File scan report
Verdict Suspicious
Is this PDF document safe? Treat it as suspicious.
PDF with embedded JavaScript and auto-action tags submitted only twice in the last day.
Why Suspicious? Embedded JavaScript in PDF.
Limited evidence · One sign points to a problem; nothing else confirms it.
Treat as suspicious until opened in a controlled environment or replaced with a verified clean copy from the source.
What to do now4 steps
Some signs point to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful. Treat it with caution.
What to do
Don't open it unless you're sure where it came from.
Check where you got it: an unexpected attachment, a link someone sent you or a re-upload is a red flag.
If you can't confirm who sent it, delete it, or ask the sender to confirm they sent it.
If you already opened it
Stop using it, run a full scan with your antivirus and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts.
Not sure what to do?
Ask the MalwareTips community before you run it. If you already ran it, follow the cleanup guide.
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
0 of 58 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 58
- No result 16
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Not run
- First seen 3mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
4 points against it and 3 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
No engines flagged the file, yet the combination of embedded JS, autoaction tags, and rare and status on a PDF creates mixed signals. The lack of any positive reputation or signing history prevents a clean verdict.
The file carries 'js-embedded' and 'autoaction' tags on a PDF that is only hours old and has been seen by just two submitters. Unsigned status and complete absence of similar-hash history leave no benign anchor. These factors together produce a borderline case that warrants caution rather than outright clearance.
What We Detected
62 of the 58 antivirus engines that checked it reported on the sample; none returned a malicious or suspicious label. The PDF carries tags indicating embedded JavaScript and automatic actions. No digital signature is present and the file has only been submitted twice since first seen on Jul 11, 2026.
Threat Behavior
PDFs containing JavaScript can execute code when opened, a technique used by some document-based threats. No sandbox execution data or contacted hosts are available to confirm or refute malicious behaviour. The combination of autoaction tags and embedded JS on a rare file is atypical for legitimate language certificates.
What To Do Now
Do not open the PDF in a standard reader. Scan it with an up-to-date local antivirus product that supports PDF analysis, or open it inside a sandboxed or virtualised environment. If the document is expected, request a fresh copy from the issuing authority.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- Zero engine detections could indicate a genuinely clean document, but the combination of embedded JS + autoaction on a rare PDF is atypical for legitimate Italian-language certificates.
- No sandbox execution data available; malicious JS in PDFs often only triggers on open, so absence of behaviour data does not confirm safety.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- Zero engine detections
- No adversarial filename patterns
- No brand mismatch
- Embedded JavaScript in PDF
- Auto-action tags present
- Rare new submission (2 submitters)
- File
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
Technical details
None of the 58 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- File name
- PDF document
- Format
- Size
- 8.0 MB
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Last analyzed
- Jul 11, 2026, 2:20 PM UTC
- SHA-256
42d44097a46cad5fdc5466598a0aac581b25469e0e735975446338fbf5a4a512- SHA-1
e7e778064adfdd7bfc5137a20016aad0853d2f6a- MD5
a8be4b1da25793da4752bcb5f40a0c29
First scanned
Verdict history
- Not fully confirmed
- Suspiciousafter a new scan
Ratings change when antivirus engines, our checks or MalwareTips staff learn more about a file.
Includes every engine result (74) and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is this PDF document safe, or is it malware?
What is this PDF document?
How many antivirus engines detected this PDF document?
I already downloaded and opened this PDF document — what should I do?
What is the SHA-256 hash of this PDF document?
How up to date is this analysis of this PDF document?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.