Is ScreenConnect.Client.exe safe?
Ten of 74 engines flagged this newly observed, Ricoh-signed remote-access client, including three tier-1 detections, but no confirmed hacktool or runtime evidence exists.
The file presents mixed evidence: 10 of 74 engines flagged it, and ESET-NOD32 and Kaspersky identified ConnectWise remote-administration functionality. Although its Ricoh USA signature verifies, the publisher has no established history here, the file is newly observed, and no runtime or complete host-reputation evidence is available.
2bb34c81b5aadae29f…de9f80ae84f5beRecommended next actions
Before running
Do not run it until the source and publisher can be verified independently.
If you already ran it
Stop using it, scan the device, and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts. Get a fresh copy from the developer's official site or an official app store.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
The file presents mixed evidence: 10 of 74 engines flagged it, and ESET-NOD32 and Kaspersky identified ConnectWise remote-administration functionality. Although its Ricoh USA signature verifies, the publisher has no established history here, the file is newly observed, and no runtime or complete host-reputation evidence is available.
Three tier-1 engines are among the 10 of 74 detections, so the findings cannot be dismissed as low-trust noise. Two tier-1 products identify remote-administration functionality associated with ConnectWise Control, but the consensus is not strong and the hacktool confirmation condition is not met. The executable has a valid Ricoh USA signature, yet that publisher is not on the curated trusted list and has no historical sample record in this evidence. Its first-day prevalence and the mismatch between the filename's product identity and the unfamiliar signer warrant caution, although no formal brand mismatch was detected. With no completed sandbox run and no saved contacted-host cross-check, the evidence cannot establish whether this particular client performed harmful actions.
What We Detected
10 of 74 antivirus engines flagged the executable, including three tier-1 engines. ESET-NOD32 and Kaspersky identify ConnectWise remote-administration functionality, while several other detections range from riskware to generic trojan or machine-learning labels. The two-engine remote-administration agreement does not meet the strong tier-1 consensus threshold, and engines.hacktoolConfirmed=false.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox observation is available because behaviour is null. The contacted-host reputation check was also not completed or saved, so network safety cannot be assessed. Static PE analysis reports peAnalysis.highEntropyCode=false and peAnalysis.likelyPacked=false, providing no clear packing indication.
What To Do Now
Do not run the file unless it came through a verified Ricoh or ConnectWise support workflow and its hash can be confirmed by that source. Keep endpoint protection enabled, quarantine the file if its origin is uncertain, and request an independently verified installer from the organization's official support channel.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- 14 of 17 tier-1 engines did not flag the sample, including BitDefender, Avast, Avira, Fortinet, and F-Secure.
- signing.verified=true, brandMismatch is null, and peAnalysis.likelyPacked=false; these reduce concern about crude impersonation or packing.
- ESET-NOD32 calls the software 'potentially unsafe' and Kaspersky uses 'not-a-virus', which may indicate legitimate dual-use remote-administration software rather than an intrinsically malicious payload.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- The Ricoh USA digital signature verifies.
- 14 of 17 tier-1 engines did not flag the file.
- engines.hacktoolConfirmed=false and tier1FamilyConsensus.strong=false.
- peAnalysis.highEntropyCode=false and peAnalysis.likelyPacked=false.
- brandMismatch is null.
- 10 of 74 engines reported a detection.
- Three independent tier-1 engines flagged the executable.
- ESET-NOD32 and Kaspersky identify remote-administration functionality.
- The sample was observed from only one source on its first submission day.
- The Ricoh USA signer has no established sample history in this evidence.
- No completed runtime or complete contacted-host reputation assessment is available.
Keep protection enabled and avoid execution until the SHA-256 is confirmed through an official Ricoh or ConnectWise support channel. Quarantine or remove it if the remote-access installation was unsolicited.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete10 of 74 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 10 / 74engines flagged
- 1sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
10 of 74 antivirus engines flagged the file, including DeepInstinct and Elastic.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
The file has a valid code signature from Ricoh USA.
ProvenanceObservedSourceCode-signing metadataObserved at - 03
The hash has been submitted 1 time from 1 source.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
Category: pua
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
10 of 74 engines flagged this file
View all 74 engine results
Section entropy & packers
No high-entropy executable section or known packer signature was detected. Data and resource sections can still have high entropy without indicating packed code.
How widely this file has been seen
Barely seen in the wild and first surfaced recently. 10 antivirus detections make that low prevalence materially relevant, but rarity alone is not proof of malware.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- ScreenConnect.Client.exe
- Format
- Win32 EXE
- Code signing
- Signature valid: Ricoh USA
- Size
- 3.7 MB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 14, 2026, 2:47 PM UTC
2bb34c81b5aadae29fcbff2940d69ae3cf8cc3014c295c08e6de9f80ae84f5beSafety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
We couldn't fully clear this file. Treat it with caution.
- Recovery step 01
Don't run it unless you're certain it came from a source you trust.
- Recovery step 02
Check where you got it — an unexpected attachment or a random download link is a red flag.
- Recovery step 03
If its origin cannot be confirmed, delete this file and use a fresh copy from a trusted source. Get a fresh copy from the developer's official site or an official app store.
- Recovery step 04
If you're still unsure, scan it again in a day or two — detections often catch up on newer files.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is ScreenConnect.Client.exe safe, or is it malware?
What is ScreenConnect.Client.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected ScreenConnect.Client.exe?
I already downloaded and ran ScreenConnect.Client.exe — what should I do?
How do I remove ScreenConnect.Client.exe?
What kind of malware is ScreenConnect.Client.exe?
Is ScreenConnect.Client.exe digitally signed?
What is the SHA-256 hash of ScreenConnect.Client.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of ScreenConnect.Client.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.