File scan report
Verdict Suspicious
Is 198- Macros- Cracked- v1. 4. 0. jar safe? Treat it as suspicious.
A major engine identifies this uninspected Java archive as a potentially unsafe game tool, but the remaining evidence neither confirms malware nor establishes a trusted origin.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Why Suspicious? One antivirus engine (ESET) flags it; nothing else confirms it.
Limited evidence
If it came from a link, an attachment or a stranger, delete it.
What to do now4 steps
Some signs point to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful. Treat it with caution.
What to do
Don't open or run it unless you're sure where it came from.
Check where you got it: an unexpected attachment, a link someone sent you or a re-upload is a red flag.
If you can't confirm where it came from, delete it. If you need the program, download it again from the publisher's own website.
If you already opened or ran it
Stop using it, run a full scan with your antivirus and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts.
Not sure what to do?
Ask the MalwareTips community before you run it. If you already ran it, follow the cleanup guide.
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
1 of 65 flagged
- Flagged 1
- No detection 64
- No result 10
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Completed
- First seen 2mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
4 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
One of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it, ESET-NOD32, identifies this Java archive as a potentially unsafe game tool; the other reported results do not corroborate that label. Because its crack-style name raises concern and its compressed classes were not examined by our static analysis, there is not enough evidence to establish either harmful code or a trustworthy release.
The antivirus results are mixed: ESET-NOD32 flags the archive as a potentially unsafe game tool, while no other engine among the 75 flags it. That label describes potentially unwanted gaming functionality rather than a named malware family. The sandbox runs provide no malicious verdict, named injection target, persistence indicator, or corroborated high-risk technique; the and mappings lack the artifacts needed to support those claims. However, this is a Java archive with a crack-style name, and our static analysis did not inspect its compressed classes. With no verified author identity, exact release match, or known-good reference entry, the evidence cannot resolve whether ESET-NOD32 found an unwanted game tool or produced a false positive.
What We Detected
ESET-NOD32 is the only engine among 75 to flag the Java archive, describing it as a potentially unsafe game tool. No engine consensus identifies a named malware family, and 17 other major engines reported no detection.
Threat Behavior
The sandbox runs produced no malicious verdict and recorded no named process-injection target or persistence. Two technique mappings appeared without the artifacts they describe, so they do not demonstrate process injection or interference with security controls. The only recorded network address was identified as analysis-environment background traffic rather than activity attributable to the sample. A complete host-reputation cross-check is not available.
What To Do Now
Do not run this archive on a primary system until its origin and exact contents can be verified. Obtain it from a trusted release channel, keep security software enabled, and inspect or test it in an isolated environment if analysis is necessary.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- Only one of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, while 17 other major engines reported no detection.
- The sandbox runs recorded no named injection target, no malicious verdict, and no high-risk technique with supporting evidence.
- The file has been submitted by 69 distinct sources, although that distribution alone does not verify its origin or contents.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- Only one of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the archive.
- The sandbox runs recorded no malicious verdict, named injection target, or persistence.
- No inspected file it created was identified as harmful.
- The file was submitted by 69 distinct sources rather than appearing from only a few submitters.
- A major antivirus engine labels the archive a potentially unsafe game tool.
- The crack-style name is associated with modified or unofficial software distribution.
- The compressed Java classes were not examined by our static analysis.
- No verified publisher identity, exact release match, or known-good reference establishes its origin.
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 16sandbox rule tags
- 3spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 14filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Ran commands or a script on the test computer.
Moderate concern: Hid files or windows on the test computer.
Note: Read basic details of the test computer, such as its Windows version.
Note: Loaded extra code modules while running.
Note: Checked which security software was installed on the test computer.
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as code injection, but no injected program was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as downloading a file, but no download was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as creating a service; no new service was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as weakening security settings; no setting change was recorded.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 5: FileSeen in the test run
198-Macros-Cracked-v1.4.0.jar
1c41d33235e945a0fd920385d81466aef8da154eaeb6433cb63c725558eeaadb
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
javaw.exe
"C:\Program Files\Java\jre-1.8\bin\javaw.exe" -jar "C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\sample.jar"
Test run - Evidence 3 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
cmd.exe
C:\Windows\SysWOW64\cmd.exe C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe /c ""C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.8.0_441\bin\java.exe" -javaagent:"C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\jartracer.jar" -jar "C:\Users\user\Desktop\sample.jar"" >> C:\cmdlinestart.log 2>&1
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Files
Created or changed
- Evidence 4 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
5736
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_<USER>\5736
Test run - Evidence 5 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
3903daac9bc4a3b7.timestamp
C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage\3903daac9bc4a3b7.timestamp
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
5 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
Includes 16 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 3 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
1 of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flags it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 1
- ESET-NOD32 (major engine)Java/GameTool.AG potentially unsafe application
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Sep 4, 2026, 3:22 PM UTC
- SHA-256
1c41d33235e945a0fd920385d81466aef8da154eaeb6433cb63c725558eeaadb- SHA-1
6b2ff603257352262838bec8dfc94fa6a49e4963- MD5
38fed1657ec7f675651d6013e534b561
About this file
198-Macros-Cracked-v1.4.0.jar is a JAR file of 18.3 kB.
- Type and size
- JAR · 18.3 kB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Aug 11, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 69 distinct sources
First scanned Updated
Includes every engine result (75), 1 matched signature rule and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is 198-Macros-Cracked-v1.4.0.jar safe, or is it malware?
What is 198-Macros-Cracked-v1.4.0.jar?
How many antivirus engines detected 198-Macros-Cracked-v1.4.0.jar?
What should I do if I already opened or ran 198-Macros-Cracked-v1.4.0.jar?
What is the SHA-256 hash of 198-Macros-Cracked-v1.4.0.jar?
How up to date is this analysis of 198-Macros-Cracked-v1.4.0.jar?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.