File scan report
Verdict Suspicious
Is setup. exe safe? Treat it as suspicious.
Unsigned Inno Setup installer that engines label as a cracked or repacked software package; 3 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flag it, and a sandbox run returned…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Why Suspicious? 3 antivirus engines flag it and a sandbox test run rated it as risky.
Moderate evidence · More than one sign points to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful.
Do not run this cracked installer; get the software from its official source. If it was already run, keep protection enabled and perform a full system scan.
What to do now4 steps
Some signs point to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful. Treat it with caution.
What to do
Don't install it unless you're sure where it came from.
Check where you got it: an unexpected attachment, a link someone sent you or a re-upload is a red flag.
If you can't confirm where it came from, delete it. If you need the program, download it again from the publisher's own website.
If you already installed it
Stop using it, run a full scan with your antivirus and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts.
Not sure what to do?
Ask the MalwareTips community before you run it. If you already ran it, follow the cleanup guide.
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
3 of 71 flagged
- Flagged 3
- No detection 68
- No result 4
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 11mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
5 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This installer looks like a repacked or cracked software package. 3 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flag it with crack and riskware labels, including one major antivirus engine. Our sandbox runs flagged it as malicious, but recorded only installer-style activity with no named injection target. Cracked installers are a common route for bundled unwanted or harmful software.
GData, Malwarebytes and Webroot flag the file, and their labels describe cracked or repacked software rather than a specific malware family. The file is unsigned and carries no publisher identity. Sandbox execution shows an Inno Setup chain extracting unpacker components such as ISDone.dll and a lollypop decompressor, typical of game and software repacks. A malicious sandbox verdict was recorded, but no high-risk technique or injection target backs it. The file's wide distribution and the absence of public malware-database or rule hits argue against a stealer or trojan, while the crack labeling keeps the risk real.
What We Detected
3 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flag this unsigned installer: GData (generic trojan heuristic), Malwarebytes (cracked-software riskware) and Webroot (repacked riskware). No family is named, and it has no public malware-database or community rule matches.
Threat Behavior
Across the sandbox runs, the installer launches a standard Inno Setup helper and extracts repack unpacker libraries and a decompression tool. One sandbox verdict was malicious, but no process injection target, persistence or suspicious network contact was recorded beyond a Microsoft short-link host. The overall shape matches a cracked or repacked software installer.
What To Do Now
Avoid running cracked or repacked installers from unofficial sources. Obtain the software from its official vendor, and keep your antivirus enabled and scan any system where this was run.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- A sandbox run returned malicious and no run contradicted it, so hidden payload behaviour cannot be fully excluded even though no high-risk technique or injection target was recorded.
- The file is widely submitted (over 600 sources over nearly a year) with only 3 detections. That fits a common repacked game or software installer rather than a stealer or trojan.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- Only 3 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flag it
- Widely submitted by over 600 sources across nearly a year
- No high-risk techniques or process injection targets were recorded
- No public malware-database or community rule matches
- Engines label the file as cracked or repacked software
- One major antivirus engine flags it with a generic trojan detection
- A sandbox run returned a malicious verdict
- The installer is unsigned, so no publisher is identified
- It extracts repack unpacker components commonly used in pirated software
6 sources checked · all complete. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in 6 isolated tests; 1 test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 6isolated sandbox runs
- 16sandbox rule tags
- 8spawned processes
- 1network contact
- 25filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Contains packed or scrambled code that is harder to inspect (common in installers too).
Moderate concern: Ran commands or a script on the test computer.
Moderate concern: Checked whether it was running on a test computer.
Note: Read the user name of the test computer.
Note: Talked to servers over the internet during the test run.
Note: Read basic details of the test computer, such as its Windows version.
Note: Looked through folders on the test computer (most installers do this).
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as code injection, but no injected program was recorded.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 6: FileSeen in the test run
setup.exe
15c1b532a55475cc93e05c75b9cc4362ea0b230a57f9019b8da52960903a0c43
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 6: ProcessSeen in the test run
setup.exe
"C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\setup.exe"
Test run - Evidence 3 of 6: ProcessSeen in the test run
setup.tmp
"C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\is-NOV5Q.tmp\setup.tmp" /SL5="$1C0074,5651573,140800,C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\setup.exe"
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Files
Created or changed
- Evidence 4 of 6: Written fileSeen in the test run
setup.tmp
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\is-NOV5Q.tmp\setup.tmp
Test run - Evidence 5 of 6: Written fileSeen in the test run
_setup64.tmp
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\is-UG6HL.tmp\_isetup\_setup64.tmp
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 1
Network
Hosts contacted
- Evidence 6 of 6: Contacted hostWorked out from other results
aka.ms
Older reputation report (safe), not counted as current evidence.
Contacted-host cross-check
6 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
Includes the sandbox verdicts, 16 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 10 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
3 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · all complete. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 3
- GData (major engine)Generic.Trojan.PSEB.QWW5J3
- MalwarebytesRiskWare.Crack
- WebrootWin.Riskware.Repack
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 21, 2026, 8:45 AM UTC
- SHA-256
15c1b532a55475cc93e05c75b9cc4362ea0b230a57f9019b8da52960903a0c43- SHA-1
a001b3fc0c6e60c6f35753c6960d460141591e1b- MD5
5e784411ed9fa0d1b2a6728e1bff569a
About this file
setup.exe says it is Kingdom Come: Deliverance II Setup (Kingdom Come: Deliverance II), 6.2 MB.
- Claims to be
- Kingdom Come: Deliverance II Setup (Kingdom Come: Deliverance II)From the file's own version information, written by whoever built it.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 6.2 MB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Nov 14, 2025On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 643 distinct sources
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 5.55 of 8
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), 1 matched signature rule, PE section entropy and packers and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is setup.exe safe, or is it malware?
What is setup.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected setup.exe?
I already downloaded and installed setup.exe — what should I do?
What is the SHA-256 hash of setup.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of setup.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.