File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is meteor- meteorplusplus- 1. 0. 0. jar safe? Yes, no threats found.
This Java mod archive drew no detections from any of the 75 engines in our network, and the sandbox runs showed no high-risk behaviour or malicious network activity.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
The evidence supports using this mod. Obtain it from the project's official source and keep your security software enabled.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Run it only if it came from the project's own website.
Keep your security software and system updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
0 of 65 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 65
- No result 10
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Completed
- First seen 5mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
2 points against it and 3 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this Java archive, including every major antivirus engine. In the sandbox runs it simply started Java and wrote ordinary runtime files. It has no listings in public malware databases and matched no malware-specific rules.
None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, and all 18 major antivirus engines that analysed it reported it undetected. The sandbox runs launched the archive under Java and recorded only routine runtime files, with no named process injection and no persistence. The injection and defence-evasion technique labels appeared without any supporting artefact, which is common for clean software. The only network contact was the analysis machine's own background traffic. The file is not listed in MalwareBazaar, matched no malware-specific YARA rules, and dropped no file known to be malicious.
What We Detected
This Java archive appears to be a Minecraft client addon. None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged it, and every major antivirus engine that analysed it reported it undetected. It has no hits in public malware databases or community rule sets.
Threat Behavior
In the sandbox runs the archive was launched with Java and wrote standard Java runtime files. No process injection target, persistence mechanism or registry change was recorded. The only network contact belonged to the analysis machine's own background activity. A full reputation check of contacted hosts was not available.
What To Do Now
The evidence supports using this file. Mods are a common lure for stealers, so download addons only from the project's official release page and keep your antivirus enabled.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- Minecraft mod files are a known lure for credential stealers, and this one has only a small number of submitters, so a newly built malicious variant cannot be fully ruled out.
- No reputation check of contacted hosts was completed for this file.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- No detections from any of the 75 engines, including all major antivirus engines.
- No high-risk techniques or injection targets were observed in the sandbox runs.
- No listings in public malware databases and no matches to malware-specific rules.
- Only a small number of people have submitted this file so far.
- Game mods are a category that attackers sometimes abuse to deliver credential stealers.
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 14sandbox rule tags
- 4spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 11filesystem & mutex artifacts
Includes 14 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 2 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Sep 8, 2026, 3:34 PM UTC
- SHA-256
224f1fcfd36bf737c38838254778c50bd30769a2d16bd0f390f95d107ad84ba3- SHA-1
2abb1e2249b7f683504716da99561e92a5fb9b17- MD5
410206729ffefa57128ea9b96f0a0712
About this file
meteor-meteorplusplus-1.0.0.jar is a JAR file of 144.0 kB.
- Type and size
- JAR · 144.0 kB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- May 27, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 2 distinct sourcesRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
First scanned Updated
Verdict history
- Suspicious
- Safeafter a re-check of the saved evidence
Ratings change when antivirus engines, our checks or MalwareTips staff learn more about a file.
Includes every engine result (75), 1 matched signature rule and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is meteor-meteorplusplus-1.0.0.jar safe?
What is meteor-meteorplusplus-1.0.0.jar?
How many antivirus engines detected meteor-meteorplusplus-1.0.0.jar?
What is the SHA-256 hash of meteor-meteorplusplus-1.0.0.jar?
Is it safe to open or run meteor-meteorplusplus-1.0.0.jar?
How up to date is this analysis of meteor-meteorplusplus-1.0.0.jar?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.