File scan report
Verdict Low Risk
Is harbour- sailwarden safe? Not fully confirmed.
New unsigned ARM ELF with zero engine detections but only one submission so far.
Why not Safe? Only one source had seen it when we scanned it.
Limited evidence · Nothing points to a problem, but little confirms who made it.
Re-submit after broader distribution or run the binary in a sandbox to gather behavioural data before trusting it.
Good practice2 tips
Low Risk: no threat found, but we could not fully confirm this file.
Get it from the publisher's own website or app store, not from a re-upload or a link someone sent you.
Keep your security software on, and stop if the file does anything you didn't expect.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
0 of 63 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 63
- No result 11
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Not run
- First seen 3mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 2 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
63 of the 63 antivirus engines that checked it scanned the file and none flagged it. The binary is a fresh, unsigned ARM shared library with no sandbox or external-intel hits.
No complete contacted-host reputation result was available. However, the sample is only hours old, has a single submission, and is unsigned, so the evidence is too limited to issue a confident safe verdict. The absence of any YARA, CIRCL, or MalwareBazaar signals further supports a neutral stance rather than a malicious classification.
What We Detected
74 engines scanned the 1.5 MB ARM64 ELF shared library; 63 reported and all returned clean. No major antivirus engines raised an alert and no family consensus exists.
Threat Behavior
No sandbox execution data, no files it created, and no contacted hosts were recorded. External intelligence sources (CIRCL, MalwareBazaar, YARAify) returned zero matches.
What To Do Now
Re-scan after wider distribution or sandbox execution. Until then, treat the file as unverified due to its newness and lack of signing.
Where this verdict could be wrong1 caveat
- rare and prevalence and zero-age submission mean limited historical context; a genuinely new malicious ELF could also show zero detections initially.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- Zero detections from 17 major antivirus engines
- No external intelligence hits
- Unsigned binary
- rare and prevalence
- Zero days since first submission
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
Technical details
None of the 63 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Jul 9, 2026, 8:32 AM UTC
- SHA-256
3d18e03f14303031376611744c06417d3987175ebe10555f0df216d7299ddeea- SHA-1
8ee5e394d4a8d2d6d698796d40a40f432f974cd3- MD5
0b9e658f58a171690ccbe99550c20ca1
About this file
harbour-sailwarden is an ELF file of 1.6 MB.
- Type and size
- ELF · 1.6 MB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Jul 9, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 1 sourceRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
First scanned
Antivirus consensus
0 of 63 engines flagged this file
11 of the 74 engines returned no result for this file (file type not supported, or the scan did not finish), so they did not check it.
- Tier-118 engines0flagged
- Tier-234 engines0flagged
- Low-trust11 engines0flagged
View all 74 engine results
- AcronisClean
- AhnLab-V3Clean
- AlibabaNo result
- alibabacloudClean
- ALYacClean
- Antiy-AVLClean
- APEXNo result
- ArcabitClean
- AvastClean
- Avast-MobileClean
- AVGClean
- AviraClean
- BitDefenderClean
- BitDefenderFalxNo result
- BkavClean
- CAT-QuickHealClean
- ClamAVClean
- CMCClean
- CrowdStrikeClean
- CTXClean
- CylanceNo result
- CynetClean
- DrWebClean
- ElasticClean
- EmsisoftClean
- ESET-NOD32Clean
- F-SecureClean
- FortinetClean
- GDataClean
- GoogleClean
- GridinsoftClean
- huorongClean
- IkarusClean
- JiangminClean
- K7AntiVirusClean
- K7GWClean
- KasperskyClean
- KingsoftClean
- LionicClean
- MalwarebytesClean
- MaxSecureClean
- McAfeeDClean
- MicrosoftClean
- MicroWorld-eScanClean
- NANO-AntivirusClean
- PaloaltoNo result
- PandaClean
- RisingClean
- SangforClean
- SentinelOneNo result
- SkyhighClean
- SophosClean
- SUPERAntiSpywareClean
- SymantecClean
- SymantecMobileInsightNo result
- TACHYONClean
- tehtrisNo result
- TencentClean
- TrapmineNo result
- TrellixENSClean
- TrendMicroClean
- TrendMicro-HouseCallClean
- TrustlookNo result
- VaristClean
- VBA32Clean
- VIPREClean
- VirITClean
- ViRobotClean
- WebrootNo result
- XcitiumClean
- YandexClean
- ZillyaClean
- ZoneAlarmClean
- ZonerClean
How widely this file has been seen
Rarely uploaded, and first seen more than two weeks ago. Often niche legitimate software or internal tooling; not a strong malware signal on its own.
Chapter 04
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 5 questions people ask most about this file.
Is harbour-sailwarden safe?
What is harbour-sailwarden?
How many antivirus engines detected harbour-sailwarden?
What is the SHA-256 hash of harbour-sailwarden?
How up to date is this analysis of harbour-sailwarden?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.