Is glazed-26.1.2-n-17.1.jar safe?
No antivirus engine detected the JAR, and its sandbox run produced no malicious conclusion, although several offensive MITRE technique mappings warrant ordinary caution.
None of 75 antivirus engines flagged this JAR, including all 17 tier-1 engines, and the completed sandbox run did not produce a malicious conclusion. Three offensive MITRE mappings are the main concern, but they lack corroboration from engine detections, known-malware intelligence, network activity, or malicious dropped children.
3d3f6c04cbd36b9e15…983cb5691d77ecRecommended next actions
Before opening or running
Open or run it only when its publisher and download source have been independently verified.
If you already opened or ran it
Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
None of 75 antivirus engines flagged this JAR, including all 17 tier-1 engines, and the completed sandbox run did not produce a malicious conclusion. Three offensive MITRE mappings are the main concern, but they lack corroboration from engine detections, known-malware intelligence, network activity, or malicious dropped children.
The strongest evidence is the complete absence of detections across 75 antivirus engines, with all 17 tier-1 engines silent. One completed sandbox run did not produce a malicious conclusion and recorded no contacted domains, IPs, or URLs. It nevertheless mapped activity to T1055, T1543.002, and T1562.001, so the behavioral evidence is not entirely routine. No known-malware intelligence or YARA rules matched, and none of nine inspected children was identified as malicious, although their individual status remains unknown. The sample also has moderate circulation across 727 sources and 852 submissions, reducing concern that it is an isolated new artifact. No complete contacted-host reputation result is available, but the recorded run contained no network contacts to cross-check.
What We Detected
None of 75 antivirus engines flagged the JAR, including all 17 tier-1 engines. No malware family was identified, and external intelligence returned no CIRCL, MalwareBazaar, or YARAify match. The file has appeared across 727 sources in 852 submissions, indicating moderate circulation.
Threat Behavior
One completed sandbox run did not issue a malicious conclusion and recorded no contacted domains, IP addresses, or URLs. However, its activity was mapped to T1055, T1543.002, and T1562.001, covering possible process injection, service execution, and impairment of defenses. These mappings are risk indicators rather than proof of hostile intent, and they are not corroborated by antivirus detections or malicious child files. Nine written or dropped files were inspected without a malicious child being identified, but their individual verdicts remain unknown. No complete host-reputation cross-check is available because contactedHosts was not saved.
What To Do Now
Use the JAR only if it came from the expected project or distribution channel, and keep endpoint protection enabled. If its origin is uncertain, verify its checksum against the publisher's release and test it in an isolated environment before allowing access to sensitive data.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- The runtime mapping includes T1055 process injection, T1543.002 service execution, and T1562.001 defense impairment; these capabilities deserve caution even though the sandbox did not issue a malicious verdict.
- All nine dropped children have unknown individual verdicts, so droppedChildren.hasMaliciousChild=false does not establish that every child is benign.
- contactedHosts=null means no complete host-reputation result is available.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/75 antivirus engines reported a malicious or suspicious result.
- All 17 tier-1 engines reported no detection.
- behaviour.hasMaliciousSandboxVerdict=false across one completed sandbox run.
- No network contacts were recorded during the completed run.
- No CIRCL, MalwareBazaar, or YARAify match was found.
- Runtime evidence maps activity to T1055, T1543.002, and T1562.001.
- The MalwareTips.Synth.ProcessInjection heuristic fired on the T1055 mapping.
- Nine dropped children have unknown individual verdicts.
- No complete contacted-host reputation cross-check is available.
Use the file only from a trusted release source and verify its SHA-256 against the publisher's published checksum when available. Keep endpoint protection enabled and isolate it if the origin cannot be confirmed.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
Complete1 isolated runtime environment contributed observations.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
Complete1 signature or behavior rule matched.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime flight recorder
Capture complete- 1isolated sandbox run
- 15MITRE ATT&CK techniques
- 15spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 15filesystem & mutex artifacts
What this file did when executed
This file was detonated in 1 sandbox and its runtime behaviour was observed.
Adversary techniques mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
- C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_<USER>\980
- C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage\3903daac9bc4a3b7.timestamp
- C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage\17dfc292991c8786.timestamp
- C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_user
- C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_user\6172
- C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_user\4744
- /tmp/hsperfdata_root/3594
Files this sample writes at runtime
This file drops 9 children at runtime. None are currently flagged malicious in our cache.
- 696b93125f11c6a6dd36…da03cfNever scannednever seen before
- 7a3134ee029463676843…4a45dbNever scannednever seen before
- 2ab3c73485c66f9107cb…5ce756Never scannednever seen before
- c1de3a9376fdaef0ba6a…308b70Never scannednever seen before
- d87c5f3cdfb5b7c0510e…1ade9eNever scannednever seen before
- 61625fd8b084f70f242d…55abd2Never scannednever seen before
- 50c82f36208ed8040447…2d7843Never scannednever seen before
- 8e8711854186c68e2368…4a3c7cNever scannednever seen before
- 759aafcfa2395ce1b800…2af0f7Never scannednever seen before
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 1rule hit recorded
- 0 / 75engines flagged
- 727sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
1 high-confidence signature or behavior rule matched this file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceDerivedSourceSignature and behavior rulesObserved at - 03
The hash has been submitted 852 times from 727 sources.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at - 04
Scanned file: glazed-26.1.2-n-17.1.jar — 3d3f6c04cbd36b9e156b9a9fa66e160e326739adf6301278e2983cb5691d77ec
ProvenanceObservedSourceUploaded fileObserved at - 05
Observed process — "C:\Program Files\Java\jre-1.8\bin\javaw.exe" -jar "C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\runtime.jar"
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 06
Observed process — C:\Windows\system32\icacls.exe C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage /grant "everyone":(OI)(CI)M
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 07
File written: 980 — C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_<USER>\980
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 08
File written: 3903daac9bc4a3b7.timestamp — C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage\3903daac9bc4a3b7.timestamp
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
Signatures and behavior heuristics
A community signature or high-severity behavioral heuristic matched. Signatures identify known patterns; heuristics are strong leads but are not proof on their own.
The saved runtime evidence maps this activity to MITRE T1055 (Process Injection). The mapping supports possible process injection, but it does not prove the exact injection method or the operator's intent.
Evidence"C:\Program Files\Java\jre-1.8\bin\javaw.exe" -jar "C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\runtime.jar"
0 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- glazed-26.1.2-n-17.1.jar
- Format
- JAR
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 1020.8 KB
- Last analyzed
- Oct 1, 2026, 4:26 PM UTC
3d3f6c04cbd36b9e156b9a9fa66e160e326739adf6301278e2983cb5691d77ecSafety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.
- Recovery step 01
Open or run it only when its publisher and download source have been independently verified.
- Recovery step 02
A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.
- Recovery step 03
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is glazed-26.1.2-n-17.1.jar safe?
What is glazed-26.1.2-n-17.1.jar?
How many antivirus engines detected glazed-26.1.2-n-17.1.jar?
What is the SHA-256 hash of glazed-26.1.2-n-17.1.jar?
Is it safe to open or run glazed-26.1.2-n-17.1.jar?
How up to date is this analysis of glazed-26.1.2-n-17.1.jar?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.