Threat LensFile scan report

Is marlowwwclient-v4.jar safe?

Verdict
Safe

No antivirus engine detected the JAR, while one sandbox produced uncorroborated offensive-technique mappings that warrant ordinary caution about its source.

The JAR received no detections from 75 antivirus engines, including no tier-1 flags, and no external intelligence source identified it. One sandbox mapped activity to process injection, service modification, and defense impairment, but issued no malicious runtime verdict; use the file only if its origin is trusted.

Open or run with normal care

Use the JAR only when it came from a trusted, expected source; otherwise test it in isolation. Keep antivirus and endpoint protection enabled.

Read the full analysis
Saved file evidenceAntivirus consensus
0of 75 flagged
Flagged 0No detection 75
Digital specimenmarlowwwclient-v4.jar1d76a6d0e084587ca5…0826ce8351cd0e
Size2.3 MB
Code signingNot applicable
SandboxRuntime complete
First seen2mo ago
Evidence3 priority signals
0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file.

Recommended next actions

01

Before opening or running

Open or run it only when its publisher and download source have been independently verified.

02

If you already opened or ran it

Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.

Chapter 02

Intelligence

The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.

MT AI Engine · Verdict analysis

The reasoning behind this verdict

This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.

77%Confidence
High
Analyst conclusion

The JAR received no detections from 75 antivirus engines, including no tier-1 flags, and no external intelligence source identified it. One sandbox mapped activity to process injection, service modification, and defense impairment, but issued no malicious runtime verdict; use the file only if its origin is trusted.

Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
  • The sandbox mapped activity to T1055, T1543.002, and T1562.001, including possible process injection and defense impairment; these are meaningful risk signals despite lacking engine corroboration.
  • All 9 inspected dropped children have unknown verdicts, so droppedChildren.hasMaliciousChild=false does not establish that those files are benign.
  • contactedHosts=null means no saved host-reputation cross-check is available, although the recorded sandbox contacts list is empty.

These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.

Recommended action

Use the JAR only when it came from a trusted, expected source; otherwise test it in isolation. Keep antivirus and endpoint protection enabled.

Scan transparency

Coverage & freshness

4 of 5 complete

Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.

  • Antivirus

    Complete

    0 of 75 engines flagged the file.

  • Sandbox

    Complete

    1 isolated runtime environment contributed observations.

  • Network

    Not run

    No contacted-host reputation check is recorded.

    No timestamp recorded
  • YARA

    Complete

    1 signature or behavior rule matched.

  • External intel

    Complete

    3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.

Chapter 03

Behavior

Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.

Runtime flight recorder

Capture complete
  • 1isolated sandbox run
  • 15MITRE ATT&CK techniques
  • 15spawned processes
  • 0network contacts
  • 15filesystem & mutex artifacts
Recorded behavior

Attack story

Runtime observations grouped by analysis stage. Arrows organize the stages; they do not claim chronology or causality.

ObservedDerived

5 recorded facts from one runtime window. Every fact remains independently traceable in Analyst mode.

Chapter 04

Detection & Forensics

Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.

Chapter 05

Safety & FAQ

Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.

What to do now

This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.

  1. Recovery step 01

    Open or run it only when its publisher and download source have been independently verified.

  2. Recovery step 02

    A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.

  3. Recovery step 03

    Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.

Safety FAQ

Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.

6 evidence-based answers
Is marlowwwclient-v4.jar safe?
Evidence-based answer
marlowwwclient-v4.jar appears safe. 0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged it. Open or run it only when its publisher and download source have been independently verified.
What is marlowwwclient-v4.jar?
Evidence-based answer
marlowwwclient-v4.jar is a Java application or archive, about 2.3 MB. Our analysis did not identify a verdict-driving threat signal. A file's name can be reused by different files, so we identify it by its cryptographic hash (below).
How many antivirus engines detected marlowwwclient-v4.jar?
Evidence-based answer
None — 0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged marlowwwclient-v4.jar. That's reassuring, though it is not proof that a file is safe, so we also weigh its behaviour, identity, and reputation.
What is the SHA-256 hash of marlowwwclient-v4.jar?
Evidence-based answer
The SHA-256 hash of marlowwwclient-v4.jar is 1d76a6d0e084587ca58ba50db833f033cc8efda9ad57af04b20826ce8351cd0e, and its MD5 is cbe33b099b5ca42b3873bbcdddb28a9d. This hash is the file's unique fingerprint — two files with the same SHA-256 are identical. Use it to confirm you're looking at exactly this file (not just one with the same name) when comparing against antivirus databases or a download's published checksum.
Is it safe to open or run marlowwwclient-v4.jar?
Evidence-based answer
Based on the recorded evidence, marlowwwclient-v4.jar has a low observed risk. The important caveat is source: make sure you downloaded it from the official website or a trusted store, because attackers sometimes distribute malware-laced copies under a legitimate file's name. If your own antivirus flags it, verify the source and the exact hash before overriding the warning.
How up to date is this analysis of marlowwwclient-v4.jar?
Evidence-based answer
This report reflects the scan run on September 17, 2026. Because a file's hash never changes, the identity of marlowwwclient-v4.jar is fixed — but antivirus coverage improves over time, so a file that looks clean today can pick up detections later (and vice-versa). If you need the latest picture, MalwareTips staff can re-run the analysis from scratch.
Chapter 06

Community

Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.

The raw file is processed temporarily and is not retained after processing. Its hash and report are public and permanent, so the next person who checks the same file gets an instant answer. Unknown files may be submitted to VirusTotal for analysis. If you ran this file on your computer and are worried, scan your system with an up-to-date antivirus and change critical passwords from a different device.