File scan report
Verdict Suspicious
Is yepestein- client V2 (1). jar safe? Treat it as suspicious.
This Java archive was flagged by none of the 45 antivirus engines that checked it, but one sandbox run judged it a trojan while another found it clean, leaving the picture…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Why Suspicious? One sandbox test run rated it malicious while another found nothing; nothing else confirms it.
Limited evidence · One sign points to a problem; nothing else confirms it.
Only run this Java application if it comes from a trusted source you expected; otherwise avoid it and rescan later, keeping your security software enabled.
What to do now4 steps
Some signs point to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful. Treat it with caution.
What to do
Don't open or run it unless you're sure where it came from.
Check where you got it: an unexpected attachment, a link someone sent you or a re-upload is a red flag.
If you can't confirm where it came from, delete it. If you need the program, download it again from the publisher's own website.
If you already opened or ran it
Stop using it, run a full scan with your antivirus and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts.
Not sure what to do?
Ask the MalwareTips community before you run it. If you already ran it, follow the cleanup guide.
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
0 of 45 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 45
- No result 30
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Completed
- First seen 15d ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
4 points against it and 3 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
One sandbox run labelled it a trojan while another run came back clean, and nothing else confirms the malicious result. Several leading engines also timed out on this large file, so we cannot make a confident call either way.
None of the 45 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, and eight major antivirus engines that completed a scan reported it clean. Several other major engines timed out or failed on this 32 MB archive, so part of the major opinion is missing. The sandbox runs disagree: one returned a trojan label and another returned clean. No injected process, malicious network contact, malicious dropped file or public malware-database listing supports the malicious run. The sample does check its environment for debuggers and reads the CPU name, which is common in games and launchers but also in evasive malware.
What We Detected
This Java archive is about 32 MB and was first seen on Oct 10, 2026, with 83 distinct submitters. None of the 45 antivirus engines that checked it flagged it, though several major antivirus engines timed out or failed on it. No public malware-database or community YARA rule matched.
Threat Behavior
The sandbox runs split: one labelled the sample a trojan and another found it clean. The recorded processes are Java launching the archive, including one run that starts a second Java archive through the command prompt. No injection into another process was recorded, and the only network contact was background traffic. The sample checks for debuggers and reads the CPU name, which is ordinary in games and launchers but also used by malware to evade analysis.
What To Do Now
Run this file only if you obtained it from a source you trust and expected this application. If in doubt, keep your antivirus enabled, avoid running it on a machine holding sensitive accounts, and rescan it later as more engines complete their analysis.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- One sandbox run labelled the file a trojan, and the sample's tags note debugger-environment and CPU-name checks, which some malware uses to evade analysis.
- Several major antivirus engines, including Kaspersky, ESET and BitDefender, timed out or failed on this large archive, so their opinion is missing.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 45 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file.
- Another sandbox run found the file clean, with no process injection recorded.
- No public malware-database or community malware-rule matches.
- One sandbox run labelled the file a trojan.
- The sample checks for debugging environments and reads the CPU name, a pattern sometimes used to evade analysis.
- Several major antivirus engines could not finish scanning this large archive.
- The file is recent, first seen on Oct 10, 2026.
6 sources checked · all complete. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in 4 isolated tests; 1 test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 4isolated sandbox runs
- 14sandbox rule tags
- 4spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 11filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Contains packed or scrambled code that is harder to inspect (common in installers too).
Moderate concern: Ran commands or a script on the test computer.
Moderate concern: Hid files or windows on the test computer.
Note: Read basic details of the test computer, such as its Windows version.
Note: Loaded extra code modules while running.
Note: Checked which security software was installed on the test computer.
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as code injection, but no injected program was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as downloading a file, but no download was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as changing how Windows loads code; nothing confirms it.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 5: FileSeen in the test run
yepestein-clientV2 (1).jar
0c1ba647bd016fe8e3b54356179cfe7d64ddef7f3c42f791fb977f19ecf8b520
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
javaw.exe
"C:\Program Files\Java\jre-1.8\bin\javaw.exe" -jar "C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\sample.jar"
Test run - Evidence 3 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
cmd.exe
C:\Windows\SysWOW64\cmd.exe C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe /c ""C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.8.0_441\bin\java.exe" -jar "C:\Users\user\Desktop\runtime.jar""
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Files
Created or changed
- Evidence 4 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
3352
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_<USER>\3352
Test run - Evidence 5 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
3903daac9bc4a3b7.timestamp
C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage\3903daac9bc4a3b7.timestamp
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
5 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
What this file did when executed
This file was detonated in 4 sandboxes and the results were split: 1 returned "malicious" and 1 returned "clean".
Sandbox verdicts
2- VT: MALWARE, TROJANmalicious
- VT: CLEANclean
Techniques observed in the sandbox
14MITRE ATT&CK techniques the sandbox mapped. Highlighted ones are rare in normal software; the others are common in legitimate programs too.
