File scan report
Verdict Suspicious
Is corzclient- 1. 21. 11. jar safe? Treat it as suspicious.
None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, and no malware family, malicious host, or confirmed malicious child was identified.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Why Suspicious? One sandbox test run rated it malicious while another found nothing; nothing else confirms it.
Limited evidence · One sign points to a problem; nothing else confirms it.
If it came from a link, an attachment or a stranger, delete it.
What to do now4 steps
Some signs point to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful. Treat it with caution.
What to do
Don't open or run it unless you're sure where it came from.
Check where you got it: an unexpected attachment, a link someone sent you or a re-upload is a red flag.
If you can't confirm where it came from, delete it. If you need the program, download it again from the publisher's own website.
If you already opened or ran it
Stop using it, run a full scan with your antivirus and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts.
Not sure what to do?
Ask the MalwareTips community before you run it. If you already ran it, follow the cleanup guide.
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
0 of 65 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 65
- No result 9
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Completed
- First seen 18d ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 5 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
The strongest favorable evidence is that none of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the JAR, including all 17 reporting major antivirus engines. Evidence from the test run is inconclusive because one sandbox reported malware and another reported clean. and were mapped, but no injected process, persistence indicator, or sample-originated network contact was recorded. The only contacted domain was explicitly identified as analysis-environment background traffic. External intelligence supplied no malware-specific rules or family identification, while all eight dropped files remain unresolved rather than confirmed harmful.
What We Detected
None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the JAR, and the scan produced no named malware family. External intelligence also returned no malware-specific YARA rules or MalwareBazaar match.
Threat Behavior
Two sandbox runs disagreed: one reported malware and the other reported clean. The sole contacted domain was identified as background traffic generated by the analysis environment, not by the sample. Eight files were dropped, but no saved verdict is available for any of them.
What To Do Now
Verify the download source and checksum before running the JAR. If its origin cannot be established, keep it isolated and obtain a fresh copy from the developer's official distribution channel while leaving security software enabled.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- One of two sandbox runs issued a malware verdict, so the runtime result cannot be dismissed despite the clean antivirus findings.
- The runtime mapping includes process injection and service-related execution techniques, although no injected target or persistence artifact was identified.
- All eight dropped files lack saved verdicts, leaving their nature unresolved.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file.
- All 17 reporting major antivirus engines returned no detection.
- No malware-specific external intelligence or named family was found.
- No injected target process or persistence artifact was recorded.
- The only observed network contact was analysis-environment background traffic.
- One of two sandbox runs reported malware.
- The test run mapped possible process injection and service-related execution.
- The file was first seen on Oct 8, 2026 in the available submission history.
6 sources checked · all complete. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; 1 test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 16sandbox rule tags
- 3spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 15filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Contains packed or scrambled code that is harder to inspect (common in installers too).
Moderate concern: Ran commands or a script on the test computer.
Moderate concern: Hid files or windows on the test computer.
Note: Read basic details of the test computer, such as its Windows version.
Note: Loaded extra code modules while running.
Note: Checked which security software was installed on the test computer.
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as code injection, but no injected program was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as downloading a file, but no download was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as creating a service; no new service was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as changing how Windows loads code; nothing confirms it.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 5: FileSeen in the test run
corzclient-1.21.11.jar
210ac68bc9daa772a2ec49b8d2454a30f0bf52bd1460773d6103fc7bdfffda5f
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
javaw.exe
"C:\Program Files\Java\jre-1.8\bin\javaw.exe" -jar "C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\runtime.jar"
Test run - Evidence 3 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
cmd.exe
C:\Windows\SysWOW64\cmd.exe C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe /c ""C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.8.0_441\bin\java.exe" -jar "C:\Users\user\Desktop\runtime.jar""
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Files
Created or changed
- Evidence 4 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
3336
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_<USER>\3336
Test run - Evidence 5 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
3903daac9bc4a3b7.timestamp
C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage\3903daac9bc4a3b7.timestamp
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
5 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
What this file did when executed
The combined sandbox summary is split: at least one run returned "malicious" and another returned "clean".
Sandbox verdicts
2- VT: MALWARE, TROJANmalicious
- VT: CLEANclean
Techniques observed in the sandbox
16MITRE ATT&CK techniques the sandbox mapped. Highlighted ones are rare in normal software; the others are common in legitimate programs too.
- T1027· Obfuscated code
- T1055· Process injection
- T1059· Runs commands
- T1064
- T1074
- T1082· System recon
- T1105· Network file transfer
- T1106
- T1129· Loads modules
- T1202
- T1518.001· Checks your AV
- T1543.002· Service install
- T1564· Hides artifacts
- T1564.001· Hides artifacts
- T1564.003· Hides artifacts
- T1574· Execution hijack
Observed activity
Processes started
3Programs the file ran, with their command lines.
javaw.exe"C:\Program Files\Java\jre-1.8\bin\javaw.exe" -jar "C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\runtime.jar"cmd.exeC:\Windows\SysWOW64\cmd.exe C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe /c ""C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.8.0_441\bin\java.exe" -jar "C:\Users\user\Desktop\runtime.jar""java.exe"C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.8.0_441\bin\java.exe" -jar "C:\Users\user\Desktop\runtime.jar"
Files
15Files the file created, changed or deleted.
