File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is Case
Only Trapmine flagged this executable with a generic machine-learning label, while major and smaller engines found no threat and evidence from the test run supplied no…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Run it only if it came from the developer's own website or an official app store.
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
1 of 70 flagged
- Flagged 1
- No detection 69
- No result 5
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 5mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
4 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
One of the 70 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable, and that result came from a less reliable engine using a generic machine-learning label. No higher-confidence engine identified malware, and the combined sandbox summary recorded no malicious verdict, named injection target, persistence, or file it created.
Trapmine was the only one of the 70 antivirus engines that checked it to flag the file, using a generic machine-learning score rather than a named malware family. None of the major or smaller engines identified a threat, making the isolated detection likely to be a false positive. The combined sandbox summary contains no malicious verdict, high-risk technique, named injection target, persistence change, or dropped file. The executable is not packed, and its code sections do not show unusually high entropy. Confidence is moderated because the file is unsigned, has only four known submitters, and was not examined by our static analysis.
What We Detected
Trapmine alone flagged the executable with a generic machine-learning score.
Threat Behavior
The combined sandbox summary recorded no malicious verdict, high-risk technique, named process-injection target, persistence indicator, or file it created. The sole recorded network address was identified as analysis-environment background traffic, not sample activity. No complete host-reputation check was available.
What To Do Now
The isolated detection is most consistent with a false positive. Because the executable is unsigned and not broadly submitted, obtain it from its expected source, keep security software enabled, and rescan if its origin or behaviour is uncertain.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- The executable is unsigned, so its publisher cannot be authenticated.
- Only four distinct sources submitted the file, which is not broad prevalence.
- Our static analysis was unavailable, and no complete contacted-host reputation result is available.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- No major or smaller antivirus engine flagged the file.
- The combined sandbox summary recorded no malicious verdict or high-risk behaviour.
- No process-injection target, persistence indicator, or file it created was observed.
- The executable does not appear packed and has no unusually high-entropy code sections.
- The executable is unsigned, so there is no authenticated publisher identity.
- It has been submitted by only four distinct sources.
- Trapmine reported a generic machine-learning suspicion.
- Our static analysis and a complete host-reputation check were not available.
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 6sandbox rule tags
- 1spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 0filesystem & mutex artifacts
Includes 6 mapped techniques and every process, file, registry and network entry.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
1 of the 70 antivirus engines that checked it flags it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 1
The saved verdict treats these detections as likely false positives.
- Trapminesuspicious.low.ml.score
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Jun 27, 2026, 7:36 PM UTC
- SHA-256
0603b790d8c8db731b6169a053f36c1f0c7be5d97c97245ed540239f68fce09c- SHA-1
078cdf3e582917dde6145c89144278f7ab7945fc- MD5
a8c35ffaf42e8d555f678525ceba9a86
About this file
CaseCracker3.exe is a Win32 EXE file of 666.6 kB.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 666.6 kB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- May 14, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 4 distinct sourcesRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 5.83 of 8
First scanned Updated
Verdict history
- Not fully confirmed
- Safeafter a re-check of the saved evidence
Ratings change when antivirus engines, our checks or MalwareTips staff learn more about a file.
Includes every engine result (75), PE section entropy and packers and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is CaseCracker3.exe safe?
What is CaseCracker3.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected CaseCracker3.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of CaseCracker3.exe?
Is it safe to run CaseCracker3.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of CaseCracker3.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.