Is Faithful 32x - 1.20.1.zip safe?
None of 73 antivirus engines detected the ZIP, including 17 tier-1 engines, although its limited history and absent runtime analysis warrant routine caution.
The archive produced no malicious or suspicious detections across 73 antivirus engines, and no curated intelligence source linked it to malware. Confidence is tempered because it is recently observed, has only one recorded submission, and lacks completed runtime analysis, so obtain it from the expected resource-pack source and scan extracted contents.
4292c81303eecf5ef4…3bc9662ba069d8Recommended next actions
Before opening or extracting
Open or extract it only when its sender or download source has been independently verified.
If you already opened or extracted it
Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
The archive produced no malicious or suspicious detections across 73 antivirus engines, and no curated intelligence source linked it to malware. Confidence is tempered because it is recently observed, has only one recorded submission, and lacks completed runtime analysis, so obtain it from the expected resource-pack source and scan extracted contents.
All 73 antivirus engines returned no malicious or suspicious finding, including 17 tier-1 engines such as BitDefender, ESET-NOD32, Kaspersky, and Microsoft. Research intelligence produced no MalwareBazaar match, CIRCL entry, or YARAify rule hit. No heuristic rule, brand mismatch, malicious child, or confirmed offensive-tool label appears in the evidence. However, the archive is recently observed and has only one recorded submission, so its reputation is not yet well established. No completed sandbox observation or complete contacted-host reputation result is available, which limits conclusions about files inside the archive when opened.
What We Detected
None of 73 antivirus engines flagged the ZIP as malicious or suspicious. All 17 reporting tier-1 engines returned no detection, including BitDefender, ESET-NOD32, Kaspersky, and Microsoft. MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, and YARAify supplied no corroborating threat-intelligence hit.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox run is available, so runtime behavior was not observed. There is also no complete contacted-host reputation result. The evidence contains no malicious dropped child, triggered heuristic, brand mismatch, or confirmed hacktool label.
What To Do Now
The main limitation is the archive's short history: it was first submitted 12 days ago and has only one recorded submission. Download it only from the expected official or well-established resource-pack channel, keep endpoint protection enabled, scan the extracted contents, and verify that they contain only the expected resource files before use.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- prevalence.classification=rare_new: the file was first submitted 12 days ago and has only one recorded submission.
- behaviour=null means the archive was not observed executing or being opened in a completed sandbox run.
- contactedHosts=null means no complete reputation cross-check is available for any potential network contacts.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/73 engines reported a malicious or suspicious result
- All 17 reporting tier-1 engines returned no detection
- No MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, or YARAify hit
- No triggered heuristics or brand mismatch
- No malicious dropped-child evidence
- Recently observed archive with only one recorded submission
- No completed runtime observation
- No complete contacted-host reputation cross-check
- ZIP contents were not independently described in the supplied evidence
Use the archive only if it came from the expected official or trusted resource-pack source. Keep endpoint protection enabled and scan the extracted files before installing or copying them into an application directory.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 73 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 0 / 73engines flagged
- 1sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
0 of 73 antivirus engines flagged the file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
No completed runtime observation is available for this file.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceRuntime coverageObserved at - 03
The hash has been submitted 1 time from 1 source.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
0 of 73 engines flagged this file
View all 73 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Barely seen in the wild and first surfaced recently. That limits reputation evidence, but rarity alone is not proof of malware.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- Faithful 32x - 1.20.1.zip
- Format
- ZIP
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 10.6 MB
- Last analyzed
- Oct 2, 2026, 8:54 PM UTC
4292c81303eecf5ef4a6d44d67486267df865b51949803d8323bc9662ba069d8Safety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.
- Recovery step 01
Open or extract it only when its sender or download source has been independently verified.
- Recovery step 02
A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.
- Recovery step 03
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is Faithful 32x - 1.20.1.zip safe?
What is Faithful 32x - 1.20.1.zip?
How many antivirus engines detected Faithful 32x - 1.20.1.zip?
What is the SHA-256 hash of Faithful 32x - 1.20.1.zip?
Is it safe to open or extract Faithful 32x - 1.20.1.zip?
How up to date is this analysis of Faithful 32x - 1.20.1.zip?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.