File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is LYNX-
Only 1 of the 42 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this installer generically, while higher-confidence engines and completed observations from the test run provided no…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Install it only if it came from the developer's own website or an official app store.
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Antivirus results
1 of 42 flagged
- Flagged 1
- No detection 41
- No result 33
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen Today
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
Trapmine alone flagged the executable with a generic machine-learning label; no higher-confidence engine identified malware or a family. Three completed observations from the test run produced a combined clean label and recorded no high-risk technique with supporting evidence, making the lone detection likely erroneous, though the unsigned file has little distribution history.
Only 1 of the 42 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, and that result came from Trapmine using a generic machine-learning label. No higher-confidence engine detected it, and no malware family was identified. Three completed observations from the test run produced a combined clean label, with no named injection target, malicious host, or corroborated high-risk technique. Confidence is moderated because the executable is unsigned, was first seen on Oct 27, 2026, and has only four distinct submitters.
What We Detected
Only 1 of the 42 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable. Trapmine supplied a generic machine-learning label, while no higher-confidence engine detected malware and no specific family was identified.
Threat Behavior
Three completed observations from the test run produced a combined clean label. The only recorded contact was identified as analysis-environment background traffic, and the complete host check found no malicious or suspicious destination.
What To Do Now
The lone detection is most consistent with an erroneous alert. Because the installer is unsigned and has limited distribution history, obtain it from the publisher's official release channel, verify any published checksum, and keep security software enabled while installing.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- The executable is unsigned and had only four distinct submitters, so its publisher identity and wider reputation are not established.
- The file was first seen on Oct 27, 2026, and our static analysis of its bytes was not available.
- Trapmine produced one generic machine-learning detection, although no higher-confidence engine corroborated it.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- No higher-confidence antivirus engine flagged the file.
- Three completed observations from the test run produced a combined clean label and recorded no corroborated high-risk technique.
- The complete reputation check for the sole recorded contact found no malicious or suspicious host; that contact was also identified as analysis-environment background traffic.
- No packer or high-entropy code section was identified.
- The Windows executable is unsigned, so its publisher cannot be authenticated through code signing.
- It had only four distinct submitters and was first seen on Oct 27, 2026.
- Trapmine reported one generic machine-learning detection.
6 sources checked · all complete. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in 3 isolated tests; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 3isolated sandbox runs
- 31sandbox rule tags
- 3spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 28filesystem & mutex artifacts
Includes the sandbox verdicts, 31 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 10 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
1 of the 42 antivirus engines that checked it flags it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · all complete. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 1
The saved verdict treats these detections as likely false positives.
- Trapminesuspicious.low.ml.score
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 28, 2026, 2:15 AM UTC
- SHA-256
2df466d2ce05cdff14dda4f030b734b7b6045e96e80712b296b602ae2d057418- SHA-1
3795194d368ffaff43377fbfae1f67fc29047e1f- MD5
308cca7023a617fd14ec1d840cc289af
About this file
LYNX-0.1.19-alpha-setup-x64.exe says it is LYNX installer (LYNX), 9.1 MB.
- Claims to be
- LYNX installer (LYNX)From the file's own version information, written by whoever built it.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 9.1 MB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Oct 27, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 4 distinct sourcesRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 7.47 of 8
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), 2 matched signature rules, PE section entropy and packers and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is LYNX-0.1.19-alpha-setup-x64.exe safe?
What is LYNX-0.1.19-alpha-setup-x64.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected LYNX-0.1.19-alpha-setup-x64.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of LYNX-0.1.19-alpha-setup-x64.exe?
Is it safe to install LYNX-0.1.19-alpha-setup-x64.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of LYNX-0.1.19-alpha-setup-x64.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.