- T1027· Obfuscated code
- T1055· Process injection
- T1059· Runs commands
- T1074
- T1082· System recon
- T1105· Network file transfer
- T1106
- T1129· Loads modules
- T1202
- T1518.001· Checks your AV
- T1564· Hides artifacts
- T1564.001· Hides artifacts
- T1564.003· Hides artifacts
- T1574· Execution hijack
Observed activity
Processes started
4Programs the file ran, with their command lines.
javaw.exe"C:\Program Files\Java\jre-1.8\bin\javaw.exe" -jar "C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\sample.jar"cmd.exeC:\Windows\SysWOW64\cmd.exe C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe /c ""C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.8.0_441\bin\java.exe" -jar "C:\Users\user\Desktop\runtime.jar""java.exe"C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.8.0_441\bin\java.exe" -jar "C:\Users\user\Desktop\runtime.jar"java/usr/bin/java -jar /tmp/sample.jar
Files
11Files the file created, changed or deleted.
- Written
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_<USER>\3352 - Written
C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage\3903daac9bc4a3b7.timestamp - Written
C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage\17dfc292991c8786.timestamp - Written
C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_user - Written
C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_user\6924 - Written
\Device\ConDrv
Show all 11 entries for files
- Written
\Device\ConDrv\\Connect - Written
/proc/3575/coredump_filter - Written
/tmp/hsperfdata_root/3575 - Deleted
C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_user\4916 - Deleted
/tmp/hsperfdata_root/3575
Sandbox background — not the file
3The analysis machine's own processes and connections, recorded in every run.
- VM process
icacls.exeC:\Windows\system32\icacls.exe C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage /grant "everyone":(OI)(CI)M - VM process
conhost.exeC:\Windows\System32\conhost.exe C:\Windows\system32\conhost.exe 0xffffffff -ForceV1 - VM host
cl-glcb907925.gcdn.co
Files this sample writes at runtime
This file drops 3 children at runtime. None are currently flagged malicious in our cache. 3 have no saved verdict and were not checked; that is missing coverage, not a finding.
- f561b6d654b91393bce5…01d2cdNot checkedno saved verdict
- f10b57dd4839531f3dab…750ffcNot checkedno saved verdict
- 2663c8e554adb49078b5…f96a48Not checkedno saved verdict
Chapter 04
Technical details
None of the 45 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · all complete. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 22, 2026, 2:39 PM UTC
- SHA-256
0c1ba647bd016fe8e3b54356179cfe7d64ddef7f3c42f791fb977f19ecf8b520- SHA-1
272e918944b151a1aece1159467b37e5d52a592e- MD5
4d607c2a2e1823b59561593ac1ed6d82
About this file
yepestein-clientV2 (1).jar is a JAR file of 32.4 MB.
- Type and size
- JAR · 32.4 MB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Oct 10, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 83 distinct sources
First scanned
Antivirus consensus
0 of 45 engines flagged this file
30 of the 75 engines returned no result for this file (file type not supported, or the scan did not finish), so they did not check it.
- Tier-18 engines0flagged
- Tier-228 engines0flagged
- Low-trust9 engines0flagged
View all 75 engine results
- AcronisClean
- AhnLab-V3Clean
- AlibabaClean
- alibabacloudClean
- ALYacClean
- Antiy-AVLClean
- APEXNo result
- ArcabitNo result
- AvastNo result
- Avast-MobileClean
- AVGNo result
- AviraClean
- BitDefenderNo result
- BitDefenderFalxNo result
- BkavNo result
- CAT-QuickHealClean
- ClamAVClean
- CMCClean
- CrowdStrikeClean
- CTXClean
- CylanceNo result
- CynetClean
- DeepInstinctNo result
- DrWebClean
- ElasticNo result
- EmsisoftClean
- ESET-NOD32No result
- F-SecureClean
- FortinetClean
- GDataNo result
- GoogleNo result
- GridinsoftClean
- huorongClean
- IkarusClean
- JiangminNo result
- K7AntiVirusClean
- K7GWClean
- KasperskyNo result
- KingsoftClean
- LionicClean
- MalwarebytesClean
- MaxSecureClean
- McAfeeDClean
- MicrosoftClean
- MicroWorld-eScanNo result
- NANO-AntivirusClean
- PaloaltoNo result
- PandaNo result
- RisingNo result
- SangforClean
- SentinelOneClean
- SkyhighNo result
- SophosNo result
- SUPERAntiSpywareClean
- SymantecClean
- SymantecMobileInsightNo result
- TACHYONClean
- tehtrisNo result
- TencentClean
- TrapmineNo result
- TrellixENSNo result
- TrendMicroNo result
- TrendMicro-HouseCallNo result
- TrustlookClean
- VaristClean
- VBA32No result
- VIPREClean
- VirITClean
- ViRobotClean
- WebrootClean
- XcitiumNo result
- YandexClean
- ZillyaNo result
- ZoneAlarmClean
- ZonerClean
Signatures and behavior heuristics
Low-severity pattern matches — worth noting but not on their own cause for alarm.
VirusTotal's sandbox summary maps this run to MITRE T1055 (Process Injection), but no injected process of the sample's own was recorded (the analysis VM's own WMI adapter, crash handlers and Chrome updater are not counted). VirusTotal maps T1055 on about half of all files no engine flags, so the mapping alone is not evidence of injection.
EvidenceT1055 (sandbox MITRE mapping)
How widely this file has been seen
Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.
Chapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is yepestein-clientV2 (1).jar safe, or is it malware?
What is yepestein-clientV2 (1).jar?
How many antivirus engines detected yepestein-clientV2 (1).jar?
What should I do if I already opened or ran yepestein-clientV2 (1).jar?
What is the SHA-256 hash of yepestein-clientV2 (1).jar?
How up to date is this analysis of yepestein-clientV2 (1).jar?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.