Threat LensFile scan report

Is Designing Data-Intensive Applications (Martin Kleppmann) (z-library.sk, 1lib.sk, z-lib.sk).pdf safe?

Verdict
Safe

No antivirus engine detected the long-established PDF, while concerning sandbox technique mappings remain uncorroborated and may reflect reader or environment activity.

All 75 antivirus engines produced no malicious or suspicious detection, including 17 tier-1 engines, and the PDF has circulated widely since 2022. One sandbox mapped activity to credential access, injection, and file destruction techniques, but issued no malicious verdict; incomplete host coverage prevents treating the network activity as fully cleared.

Open with normal care

Use an updated, protected PDF reader and keep endpoint protection enabled. Prefer an authorized source if the document was downloaded from an untrusted library or file-sharing site.

Read the full analysis
Saved file evidenceAntivirus consensus
0of 75 flagged
Flagged 0No detection 75
Digital specimenDesigning Data-Intensive Applications (Martin Kleppmann) (z-library.sk, 1lib.sk, z-lib.sk).pdf1186eaa1d12ade984f…a04265e0129944
Size23.3 MB
Code signingNot applicable
SandboxRuntime complete
First seen4y ago
Evidence3 priority signals
0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file.

Recommended next actions

01

Before opening

Open it only when its sender or download source is one you independently trust.

02

If you already opened it

Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.

Chapter 02

Intelligence

The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.

MT AI Engine · Verdict analysis

The reasoning behind this verdict

This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.

78%Confidence
High
Analyst conclusion

All 75 antivirus engines produced no malicious or suspicious detection, including 17 tier-1 engines, and the PDF has circulated widely since 2022. One sandbox mapped activity to credential access, injection, and file destruction techniques, but issued no malicious verdict; incomplete host coverage prevents treating the network activity as fully cleared.

Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
  • The sandbox mapped activity to T1003, T1055, and T1485, including an LSASS-related credential-dumping heuristic; these are meaningful counter-signals despite lacking engine or sandbox-verdict corroboration.
  • contactedHosts.inspected=3 is incomplete relative to the observed IP and URL contacts, so the available no complete contacted-host reputation result was available networking.
  • The PDF carries file.tags including file-embedded, autoaction, detect-debug-environment, and direct-cpu-clock-access, which merit caution even though no engine detected a payload.

These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.

Recommended action

Use an updated, protected PDF reader and keep endpoint protection enabled. Prefer an authorized source if the document was downloaded from an untrusted library or file-sharing site.

Scan transparency

Coverage & freshness

4 of 5 complete

Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.

  • Antivirus

    Complete

    0 of 75 engines flagged the file.

  • Sandbox

    Complete

    1 isolated runtime environment contributed observations.

  • Network

    Partial

    3 of 23 contacted hosts were cross-checked; coverage is incomplete.

  • YARA

    Complete

    3 signature or behavior rules matched.

  • External intel

    Complete

    3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.

Chapter 03

Behavior

Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.

Runtime flight recorder

Capture complete
  • 1isolated sandbox run
  • 20MITRE ATT&CK techniques
  • 15spawned processes
  • 23network contacts
  • 40filesystem & mutex artifacts
Recorded behavior

Attack story

Runtime observations grouped by analysis stage. Arrows organize the stages; they do not claim chronology or causality.

ObservedDerived

7 recorded facts from one runtime window. Every fact remains independently traceable in Analyst mode.

Chapter 04

Detection & Forensics

Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.

Chapter 05

Safety & FAQ

Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.

What to do now

This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.

  1. Recovery step 01

    Open it only when its sender or download source is one you independently trust.

  2. Recovery step 02

    A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.

  3. Recovery step 03

    Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.

Safety FAQ

Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.

6 evidence-based answers
Is this file safe?
Evidence-based answer
Designing Data-Intensive Applications (Martin Kleppmann) (z-library.sk, 1lib.sk, z-lib.sk).pdf appears safe. 0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged it. Open it only when its sender or download source is one you independently trust.
What is this file?
Evidence-based answer
Designing Data-Intensive Applications (Martin Kleppmann) (z-library.sk, 1lib.sk, z-lib.sk).pdf is a document file, about 23.3 MB. Our analysis did not identify a verdict-driving threat signal. A file's name can be reused by different files, so we identify it by its cryptographic hash (below).
How many antivirus engines detected this file?
Evidence-based answer
None — 0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged Designing Data-Intensive Applications (Martin Kleppmann) (z-library.sk, 1lib.sk, z-lib.sk).pdf. That's reassuring, though it is not proof that a file is safe, so we also weigh its behaviour, identity, and reputation.
What is the SHA-256 hash of this file?
Evidence-based answer
The SHA-256 hash of Designing Data-Intensive Applications (Martin Kleppmann) (z-library.sk, 1lib.sk, z-lib.sk).pdf is 1186eaa1d12ade984f9007f4eba19c6f3a64ba19cd34fee710a04265e0129944, and its MD5 is c43cd3e5d9edfe0ede38e44850326b56. This hash is the file's unique fingerprint — two files with the same SHA-256 are identical. Use it to confirm you're looking at exactly this file (not just one with the same name) when comparing against antivirus databases or a download's published checksum.
Is it safe to open this file?
Evidence-based answer
Based on the recorded evidence, Designing Data-Intensive Applications (Martin Kleppmann) (z-library.sk, 1lib.sk, z-lib.sk).pdf has a low observed risk. The important caveat is source: make sure you downloaded it from the official website or a trusted store, because attackers sometimes distribute malware-laced copies under a legitimate file's name. If your own antivirus flags it, verify the source and the exact hash before overriding the warning.
How up to date is this analysis of this file?
Evidence-based answer
This report reflects the scan run on September 15, 2026. Because a file's hash never changes, the identity of Designing Data-Intensive Applications (Martin Kleppmann) (z-library.sk, 1lib.sk, z-lib.sk).pdf is fixed — but antivirus coverage improves over time, so a file that looks clean today can pick up detections later (and vice-versa). If you need the latest picture, MalwareTips staff can re-run the analysis from scratch.
Chapter 06

Community

Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.

The raw file is processed temporarily and is not retained after processing. Its hash and report are public and permanent, so the next person who checks the same file gets an instant answer. Unknown files may be submitted to VirusTotal for analysis. If you ran this file on your computer and are worried, scan your system with an up-to-date antivirus and change critical passwords from a different device.