- Written
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_<USER>\3336 - Written
C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage\3903daac9bc4a3b7.timestamp - Written
C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage\17dfc292991c8786.timestamp - Written
C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_user - Written
C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_user\6560 - Written
\Device\ConDrv
Show all 15 entries for files
- Written
\Device\ConDrv\\Connect - Written
/proc/3558/coredump_filter - Written
/tmp/hsperfdata_root/3558 - Written
/var/log/auth.log.1.gz - Written
/var/log/dpkg.log.1.gz - Written
/var/log/kern.log.1.gz - Written
/var/log/syslog.1.gz - Deleted
C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_user\5704 - Deleted
/tmp/hsperfdata_root/3558
Sandbox background — not the file
13The analysis machine's own processes and connections, recorded in every run.
- VM process
icacls.exeC:\Windows\system32\icacls.exe C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage /grant "everyone":(OI)(CI)M - VM process
conhost.exeC:\Windows\System32\conhost.exe C:\Windows\system32\conhost.exe 0xffffffff -ForceV1 - VM process
gzip/bin/gzip - VM process
sh/bin/sh sh -c "\n\t\tinvoke-rc.d --quiet cups restart > /dev/null\n" logrotate_script "/var/log/cups/*log " - VM process
invoke-rc.d/usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d invoke-rc.d --quiet cups restart - VM process
runlevel/sbin/runlevel
Show all 13 entries for sandbox background — not the file
- VM process
systemctl/usr/bin/systemctl systemctl --quiet is-enabled cups.service - VM process
ls/usr/bin/ls ls /etc/rc[S2345].d/S[0-9][0-9]cups - VM process
systemctl/usr/bin/systemctl systemctl --quiet is-active cups.service - VM process
sh/bin/sh sh -c /usr/lib/rsyslog/rsyslog-rotate logrotate_script /var/log/syslog - VM process
rsyslog-rotate/usr/lib/rsyslog/rsyslog-rotate - VM process
systemctl/usr/bin/systemctl systemctl kill -s HUP rsyslog.service - VM host
atm.teams.mira.tm.svc.cloud.microsoft
Files this sample writes at runtime
This file drops 3 children at runtime. None are currently flagged malicious in our cache. 3 have no saved verdict and were not checked; that is missing coverage, not a finding.
- f8baecde155a50021e44…c92adbNot checkedno saved verdict
- 86b3a8df90ce6c5eada9…b63937Not checkedno saved verdict
- ac6540baa0c810e6fa7e…9cd797Not checkedno saved verdict
Chapter 04
Technical details
None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · all complete. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 15, 2026, 7:41 PM UTC
- SHA-256
210ac68bc9daa772a2ec49b8d2454a30f0bf52bd1460773d6103fc7bdfffda5f- SHA-1
09bcd45a802e00d10096e7a0d9f153f42545a306- MD5
5e820a56c2d38dfd405bfee42bf79b3b
About this file
corzclient-1.21.11.jar is a JAR file of 40.2 MB.
- Type and size
- JAR · 40.2 MB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Oct 8, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 18 distinct sources
First scanned
Antivirus consensus
0 of 65 engines flagged this file
9 of the 74 engines returned no result for this file (file type not supported, or the scan did not finish), so they did not check it.
- Tier-118 engines0flagged
- Tier-234 engines0flagged
- Low-trust13 engines0flagged
View all 74 engine results
- AcronisClean
- AhnLab-V3Clean
- AlibabaClean
- alibabacloudClean
- ALYacClean
- Antiy-AVLClean
- APEXNo result
- ArcabitClean
- AvastClean
- Avast-MobileClean
- AVGClean
- AviraClean
- BitDefenderClean
- BitDefenderFalxNo result
- BkavClean
- CAT-QuickHealClean
- ClamAVClean
- CMCClean
- CrowdStrikeClean
- CTXClean
- CylanceNo result
- CynetClean
- DeepInstinctNo result
- DrWebClean
- ElasticNo result
- EmsisoftClean
- ESET-NOD32Clean
- F-SecureClean
- FortinetClean
- GDataClean
- GoogleClean
- GridinsoftClean
- huorongClean
- IkarusClean
- JiangminClean
- K7AntiVirusClean
- K7GWClean
- KasperskyClean
- KingsoftClean
- LionicClean
- MalwarebytesClean
- MaxSecureClean
- McAfeeDClean
- MicrosoftClean
- MicroWorld-eScanClean
- NANO-AntivirusClean
- PaloaltoNo result
- PandaClean
- RisingClean
- SangforClean
- SentinelOneClean
- SkyhighClean
- SophosClean
- SUPERAntiSpywareClean
- SymantecClean
- SymantecMobileInsightNo result
- TACHYONClean
- tehtrisNo result
- TencentClean
- TrapmineNo result
- TrellixENSClean
- TrendMicroClean
- TrendMicro-HouseCallClean
- VaristClean
- VBA32Clean
- VIPREClean
- VirITClean
- ViRobotClean
- WebrootClean
- XcitiumClean
- YandexClean
- ZillyaClean
- ZoneAlarmClean
- ZonerClean
Signatures and behavior heuristics
Low-severity pattern matches — worth noting but not on their own cause for alarm.
VirusTotal's sandbox summary maps this run to MITRE T1055 (Process Injection), but no injected process of the sample's own was recorded (the analysis VM's own WMI adapter, crash handlers and Chrome updater are not counted). VirusTotal maps T1055 on about half of all files no engine flags, so the mapping alone is not evidence of injection.
EvidenceT1055 (sandbox MITRE mapping)
How widely this file has been seen
Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.
Chapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is corzclient-1.21.11.jar safe, or is it malware?
What is corzclient-1.21.11.jar?
How many antivirus engines detected corzclient-1.21.11.jar?
I already downloaded and opened or ran corzclient-1.21.11.jar — what should I do?
What is the SHA-256 hash of corzclient-1.21.11.jar?
How up to date is this analysis of corzclient-1.21.11.jar?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.