Safe
Two low-trust engines flagged a brand-new unsigned DLL while all 17 tier-1 engines and sandbox reported clean.
0f7df37ab0df0eb435…7a7de580cbThe verdict, reasoned out.
Not a rules engine. The MT AI Engine reads every signal we collected, weighs them against history, and commits to an answer.
The detection pattern matches the classic low-trust-only false-positive shape with zero tier-1 malicious detections. Sandbox execution produced only ambient techniques and no malicious verdict. Absence of any external intelligence hits, dropped children, or contacted malicious hosts further supports a clean assessment despite the file's rarity and unsigned status.
Each signal cites a concrete token from the evidence the arbiter saw — engine name, MITRE technique, signer string, or an exact count.
engines.onlyLowTrustFlagging=true with tier1Malicious=0 (Bkav, Cynet low_trust only)
signing.signed=false and prevalence.classification=rare_new (1 submitter, ageDays=0)
behaviour.hasMaliciousSandboxVerdict=false and contactedHosts.maliciousHosts.length=0
filenameAnalysis.hasNumericVersion=true but no looksLikeSecuritySoftware or brandMismatch
- Zero tier-1 malicious detections
- Clean sandbox verdict
- No network activity or dropped children
- Unsigned and brand new (rare_new, 0 days old)
- Two low-trust engine detections
Proceed with normal caution for an unsigned new DLL; the low-trust detections are likely false positives given the tier-1 silence and clean behaviour.
1 contradiction resolved by the scoring engine
What this file did when executed
This file was detonated in 1 sandbox and its runtime behaviour was observed.
Adversary techniques mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
- \Device\ConDrv\\Connect
2 detections across 74 engines
Section entropy & packers
Section-level entropy and packer detection from the PE header. Nothing suspicious here — entropy is within the normal range for unpacked code.
How often this file shows up in the wild
Barely seen in the wild and first surfaced recently. This is the footprint of targeted malware the AV industry hasn't signatured yet — extra scrutiny is warranted.
Forensic fingerprint
- File name
- EMod Beta V2.3.dll
- Size
- 5.91 MB
- MIME type
- (unknown)
- Detected type
- Win32 DLL
- SHA-256
- 0f7df37ab0df0eb43538e344e41fd3871c506ad72d23167e482bda7a7de580cb
- MD5
- 8749204a978b4d0ebff343203b406415
- SHA-1
- 853e1619c76421fcae7977803130874ddbf9cfb1
- PE imphash
- aa8834dd06694c9a0062fd14953318db
- First seen (VT)
- 7/11/2026, 11:33:54 PM
- Last analysis (VT)
- 7/11/2026, 11:33:54 PM
- First scan (MalwareTips)
- 7/11/2026, 11:40:55 PM
- Last scan (MalwareTips)
- 7/11/2026, 11:40:55 PM
Safety FAQ
Common questions about EMod Beta V2.3.dll, answered from the scan data above.
- EMod Beta V2.3.dll appears safe. 72 of 74 antivirus engines report it clean, with only 2 low-confidence detections that read as false positives. As a habit, only run files you downloaded from the official source, since attackers sometimes distribute trojanised copies of legitimate software under the same name.
- EMod Beta V2.3.dll is a Windows executable program, about 5.9 MB. Our analysis found no threat indicators for it. A file's name can be reused by different files, so we identify it by its cryptographic hash (below).
- 2 of 74 antivirus engines flagged EMod Beta V2.3.dll, 2 of them as outright malicious. A small number of detections can include false positives, so we weigh which engines flagged it and what else the file does, not just the raw count.
- The SHA-256 hash of EMod Beta V2.3.dll is 0f7df37ab0df0eb43538e344e41fd3871c506ad72d23167e482bda7a7de580cb, and its MD5 is 8749204a978b4d0ebff343203b406415. This hash is the file's unique fingerprint — two files with the same SHA-256 are identical. Use it to confirm you're looking at exactly this file (not just one with the same name) when comparing against antivirus databases or a download's published checksum.
- Based on this scan, yes — EMod Beta V2.3.dll shows no threat indicators. The important caveat is source: make sure you downloaded it from the official website or a trusted store, because attackers sometimes distribute malware-laced copies under a legitimate file's name. If your own antivirus flags it while we report it clean, that is most often a false positive, but verify the source before overriding your antivirus.
- This report reflects the scan run on July 11, 2026. Because a file's hash never changes, the identity of EMod Beta V2.3.dll is fixed — but antivirus coverage improves over time, so a file that looks clean today can pick up detections later (and vice-versa). If you need the latest picture, MalwareTips staff can re-run the analysis from scratch.
Reviews & malware reports(0)
Tell the community what you saw. Tag the sample — Trojan, Adware, False Positive — and share what the file did on your system. Your report helps confirm or dispute the AV verdict.