File scan report
Verdict Suspicious
Is Patch. exe safe? Treat it as suspicious.
This unsigned, rarely submitted patcher self-extracts and drops an executable, and three machine-learning engines flag it, though no major antivirus engine or named family backs…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Why Suspicious? 5 antivirus engines flag it, but no major engine agrees; nothing else confirms it.
Limited evidence · One sign points to a problem; nothing else confirms it.
Avoid running this patcher unless it comes from a source you trust. Keep your security software enabled, and scan the system if it has already been executed.
What to do now4 steps
Some signs point to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful. Treat it with caution.
What to do
Don't run it unless you're sure where it came from.
Check where you got it: an unexpected attachment, a link someone sent you or a re-upload is a red flag.
If you can't confirm where it came from, delete it. If you need the program, download it again from the publisher's own website.
If you already ran it
Stop using it, run a full scan with your antivirus and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts.
Not sure what to do?
Ask the MalwareTips community before you run it. If you already ran it, follow the cleanup guide.
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
5 of 69 flagged
- Flagged 5
- No detection 64
- No result 5
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 3mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
4 points against it and 3 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
Five of the 69 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this unsigned file, including CrowdStrike, Elastic and SentinelOne machine-learning detections, while all major antivirus engines stayed silent. In our sandbox it behaved like a self-extracting archive that drops a program into an engineering-software folder, typical of software cracks. Treat it with caution.
The file is an unsigned 64-bit executable named as a patch, submitted by a single source and first seen on Jul 11, 2026. Three of these are machine-learning verdicts from CrowdStrike, Elastic and SentinelOne, and two are less reliable reputation labels; no major antivirus engines detects it and no family is named. The sandbox runs show a RAR self-extractor unpacking an executable into a folder named after engineering software, which is how cracks and patchers are commonly delivered. There is no observed injection target, persistence or malicious network contact, and the one similar file in our history only shares the self-extractor's import table. The combination of an unsigned crack-style dropper and several independent detections warrants caution without proving malware.
What We Detected
Five of the 69 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this file: CrowdStrike, Elastic and SentinelOne with machine-learning verdicts, plus APEX and McAfeeD. None of the 18 major antivirus engines that reported on it detected anything, and no malware family is named. The file is unsigned and was submitted by one source, first seen on Jul 11, 2026.
Threat Behavior
In the sandbox runs the file acted as a WinRAR self-extracting archive. It extracted an executable into a folder named after engineering software, consistent with a crack or patch. No process injection target, persistence or malicious network activity was recorded. No complete host-reputation result is available.
What To Do Now
Do not run this patcher unless you trust its source. Cracks and patches from unofficial sources are a common way to deliver malware. Keep your antivirus enabled. If you already ran it, scan the system and remove the extracted folder.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- All 18 major antivirus engines that reported on the file found nothing, and none of the detections names a malware family, so they may be machine-learning false positives on a software crack.
- The only similar-file match comes from a shared self-extractor import table, not a matching signer.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the major antivirus engines detected the file
- No malware family is named by any engine
- No process injection target or persistence was recorded in the sandbox runs
- Three independent machine-learning engines flag the file as malicious
- Unsigned executable presented as a patch, submitted by a single source
- Self-extracts and drops another executable into a folder on the system drive
- Crack-style tools are a frequent malware delivery route
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 18sandbox rule tags
- 3spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 10filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Contains packed or scrambled code that is harder to inspect (common in installers too).
Moderate concern: Ran commands or a script on the test computer.
Moderate concern: Unpacked hidden content while it ran.
Moderate concern: Checked whether it was running on a test computer.
Moderate concern: Hid files or windows on the test computer.
Note: Read the user name of the test computer.
Note: Read basic details of the test computer, such as its Windows version.
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as code injection, but no injected program was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as contacting a server, but no contacted host was recorded.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 5: FileSeen in the test run
Patch.exe
2035c328e6ea20abc718a83fc339e931e7200f9b31c0e026deedb66d4445f72b
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
Patch.exe
"C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\Patch.exe"
Test run - Evidence 3 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
Patch.exe
"C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\Patch.exe" -el6020 -s2 "-dC:\" "-sp"
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Files
Created or changed
- Evidence 4 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
__tmp_rar_sfx_access_check_48625
\Device\HarddiskVolume2\\__tmp_rar_sfx_access_check_48625
Test run - Evidence 5 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
__tmp_rar_sfx_access_check_48625
C:\__tmp_rar_sfx_access_check_48625
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
5 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
Includes 18 mapped techniques and every process, file, registry and network entry.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
5 of the 69 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 5
- APEXMalicious
- CrowdStrikewin/malicious_confidence_90% (D)
- Elasticmalicious (moderate confidence)
- McAfeeDti!2035C328E6EA
- SentinelOneStatic AI - Suspicious PE
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Jul 11, 2026, 1:37 PM UTC
- SHA-256
2035c328e6ea20abc718a83fc339e931e7200f9b31c0e026deedb66d4445f72b- SHA-1
db0cfc9e0f8f5b1843ecfa632457e5f07f91fcf6- MD5
8f95cca0074835439c80173af36c3c18
About this file
Patch.exe is a Win32 EXE file of 9.2 MB.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 9.2 MB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Jul 11, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 1 sourceRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 8.00 of 8
First scanned Updated
Includes every engine result (74), 1 matched signature rule, PE section entropy and packers and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is Patch.exe safe, or is it malware?
What is Patch.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected Patch.exe?
What should I do if I already ran Patch.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of Patch.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of Patch.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.