hosts; this unverified annotation conflicts with the otherwise detection-free static evidence.
- file.reputation=-11 is negative, although only 3 submissions from 3 sources are recorded and no corresponding malware detection is present.
- Because file.tags includes 'encrypted', the 0/75 result may reflect incomplete archive visibility rather than inspection of every embedded file.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/75 engines reported a malicious or suspicious result.
- engines.tier1Malicious=0 and engines.tier1ReportedClean=17.
- externalIntel.yaraify.ruleCount=0.
- externalIntel.malwareBazaar.hit=false and externalIntel.circl.hit=false.
- brandMismatch.detected is not present for this ZIP.
- The archive is encrypted, which can obstruct inspection of embedded files.
- No completed runtime observation is available.
- No complete contacted-host reputation result is available.
- file.reputation=-11 despite only 3 recorded submissions.
- A zero-vote community annotation alleges Remus Stealer and command-and-control hosts.
Keep endpoint protection enabled and scan every extracted item before opening it. If the archive was unsolicited or its password came from an untrusted source, delete it rather than executing its contents.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 0 / 75engines flagged
- 3sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
No completed runtime observation is available for this file.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceRuntime coverageObserved at - 03
The hash has been submitted 3 times from 3 sources.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
0 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- Evicted_valorant_lde.zip
- Format
- ZIP
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 10.6 MB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 21, 2026, 1:20 PM UTC
060353c0d833c3804d0ba56ea4a490507661ffc9c505f8a253a3504f8794f79fSafety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.
- Recovery step 01
Open or extract it only when its sender or download source has been independently verified.
- Recovery step 02
A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.
- Recovery step 03
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is Evicted_valorant_lde.zip safe?
What is Evicted_valorant_lde.zip?
How many antivirus engines detected Evicted_valorant_lde.zip?
What is the SHA-256 hash of Evicted_valorant_lde.zip?
Is it safe to open or extract Evicted_valorant_lde.zip?
How up to date is this analysis of Evicted_valorant_lde.zip?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.