Is Sexcraft_0.14.5.7z safe?
No antivirus engine detected this year-old 7-Zip archive, and independent threat-intelligence checks found no known malware or matching research rules.
All 75 antivirus engines reported no malicious or suspicious result, including 17 tier-1 engines. The archive also lacks known-malware and research-rule matches, although no runtime analysis was completed and its extracted contents should still be scanned before opening.
2efe032e99b8df0ab9…42e4bf4fe167fdRecommended next actions
Before opening or extracting
Open or extract it only when its sender or download source has been independently verified.
If you already opened or extracted it
Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
All 75 antivirus engines reported no malicious or suspicious result, including 17 tier-1 engines. The archive also lacks known-malware and research-rule matches, although no runtime analysis was completed and its extracted contents should still be scanned before opening.
Static scanning produced zero malicious or suspicious detections across 75 antivirus engines. All 17 reporting tier-1 engines were clean, including Microsoft, Kaspersky, BitDefender, ESET-NOD32, and Fortinet. No known-malware record or matching research rule corroborated a threat. The file has been observed for 362 days and submitted five times, reducing concern associated with a newly appearing archive. However, no sandbox execution occurred, and no complete host-reputation result is available, so this assessment does not independently validate every archived component at runtime.
What We Detected
The 7-Zip archive received 0 malicious and 0 suspicious results from 75 antivirus engines. Seventeen tier-1 engines reported no detection, and the available external-intelligence checks found no known-malware record or matching research rule.
Threat Behavior
No completed runtime observation is available because behaviour is null. The archive therefore has no observed execution, persistence, process, or network behavior in this evidence, and no complete host-reputation cross-check was performed.
What To Do Now
Keep endpoint protection enabled, extract the archive only from a trusted source, and scan its individual contents before opening or running them. Avoid launching unexpected executables or scripts contained inside the archive.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- behaviour=null, so the archive and any extracted contents were not observed executing.
- contactedHosts=null, meaning no complete host-reputation result is available.
- prevalence.uniqueSources=5 provides only modest distribution evidence.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/75 engines reported malicious or suspicious
- 17 tier-1 engines reported clean
- No MalwareBazaar match
- No YARAify rule matches
- Observed for 362 days
- No completed sandbox observation of extracted contents
- No complete contacted-host reputation result
- Only five submissions from five sources
Keep security software enabled and scan every extracted file before opening it. Obtain the archive from a trusted source and discard it if its contents are unexpected.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 0 / 75engines flagged
- 5sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
No completed runtime observation is available for this file.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceRuntime coverageObserved at - 03
The hash has been submitted 5 times from 5 sources.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
0 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- Sexcraft_0.14.5.7z
- Format
- 7ZIP
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 1.4 MB
- Last analyzed
- Oct 2, 2026, 5:49 AM UTC
2efe032e99b8df0ab954f201164438479327beda16f333ae9a42e4bf4fe167fdSafety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.
- Recovery step 01
Open or extract it only when its sender or download source has been independently verified.
- Recovery step 02
A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.
- Recovery step 03
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is Sexcraft_0.14.5.7z safe?
What is Sexcraft_0.14.5.7z?
How many antivirus engines detected Sexcraft_0.14.5.7z?
What is the SHA-256 hash of Sexcraft_0.14.5.7z?
Is it safe to open or extract Sexcraft_0.14.5.7z?
How up to date is this analysis of Sexcraft_0.14.5.7z?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.