File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is this PDF document safe? Yes, no threats found.
No antivirus engine flagged this PDF, and no external intelligence or static rule-based supplied evidence linking it to a known threat.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Open it only if you trust the person or website it came from.
Keep your security software and system updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
0 of 62 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 62
- No result 12
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Not run
- First seen 2mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 5 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
All 62 antivirus engines that checked it were free of malicious or suspicious detections, including 16 major antivirus engines that reported no detection. External intelligence and static rules also produced no threat indicators, although no completed runtime or contacted-host analysis is available.
The strongest evidence is the complete absence of malicious or suspicious detections across 74 antivirus engines. Researcher-curated intelligence produced no MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, or YARAify hit, while no static behaviour rule matched. The five prior PDF decisions offer only weak support because they match by file type rather than content, signer, or binary structure. No completed observation from the test run or comprehensive contacted-host check is available, so the assessment cannot rule out behavior that static scanning might miss.
What We Detected
No malicious or suspicious detections were returned by 74 antivirus engines. Sixteen major antivirus engines, including BitDefender, Kaspersky, Microsoft, ESET-NOD32, and Fortinet, reported no detection, and no engine family consensus was present. MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, and YARAify supplied no corroborating threat intelligence, and no static behaviour rule matched.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox observation is available, so runtime actions such as embedded-script execution, process creation, or network access were not observed. A complete contacted-host reputation result is also unavailable. The five similar records were prior PDF decisions matched only by file type, making them limited contextual support rather than strong hash-level evidence.
What To Do Now
The available evidence supports ordinary handling, but the document should still be opened with an updated PDF reader and security software enabled. If the document was unexpected or requests credentials, payments, macros, downloads, or external links, verify the sender before interacting with it.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- No completed sandbox run was recorded, so potentially harmful PDF actions were not tested through completed observation from the test run.
- No contacted-host reputation result was saved, meaning no complete host-reputation cross-check is available.
- A count of 1 distinct submitter and a count of 1 submission provide limited independent prevalence evidence.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/62 engines reported a malicious or suspicious result.
- No major antivirus engines flagged it and 16 major antivirus engines reported it clean.
- The hash is not listed in the MalwareBazaar malware database.
- No community YARA rule matched.
- triggeredHeuristics contains no fired rules.
- No completed observation from the test run is available.
- No complete contacted-host reputation cross-check is available.
- Only one source and one submission are recorded for prevalence.
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
Technical details
None of the 62 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- File name
- PDF document
- Format
- Size
- 349.1 kB
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Last analyzed
- Sep 8, 2026, 6:47 PM UTC
- SHA-256
45ca5880ac8cafe30223e0b199993afc2ee3d157af524f488d767f1c36cb3432- SHA-1
446c1961153c6d14ec29b97c911562fc0534f03a- MD5
a9fbea6d199269defaf7aaf3f6598718
First scanned Updated
Antivirus consensus
0 of 62 engines flagged this file
12 of the 74 engines returned no result for this file (file type not supported, or the scan did not finish), so they did not check it.
- Tier-117 engines0flagged
- Tier-233 engines0flagged
- Low-trust12 engines0flagged
View all 74 engine results
- AcronisClean
- AhnLab-V3Clean
- AlibabaNo result
- alibabacloudClean
- ALYacClean
- Antiy-AVLClean
- APEXNo result
- ArcabitClean
- AvastClean
- Avast-MobileNo result
- AVGClean
- AviraClean
- BitDefenderClean
- BitDefenderFalxNo result
- BkavClean
- CAT-QuickHealClean
- ClamAVClean
- CMCClean
- CrowdStrikeClean
- CTXClean
- CylanceClean
- CynetClean
- DrWebClean
- ElasticNo result
- EmsisoftClean
- ESET-NOD32Clean
- F-SecureClean
- FortinetClean
- GDataClean
- GoogleClean
- GridinsoftClean
- huorongClean
- IkarusNo result
- JiangminClean
- K7AntiVirusClean
- K7GWClean
- KasperskyClean
- KingsoftClean
- LionicClean
- MalwarebytesClean
- MaxSecureClean
- McAfeeDClean
- MicrosoftClean
- MicroWorld-eScanClean
- NANO-AntivirusClean
- PaloaltoNo result
- PandaClean
- RisingClean
- SangforClean
- SentinelOneClean
- SkyhighClean
- SophosClean
- SUPERAntiSpywareClean
- SymantecClean
- SymantecMobileInsightNo result
- TACHYONClean
- tehtrisNo result
- TencentClean
- TrapmineNo result
- TrellixENSClean
- TrendMicroClean
- TrendMicro-HouseCallClean
- TrustlookNo result
- VaristClean
- VBA32Clean
- VIPREClean
- VirITClean
- ViRobotClean
- WebrootNo result
- XcitiumClean
- YandexClean
- ZillyaClean
- ZoneAlarmClean
- ZonerClean
How widely this file has been seen
Rarely uploaded, and first seen more than two weeks ago. Often niche legitimate software or internal tooling; not a strong malware signal on its own.
Chapter 04
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is this PDF document safe?
What is this PDF document?
How many antivirus engines detected this PDF document?
What is the SHA-256 hash of this PDF document?
Is it safe to open this PDF document?
How up to date is this analysis of this PDF document?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.