File scan report
Verdict Suspicious
Is sora_ 1st. exe safe? Treat it as suspicious.
Four of the 68 antivirus engines that checked it raised generic alerts, but no major detector, named malware family, or concrete runtime artefact corroborates those findings.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Why Suspicious? 4 antivirus engines flag it, but no major engine agrees; nothing else confirms it.
Limited evidence · One sign points to a problem; nothing else confirms it.
If it came from a link, an attachment or a stranger, delete it.
What to do now4 steps
Some signs point to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful. Treat it with caution.
What to do
Don't run it unless you're sure where it came from.
Check where you got it: an unexpected attachment, a link someone sent you or a re-upload is a red flag.
If you can't confirm where it came from, delete it. If you need the program, download it again from the publisher's own website.
If you already ran it
Stop using it, run a full scan with your antivirus and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts.
Not sure what to do?
Ask the MalwareTips community before you run it. If you already ran it, follow the cleanup guide.
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
4 of 68 flagged
- Flagged 4
- No detection 64
- No result 7
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 1mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
Four of the 68 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this unsigned and rarely submitted executable, although three detections came from less reliable engines and the remaining alert was generic. The sandbox runs did not reproduce harmful activity, but the absence of a verified publisher and established reputation means the file should not yet be trusted.
Four of the 68 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable, with one smaller alert and three less reliable alerts. None of the major antivirus engines detected it, and the labels do not identify a real malware family. The combined sandbox summary returned a clean assessment and recorded no named injection target, persistence, file it created, or sample-originated network contact. The and mappings lack the artefacts needed to show process injection or security tampering and therefore carry no adverse weight. However, the executable is unsigned and has appeared from only three submitters, leaving its origin and legitimacy weakly established. The generic detections consequently remain unresolved rather than confirmed as either malware or false positives.
What We Detected
Four of the 68 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable. DeepInstinct supplied one generic alert, while APEX, Bkav, and MaxSecure supplied less reliable generic alerts; none named a specific malware family. No major antivirus engines detected the file.
Threat Behavior
The sandbox runs did not return a malicious assessment and recorded no named injection target, persistence indicator, file it created, or sample-originated network contact. T1055 and T1562.001 were mapped without supporting artefacts, so they do not demonstrate process injection or interference with security controls. The file also shows no evidence of packing or unusually high-entropy code.
What To Do Now
The executable lacks a verified publisher and has very limited distribution history, so its source should be independently verified before execution. Keep security software enabled and avoid running it on an important system unless it came from a trusted, verifiable channel.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- The combined sandbox summary returned a clean assessment and recorded no named injection target, persistence indicator, dropped file, or sample-originated network contact.
- None of the major antivirus engines flagged the file, and all four detection labels are generic rather than identifying a malware family.
- The executable is not packed and its code section does not show unusually high entropy.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the major antivirus engines detected the file.
- The sandbox runs returned a clean assessment and recorded no concrete high-risk behaviour.
- No packing or unusually high-entropy code was identified.
- No persistence indicators, injected processes, files it created, or sample-originated network contacts were observed.
- Four antivirus engines raised generic malicious alerts.
- The executable is unsigned, so no publisher identity can be verified.
- The file has been submitted by only three distinct sources, providing little established reputation.
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 10sandbox rule tags
- 2spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 0filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Contains packed or scrambled code that is harder to inspect (common in installers too).
Moderate concern: Ran commands or a script on the test computer.
Note: Read basic details of the test computer, such as its Windows version.
Note: Looked through folders on the test computer (most installers do this).
Note: Loaded extra code modules while running.
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as code injection, but no injected program was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as contacting a server, but no contacted host was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as weakening security settings; no setting change was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as changing how Windows loads code; nothing confirms it.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 3: FileSeen in the test run
sora_1st.exe
2e4fbe9e5f1b016f6ebc1a13924ee1350e29e15141f2b0710d020507887f3d28
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 3: ProcessSeen in the test run
sora_1st.exe
"C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\sora_1st.exe"
Test run - Evidence 3 of 3: ProcessSeen in the test run
sora_1st.exe
"C:\Users\user\Desktop\sora_1st.exe"
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
3 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
What this file did when executed
This file was run in a sandbox and its runtime behaviour was observed.
Sandbox verdicts
1- VT: CLEANclean
Techniques observed in the sandbox
10MITRE ATT&CK techniques the sandbox mapped. Highlighted ones are rare in normal software; the others are common in legitimate programs too.
