File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is Better
None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this JAR, and the completed sandbox run found no concrete malicious outcome despite several broad MITRE mappings.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Run it only if it came from the project's own website.
Keep your security software and system updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Antivirus results
0 of 65 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 65
- No result 10
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Completed
- First seen 2mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
1 point against it and 5 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, including the reporting major antivirus engines.
The antivirus evidence is consistently favorable: none of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the JAR, and no independent detector or major antivirus engine raised an alert. The completed sandbox run returned clean, although it associated the execution with T1055, T1543.002, and T1562.001. Those broad mappings are not corroborated by a named injected process, persistence indicator, malicious network destination, or malicious child verdict. The only listed domain was identified as analysis-environment background traffic, and the complete cache check for that listed contact found no hostile match. Research feeds and malware-specific YARA rules supplied no additional warning, making the behavioral mapping insufficient to outweigh the otherwise consistent evidence.
What We Detected
None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the JAR, with no major or independent detection and no named malware family. Research intelligence also produced no malware-family or malware-specific YARA match.
Threat Behavior
One completed sandbox run returned clean. It mapped T1055, T1543.002, and T1562.001, but recorded no injected target, persistence indicator, or malicious sandbox outcome. The sole listed domain was marked as analysis-VM background traffic rather than sample activity, and the complete cache check for that contact found no malicious or suspicious match. Seven generated files have no saved verdicts, so they remain unclassified rather than evidence of harm.
What To Do Now
Use the JAR only if it came from the expected mod distribution page and its hash matches the publisher's value. Keep Java and security software enabled, and avoid granting the mod unnecessary system privileges.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- The sandbox mapped process injection, service creation, and impairment of defenses, but it recorded no injected target, persistence indicator, or malicious sandbox conclusion.
- Seven files were produced without saved verdicts, so their nature remains unconfirmed even though none has a saved malicious result.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file.
- The completed sandbox run returned clean and recorded no injected target or persistence indicator.
- The only listed network contact was identified as analysis-environment background traffic, with no hostile cache match.
- No malware-family intelligence or malware-specific YARA rule matched the sample.
- No generated file has a saved malicious verdict.
- Seven generated files remain unclassified because no saved verdict is available for them.
6 sources checked · all complete. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 15sandbox rule tags
- 3spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 13filesystem & mutex artifacts
Includes the sandbox verdicts, 15 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 3 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · all complete. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 13, 2026, 5:59 PM UTC
- SHA-256
1a916890d9dce386d8646236f80f68797e03a08ec888024979e42c69c1276660- SHA-1
04b77df31c742b515e29915dfa2104b4f09a5d21- MD5
43671d787988c628aa395e38fc2316c4
About this file
BetterHitreg-1.0.7+1.21.11.jar is a JAR file of 102.1 kB.
- Type and size
- JAR · 102.1 kB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Aug 17, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 25 distinct sources
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), 1 matched signature rule and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is BetterHitreg-1.0.7+1.21.11.jar safe?
What is BetterHitreg-1.0.7+1.21.11.jar?
How many antivirus engines detected BetterHitreg-1.0.7+1.21.11.jar?
What is the SHA-256 hash of BetterHitreg-1.0.7+1.21.11.jar?
Is it safe to open or run BetterHitreg-1.0.7+1.21.11.jar?
How up to date is this analysis of BetterHitreg-1.0.7+1.21.11.jar?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.