File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is DJANDYW.
None of the 56 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this old Lightroom-presets ZIP, although limited prevalence and absent the test run leave some residual uncertainty about…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Keep security protection enabled and scan the files after extraction. Open only expected preset or data files, and do not run unexpected executables, scripts, or shortcuts.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Open it only if you trust the person or website you got it from.
Keep your security software and system updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Antivirus results
0 of 56 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 56
- No result 8
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Not run
- First seen 11y ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
None of the 56 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the archive, including the participating major antivirus engines, and available threat-intelligence checks found no corroboration. The ZIP is old but rarely submitted, and no completed observation from the test run is available, so keep protection enabled and inspect extracted files before opening them.
The antivirus evidence contains no detections: none of the 56 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the ZIP, and 16 major antivirus engines reported no detection. Available external checks also produced no malware-family or specific YARA-rule match. Code signing is not meaningful for a ZIP archive, so its unsigned state carries no weight. The archive has existed for more than 11 years but has only four submissions from two sources, making its low prevalence a limitation rather than evidence of harm. No sandbox execution or complete contacted-host reputation result is available, so the assessment rests primarily on static scanning.
What We Detected
None of the 56 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this ZIP archive. Major antivirus engines including Avast, BitDefender, ESET-NOD32, Kaspersky, Microsoft, and Fortinet reported no detection, and external checks supplied no malware-family or malware-specific YARA match.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox observation is available, so there is no observed behavior in the test run to describe. A complete reputation check of contacted hosts is also unavailable. Code-signing evidence is not applicable to this archive format.
What To Do Now
The archive has been known for more than 11 years but has limited prevalence. Keep security software enabled, scan the extracted contents, and avoid running unexpected executables or scripts found inside, especially if the download source is untrusted.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- Only two sources submitted the archive, so its contents have limited prevalence despite being more than 11 years old.
- No completed sandbox run is available, and the archive's contacted-host reputation was not checked or saved.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 56 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the archive.
- Sixteen major antivirus engines reported no detection.
- Available external intelligence checks found no malware-family or malware-specific rule match.
- The archive has been known since January 2015 without a recorded detection.
- The archive is rarely submitted, with only two known sources and four submissions.
- No completed the test run is available to observe extracted content or execution.
- No complete contacted-host reputation result is available.
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
Technical details
None of the 56 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 13, 2026, 7:41 PM UTC
- SHA-256
4edeb21bdb8b2189a90755a6cfcd95ed2e80b8ee4119bc5966c38ca4ce3f6202- SHA-1
a5ad0ffb1dc1b8f05f53354d08506fb272846638- MD5
0f6cc87d88d4b40232dd6d85488baae8
About this file
DJANDYW.COM 4860 Lightroom Presets Master Collection.zip is a ZIP file of 13.1 MB.
- Type and size
- ZIP · 13.1 MB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Jan 21, 2015On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 2 distinct sourcesRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
First scanned
Includes every engine result (64) and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is DJANDYW.COM 4860 Lightroom Presets Master Collection.zip safe?
What is DJANDYW.COM 4860 Lightroom Presets Master Collection.zip?
How many antivirus engines detected DJANDYW.COM 4860 Lightroom Presets Master Collection.zip?
What is the SHA-256 hash of DJANDYW.COM 4860 Lightroom Presets Master Collection.zip?
Is it safe to open or extract DJANDYW.COM 4860 Lightroom Presets Master Collection.zip?
How up to date is this analysis of DJANDYW.COM 4860 Lightroom Presets Master Collection.zip?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.