Is TSEBO_Document_Review.pdf safe?
No antivirus engine detected the PDF, and threat-intelligence checks found no match, although its very recent appearance and absent runtime analysis limit certainty.
All 74 antivirus engines were free of malicious or suspicious findings, including 17 high-trust engines. No external intelligence match was found, but the document is newly observed and was not executed in a completed sandbox, so normal caution remains appropriate.
179b432aa53ee011e2…74d211680690ddRecommended next actions
Before opening
Open it only when its sender or download source is one you independently trust.
If you already opened it
Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
All 74 antivirus engines were free of malicious or suspicious findings, including 17 high-trust engines. No external intelligence match was found, but the document is newly observed and was not executed in a completed sandbox, so normal caution remains appropriate.
Static scanning produced no detections across 74 antivirus engines, with all 17 reporting high-trust engines free of findings. Research intelligence checks also returned no known-malware or YARA match. Code signing is not meaningful for a PDF, so its absence carries no weight. The file is rare and recently observed, and no completed runtime analysis is available. Similar-file history is uniformly benign but based only on the broad PDF file type, making it weak supporting context.
What We Detected
None of 74 antivirus engines flagged the PDF as malicious or suspicious. All 17 reporting high-trust engines, including Avast, BitDefender, ESET-NOD32, Kaspersky, and Microsoft, returned no detection. External checks found no MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, or YARAify match.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox observation is available, so the PDF's runtime behavior was not assessed. The file carries PDF and AcroForm tags, but the evidence contains no confirmed exploit, script execution, malicious child process, or malware-family identification. No complete contacted-host reputation result is available.
What To Do Now
Open the document only if it came from an expected source, using an updated PDF reader with endpoint protection enabled. Avoid enabling unexpected actions, following unsolicited links, or entering credentials into forms unless the sender and purpose are verified.
Where this verdict could be wrong4 caveats
- prevalence.classification=rare_new and file.ageDays=0 indicate a newly observed document with only 2 submitters.
- behaviour=null means embedded form actions or other PDF activity were not exercised in a completed sandbox run.
- contactedHosts=null means no complete reputation assessment is available for any potential runtime contacts.
- The 5/5 prior safe similarHashes entries are matchKind=filetype only, so they do not establish content-level similarity.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/74 antivirus engines detected a threat
- 17 high-trust engines reported no detection
- No YARAify rule match
- No MalwareBazaar or CIRCL hit
- No brand mismatch detected
- Newly observed file with ageDays=0
- Low prevalence: 2 submitters and 2 submissions
- No completed sandbox observation
- AcroForm content may support interactive form actions
- No complete contacted-host reputation result
The document can be handled with ordinary caution if its source and purpose are expected. Keep endpoint protection and the PDF reader enabled and fully updated.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 74 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 0 / 74engines flagged
- 2sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
0 of 74 antivirus engines flagged the file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
No completed runtime observation is available for this file.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceRuntime coverageObserved at - 03
The hash has been submitted 2 times from 2 sources.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
0 of 74 engines flagged this file
View all 74 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Barely seen in the wild and first surfaced recently. That limits reputation evidence, but rarity alone is not proof of malware.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- TSEBO_Document_Review.pdf
- Format
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 161.2 KB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 15, 2026, 7:15 AM UTC
179b432aa53ee011e238a7cb5efa32a291e3de729dde77a23874d211680690ddSafety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.
- Recovery step 01
Open it only when its sender or download source is one you independently trust.
- Recovery step 02
A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.
- Recovery step 03
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is TSEBO_Document_Review.pdf safe?
What is TSEBO_Document_Review.pdf?
How many antivirus engines detected TSEBO_Document_Review.pdf?
What is the SHA-256 hash of TSEBO_Document_Review.pdf?
Is it safe to open TSEBO_Document_Review.pdf?
How up to date is this analysis of TSEBO_Document_Review.pdf?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.