Is Spice and Wolf - _Tabi no Tochuu_ (FULL Opening) _ ENGLISH ver _ AmaLee.mp4 safe?
No antivirus engine detected a threat in this MP4, although its very recent appearance and lack of runtime analysis modestly limit assurance.
All 74 antivirus engines were free of malicious or suspicious detections, including 17 high-trust engines. The sample is an MP4 with no external threat-intelligence matches, though it is newly observed and has no completed runtime or contacted-host assessment.
3e7b7877365688235c…bfaf73b5057f17Recommended next actions
Before viewing
View it only when its sender or download source is one you trust.
If you already viewed it
Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
All 74 antivirus engines were free of malicious or suspicious detections, including 17 high-trust engines. The sample is an MP4 with no external threat-intelligence matches, though it is newly observed and has no completed runtime or contacted-host assessment.
The strongest evidence is complete agreement across 74 antivirus engines, with no malicious or suspicious detections. Seventeen high-trust engines, including BitDefender, ESET, Kaspersky, and Microsoft, reported no detection. The sample is an MP4, so code-signing status is not relevant, and no external research match or YARA rule was found. However, the file was first observed today and has limited submission history. No completed runtime observation or contacted-host reputation result is available, so the conclusion rests primarily on static scanning.
What We Detected
None of 74 antivirus engines flagged the MP4 as malicious or suspicious. Seventeen high-trust engines reported no detection, and there were no MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, or YARAify matches.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox observation is available, so runtime behavior was not observed. The contacted-host reputation check was also unavailable; no claims about network activity can therefore be made.
What To Do Now
The file can be handled as ordinary media while keeping endpoint protection enabled. Because it was only recently observed, obtain it from a trusted source and use an updated media player before opening it.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- prevalence.classification=rare_new: the file was first observed today and has only one known submitting source.
- behaviour=null and contactedHosts=null, so runtime activity and contacted-host reputation were not assessed.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/74 antivirus engines reported malicious or suspicious findings
- 17 high-trust engines reported no detection
- No MalwareBazaar or CIRCL match
- No YARAify rules matched
- MP4 media format with no suspicious filename indicators
- First observed today with only one known submitting source
- No completed runtime observation
- No complete contacted-host reputation assessment
Keep endpoint protection enabled and open the MP4 with an updated media player. Prefer a trusted download source because the hash has only a short observation history.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 74 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 0 / 74engines flagged
- 1sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
0 of 74 antivirus engines flagged the file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
No completed runtime observation is available for this file.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceRuntime coverageObserved at - 03
The hash has been submitted 3 times from 1 source.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
0 of 74 engines flagged this file
View all 74 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Barely seen in the wild and first surfaced recently. That limits reputation evidence, but rarity alone is not proof of malware.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- Spice and Wolf - _Tabi no Tochuu_ (FULL Opening) _ ENGLISH ver _ AmaLee.mp4
- Format
- MP4
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 18.9 MB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 21, 2026, 10:15 AM UTC
3e7b7877365688235cc813f3761d25dfc14d659d790e59ed9fbfaf73b5057f17Safety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.
- Recovery step 01
View it only when its sender or download source is one you trust.
- Recovery step 02
A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.
- Recovery step 03
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is this file safe?
What is this file?
How many antivirus engines detected this file?
What is the SHA-256 hash of this file?
Is it safe to view this file?
How up to date is this analysis of this file?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.