Is polar_av_6.0.1.rar safe?
New unsigned RAR with only two low-trust engine flags and zero tier-1 or behavioral signals.
The file shows only low-trust detections from DeepInstinct and MaxSecure with no tier-1 consensus or other malicious indicators. This matches the classic false-positive pattern for low-trust-only flagging on new rare files. Our analysis concludes it is safe.
1690aa961200db0cd7…eca640273a4b8aRecommended next actions
Before opening or extracting
Open or extract it only when its sender or download source has been independently verified.
If you already opened or extracted it
Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
The file shows only low-trust detections from DeepInstinct and MaxSecure with no tier-1 consensus or other malicious indicators. This matches the classic false-positive pattern for low-trust-only flagging on new rare files. Our analysis concludes it is safe.
Only low-trust engines flagged the sample while all 17 tier-1 engines reported clean. No sandbox data, no dropped children, no contacted malicious hosts, and no external intelligence hits exist. The RAR is brand-new with a single submission and carries no heuristics or RAG history. Filename analysis does not indicate security software or research tooling. These factors together produce a high-confidence safe verdict with elevated false-positive likelihood.
What We Detected
Two low-trust engines (DeepInstinct, MaxSecure) returned generic malicious labels on the RAR archive. All tier-1 engines remained silent. No signing, no sandbox behavior, no network activity, and no external corroboration.
Threat Behavior
None observed. The archive contains no executable children or contacted hosts in our cache. Prevalence is limited to a single recent submission.
What To Do Now
The file can be treated as safe for normal use. If you have additional context or the extracted contents, re-submit for deeper analysis.
Where this verdict could be wrong1 caveat
- If the two low-trust engines are correct, the file could be malicious despite zero tier-1 coverage — but onlyLowTrustFlagging pattern and absence of any other signals make this unlikely per established FP heuristics.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- Zero tier-1 malicious detections
- No sandbox or behavioral malice
- No external intelligence hits
Proceed with normal use; the low-trust-only pattern indicates a false positive.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete2 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Not runNo independent reference checks are recorded.
No timestamp recorded
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 2 / 75engines flagged
- 1sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
One or more independent reference checks were incomplete or unavailable.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceExternal-intelligence coverageObserved at - 02
No completed runtime observation is available for this file.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceRuntime coverageObserved at - 03
2 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file, including DeepInstinct and MaxSecure.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
This legacy report does not record whether the independent reference checks completed.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
2 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Barely seen in the wild and first surfaced recently. 2 antivirus detections make that low prevalence materially relevant, but rarity alone is not proof of malware.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- polar_av_6.0.1.rar
- Format
- RAR
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 886.4 KB
- Last analyzed
- Jun 7, 2026, 10:21 AM UTC
1690aa961200db0cd7956162472aaca9e27ccba3c0feaf1cc3eca640273a4b8aSafety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.
- Recovery step 01
Open or extract it only when its sender or download source has been independently verified.
- Recovery step 02
A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.
- Recovery step 03
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is polar_av_6.0.1.rar safe?
What is polar_av_6.0.1.rar?
How many antivirus engines detected polar_av_6.0.1.rar?
What is the SHA-256 hash of polar_av_6.0.1.rar?
Is it safe to open or extract polar_av_6.0.1.rar?
How up to date is this analysis of polar_av_6.0.1.rar?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.