File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is §d
None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this established ZIP archive, and its 405-source prevalence over roughly two years provides additional reassuring context.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Strong evidence · Widely seen for a long time, and nothing harmful found.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Open it only if you trust the person or website you got it from.
Keep your security software and system updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Antivirus results
0 of 65 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 65
- No result 10
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Not run
- First seen 2y ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
2 points against it and 3 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
It has also circulated through 405 sources across 431 submissions over roughly two years, with no supporting malware-intelligence hits, although no sandbox execution was available.
The archive received no malicious or suspicious detections among 75 engines. Seventeen major antivirus engines, including Microsoft, Kaspersky, ESET, and BitDefender, reported no detection. Its broad, long-standing prevalence—405 sources and 431 submissions over 734 days—further reduces concern about an emerging threat. MalwareBazaar and YARAify supplied no corroborating malware indicators. Because no sandbox run or complete host-reputation check is available, these results support the archive as submitted but do not independently validate every file inside it.
What We Detected
None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this ZIP archive as malicious or suspicious. Seventeen major antivirus engines, including Microsoft, Kaspersky, ESET, and BitDefender, reported no detection, and no malware family was identified.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox observation is available, so the archive's contents were not dynamically executed. There is also no complete contacted-host reputation result; therefore, no claims are made about activity in the test run or network behavior.
What To Do Now
The available static and reputation evidence is reassuring, especially given 405 sources and 431 submissions over roughly two years. Keep security software enabled and scan extracted files before opening or running them, particularly if the download source was unexpected.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- No sandbox run completed, so the archive's contents and runtime effects were not dynamically observed.
- No complete reputation check is available for any hosts the archive's contents might contact.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the archive.
- The file has appeared through 405 sources in 431 submissions over roughly two years.
- No MalwareBazaar or malware-specific YARA corroboration was found.
- The archive was not dynamically executed, leaving its extracted contents and runtime effects unobserved.
- No complete reputation assessment is available for hosts that extracted content might contact.
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
Technical details
None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 15, 2026, 8:23 AM UTC
- SHA-256
4af1ea952ea164c54a06d3d6078fe21960af106d1b7a876b57a9750ddd5c1dc5- SHA-1
8c05b3e4e3405a3ee243634c42b1f151bd71dbe0- MD5
0eccffe5e7b3b78555fea2fc0b3b85c5
About this file
§dFFF §aoverhaul §62.2.1.zip is a ZIP file of 4.4 MB.
- Type and size
- ZIP · 4.4 MB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Oct 11, 2024On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 405 distinct sources
First scanned
Antivirus consensus
0 of 65 engines flagged this file
10 of the 75 engines returned no result for this file (file type not supported, or the scan did not finish), so they did not check it.
- Tier-118 engines0flagged
- Tier-234 engines0flagged
- Low-trust13 engines0flagged
View all 75 engine results
- AcronisClean
- AhnLab-V3Clean
- AlibabaClean
- alibabacloudClean
- ALYacClean
- Antiy-AVLClean
- APEXNo result
- ArcabitClean
- AvastClean
- Avast-MobileClean
- AVGClean
- AviraClean
- BitDefenderClean
- BitDefenderFalxNo result
- BkavClean
- CAT-QuickHealClean
- ClamAVClean
- CMCClean
- CrowdStrikeClean
- CTXClean
- CylanceNo result
- CynetClean
- DeepInstinctNo result
- DrWebClean
- ElasticNo result
- EmsisoftClean
- ESET-NOD32Clean
- F-SecureClean
- FortinetClean
- GDataClean
- GoogleClean
- GridinsoftClean
- huorongClean
- IkarusClean
- JiangminClean
- K7AntiVirusClean
- K7GWClean
- KasperskyClean
- KingsoftClean
- LionicClean
- MalwarebytesClean
- MaxSecureClean
- McAfeeDClean
- MicrosoftClean
- MicroWorld-eScanClean
- NANO-AntivirusClean
- PaloaltoNo result
- PandaClean
- RisingClean
- SangforClean
- SentinelOneClean
- SkyhighClean
- SophosClean
- SUPERAntiSpywareClean
- SymantecClean
- SymantecMobileInsightNo result
- TACHYONClean
- tehtrisNo result
- TencentClean
- TrapmineNo result
- TrellixENSClean
- TrendMicroClean
- TrendMicro-HouseCallClean
- TrustlookNo result
- VaristClean
- VBA32Clean
- VIPREClean
- VirITClean
- ViRobotClean
- WebrootClean
- XcitiumClean
- YandexClean
- ZillyaClean
- ZoneAlarmClean
- ZonerClean
How widely this file has been seen
Widely seen in the wild for a long time. High prior this is legitimate; isolated detections on common-old files are usually false positives.
Chapter 04
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is §dFFF §aoverhaul §62.2.1.zip safe?
What is §dFFF §aoverhaul §62.2.1.zip?
How many antivirus engines detected §dFFF §aoverhaul §62.2.1.zip?
What is the SHA-256 hash of §dFFF §aoverhaul §62.2.1.zip?
Is it safe to open or extract §dFFF §aoverhaul §62.2.1.zip?
How up to date is this analysis of §dFFF §aoverhaul §62.2.1.zip?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.