File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is Delay Lama. sit safe? Yes, no threats found.
None of the 61 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this long-observed SIT archive, and no malware-family or researcher-curated threat evidence was found.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Open it only if you trust the person or website it came from.
Keep your security software and system updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
0 of 61 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 61
- No result 13
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Not run
- First seen 8y ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
2 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
None of the 61 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, including the major antivirus engines represented in the results. Its long observation history and lack of corroborating malware intelligence support benign handling, although no sandbox execution or complete host-reputation check is available.
The strongest evidence is the absence of detections across 74 engines, with all 17 major antivirus engines that reported a result finding nothing. The file has also been observed for more than eight years across 33 independent submission sources, reducing concern that it is a newly distributed threat. No malware family, specific YARA rule, MalwareBazaar record, malicious child, or adverse feedback supports hostile classification. Code signing is not meaningful for this file type, so its lack of a signature carries no negative weight. Confidence is tempered because the SIT archive was not executed in a sandbox and its contents are not described in the available evidence.
What We Detected
None of the 61 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file as malicious or suspicious. Major antivirus engines including Avast, BitDefender, ESET-NOD32, Kaspersky, and Microsoft reported no detection, and no engine supplied a malware-family label.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox observation is available, so behavior in the test run was not assessed. No complete contacted-host reputation result is available either. The evidence contains no identified malicious file it created, and researcher-curated intelligence produced no malware-specific rule or known-family match.
What To Do Now
The available evidence supports normal handling, but SIT is an archive format and its extracted contents should still be scanned before opening. Keep security software enabled, especially if the file came from an unexpected sender or untrusted download.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- No sandbox execution was completed, so the archive's behavior in the test run and extracted contents were not observed.
- No complete contacted-host reputation result is available.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 61 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file.
- All 17 reporting major antivirus engines returned no detection.
- The file has been observed for more than eight years across 33 submission sources.
- No malware-family record or malware-specific researcher rule matched it.
- The archive was not executed or unpacked in a completed sandbox run.
- No complete reputation check is available for any hosts the contents might contact when opened.
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
Technical details
None of the 61 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 12, 2026, 4:33 AM UTC
- SHA-256
1a066e8bfb40fde8b9b16d85f70f89b0c71701af7a0281636ded4c183be019fd- SHA-1
d9f87742c2203210a577453333d904519731fb50- MD5
16f37056e6ecbff271a5a2ce69368c21
About this file
Delay Lama.sit is an unknown file of 1.4 MB.
- Type and size
- unknown · 1.4 MB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Aug 18, 2018On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 33 distinct sources
First scanned
Includes every engine result (74) and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is Delay Lama.sit safe?
What is Delay Lama.sit?
How many antivirus engines detected Delay Lama.sit?
What is the SHA-256 hash of Delay Lama.sit?
Is it safe to open Delay Lama.sit?
How up to date is this analysis of Delay Lama.sit?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.