Is wp13469250-devil-may-cry-aesthetic-wallpapers.jpg safe?
None of 74 antivirus engines detected the JPEG, including 17 reporting tier-one engines, and curated threat-intelligence checks produced no corroborating indicators.
The JPEG drew no malicious or suspicious detections from 74 antivirus engines, with all 17 reporting tier-one engines finding nothing. Curated intelligence checks also produced no hits, although this exact hash is newly observed and no runtime analysis was completed.
4710a12dbbdba86723…d6ff145bd0efc2Recommended next actions
Before viewing
View it only when its sender or download source is one you trust.
If you already viewed it
Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
The JPEG drew no malicious or suspicious detections from 74 antivirus engines, with all 17 reporting tier-one engines finding nothing. Curated intelligence checks also produced no hits, although this exact hash is newly observed and no runtime analysis was completed.
Static scanning found 0 malicious and 0 suspicious results among 74 antivirus engines. All 17 reporting tier-one engines were silent, and no engine supplied a malware-family label. The file is identified as a JPEG image, so absent code signing and PE analysis are not concerns for this format. CIRCL, MalwareBazaar, and YARAify supplied no corroborating threat indicators. The exact hash is newly observed, while runtime and contacted-host evidence are unavailable, but those limitations do not outweigh the broad static agreement.
What We Detected
The 123,416-byte file is identified as a JPEG image. None of 74 antivirus engines reported it as malicious or suspicious, including all 17 reporting tier-one engines, and no malware-family consensus exists. CIRCL, MalwareBazaar, and YARAify produced no matching threat intelligence.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox observation is available because behaviour is null. The contacted-host cross-check was also not completed or saved, so no conclusion about network reputation can be drawn. No dropped malicious child or executable-specific PE evidence is present.
What To Do Now
The image can be handled normally while keeping endpoint protection enabled. Because the exact hash is newly observed, rescan it if the file changes, fails to render as an image, or behaves unexpectedly when opened.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- prevalence.classification=rare_new with 1 submission from 1 source, so the exact hash has little history.
- behaviour=null and contactedHosts=null leave runtime activity and host-reputation coverage unobserved.
- The 5/5 prior safe similarHashes entries use matchKind=filetype only, which is weak similarity rather than exact-content corroboration.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/74 antivirus engines reported a malicious or suspicious result.
- engines.tier1ReportedClean=17 with engines.tier1Malicious=0.
- externalIntel.yaraify.ruleCount=0 and externalIntel.malwareBazaar.hit=false.
- file.mimeType=image/jpeg matches file.fileType=JPEG.
- similarHashes contains 5/5 prior safe file-type matches.
- prevalence.classification=rare_new: the exact hash has only 1 recorded submission from 1 source.
- behaviour=null: no completed runtime observation is available.
- contactedHosts=null: no complete contacted-host reputation result is available.
Use the image normally while keeping endpoint protection enabled. Recheck it if its contents change or the image viewer reports that it is malformed.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 74 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 0 / 74engines flagged
- 1sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
0 of 74 antivirus engines flagged the file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
No completed runtime observation is available for this file.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceRuntime coverageObserved at - 03
The hash has been submitted 1 time from 1 source.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
0 of 74 engines flagged this file
View all 74 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Barely seen in the wild and first surfaced recently. That limits reputation evidence, but rarity alone is not proof of malware.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- wp13469250-devil-may-cry-aesthetic-wallpapers.jpg
- Format
- JPEG
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 120.5 KB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 20, 2026, 9:12 AM UTC
4710a12dbbdba86723311960e2f89622ea359785a12a3a91f5d6ff145bd0efc2Safety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.
- Recovery step 01
View it only when its sender or download source is one you trust.
- Recovery step 02
A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.
- Recovery step 03
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is wp13469250-devil-may-cry-aesthetic-wallpapers.jpg safe?
What is wp13469250-devil-may-cry-aesthetic-wallpapers.jpg?
How many antivirus engines detected wp13469250-devil-may-cry-aesthetic-wallpapers.jpg?
What is the SHA-256 hash of wp13469250-devil-may-cry-aesthetic-wallpapers.jpg?
Is it safe to view wp13469250-devil-may-cry-aesthetic-wallpapers.jpg?
How up to date is this analysis of wp13469250-devil-may-cry-aesthetic-wallpapers.jpg?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.