- T1027· Obfuscated code
- T1027.002· Obfuscated code
- T1055· Process injection
- T1059· Runs commands
- T1071· Application protocol
- T1082· System recon
- T1083· Scans your files
- T1129· Loads modules
- T1562.001· Disables security
- T1574· Execution hijack
Observed activity
Processes started
2Programs the file ran, with their command lines.
sora_1st.exe"C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\sora_1st.exe"sora_1st.exe"C:\Users\user\Desktop\sora_1st.exe"
Chapter 04
Technical details
4 of the 68 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 4
- APEXMalicious
- BkavW32.Malware.5CB1D1B0
- DeepInstinctMALICIOUS
- MaxSecureTrojan.Malware.300983.susgen
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 15, 2026, 9:30 PM UTC
- SHA-256
2e4fbe9e5f1b016f6ebc1a13924ee1350e29e15141f2b0710d020507887f3d28- SHA-1
171ebdbfe068f72250d3b19f7e888d4865dcf8d9- MD5
26b0d742d45d59a821a95b2377331807
About this file
sora_1st.exe is a Win32 EXE file of 451.1 kB.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 451.1 kB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Sep 2, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 3 distinct sourcesRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 6.90 of 8
First scanned Updated
Verdict history
- Not fully confirmed
- Suspiciousafter the analysis was completed
Ratings change when antivirus engines, our checks or MalwareTips staff learn more about a file.
Antivirus consensus
4 of 68 engines flagged this file
7 of the 75 engines returned no result for this file (file type not supported, or the scan did not finish), so they did not check it.
- Tier-116 engines0flagged
- Tier-235 engines1flagged
- Low-trust17 engines3flagged
View all 75 engine results
- APEXMalicious: Malicious
- BkavMalicious: W32.Malware.5CB1D1B0
- DeepInstinctMalicious: MALICIOUS
- MaxSecureMalicious: Trojan.Malware.300983.susgen
- AcronisClean
- AhnLab-V3Clean
- AlibabaClean
- alibabacloudClean
- ALYacClean
- Antiy-AVLClean
- ArcabitClean
- AvastNo result
- Avast-MobileNo result
- AVGNo result
- AviraClean
- BitDefenderClean
- BitDefenderFalxNo result
- CAT-QuickHealClean
- ClamAVClean
- CMCClean
- CrowdStrikeClean
- CTXClean
- CylanceClean
- CynetClean
- DrWebClean
- ElasticClean
- EmsisoftClean
- ESET-NOD32Clean
- F-SecureClean
- FortinetClean
- GDataClean
- GoogleClean
- GridinsoftClean
- huorongClean
- IkarusClean
- JiangminClean
- K7AntiVirusClean
- K7GWClean
- KasperskyClean
- KingsoftClean
- LionicClean
- MalwarebytesClean
- McAfeeDClean
- MicrosoftClean
- MicroWorld-eScanClean
- NANO-AntivirusClean
- PaloaltoClean
- PandaClean
- RisingClean
- SangforClean
- SentinelOneClean
- SkyhighNo result
- SophosClean
- SUPERAntiSpywareClean
- SymantecClean
- SymantecMobileInsightNo result
- TACHYONClean
- tehtrisClean
- TencentClean
- TrapmineClean
- TrellixENSClean
- TrendMicroClean
- TrendMicro-HouseCallClean
- TrustlookNo result
- VaristClean
- VBA32Clean
- VIPREClean
- VirITClean
- ViRobotClean
- WebrootClean
- XcitiumClean
- YandexClean
- ZillyaClean
- ZoneAlarmClean
- ZonerClean
Signatures and behavior heuristics
Low-severity pattern matches — worth noting but not on their own cause for alarm.
VirusTotal's sandbox summary maps this run to MITRE T1055 (Process Injection), but no injected process of the sample's own was recorded (the analysis VM's own WMI adapter, crash handlers and Chrome updater are not counted). VirusTotal maps T1055 on about half of all files no engine flags, so the mapping alone is not evidence of injection.
EvidenceT1055 (sandbox MITRE mapping)
Section entropy & packers
No high-entropy executable section or known packer signature was detected. Data and resource sections can still have high entropy without indicating packed code.
How widely this file has been seen
Rarely uploaded, and first seen more than two weeks ago. Often niche legitimate software or internal tooling; not a strong malware signal on its own.
Chapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is sora_1st.exe safe, or is it malware?
What is sora_1st.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected sora_1st.exe?
What should I do if I already ran sora_1st.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of sora_1st.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of sora_1st.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.