Is A3_Script_20260921_v04.img safe?
Twelve of 75 engines flag this newly observed ISO, several naming Yogi, but weak tier-1 consensus and absent runtime evidence limit attribution.
The ISO attracted 12 detections among 75 engines, with several products repeatedly naming the Yogi generic-trojan family. It is newly observed and has no established reputation, while no sandbox run or complete contacted-host check is available. Avoid mounting or opening it unless its source and contents can be independently verified.
5652d9c4951cd48408…13554c83b69accRecommended next actions
Before opening
Do not open it until the source can be verified independently.
If you already opened it
Stop using it, scan the device, and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts. Get a fresh copy from the original trusted source and verify its exact hash when possible.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
The ISO attracted 12 detections among 75 engines, with several products repeatedly naming the Yogi generic-trojan family. It is newly observed and has no established reputation, while no sandbox run or complete contacted-host check is available. Avoid mounting or opening it unless its source and contents can be independently verified.
Twelve of 75 engines detected the image, and several labels converge on Yogi rather than presenting only unrelated generic alerts. However, the evidence summary records only one independent tier-1 malicious vote and no strong tier-1 family consensus, while many major engines remained undetected. The file is newly observed, submitted once, and has no signer or similar-file history that could establish provenance. No completed runtime observation is available, and contacted-host reputation was not checked or saved. With no supporting research-rule or known-sample hit, the static detections justify caution but do not conclusively establish the precise family attribution.
What We Detected
12 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the ISO image. BitDefender, Emsisoft, GData, Arcabit, ALYac, MicroWorld-eScan, and VIPRE used Yogi-related labels, while VBA32 reported Sisron. The evidence summary records one independent tier-1 malicious vote and no strong tier-1 family consensus, so repeated labels from related detection technology should not be treated as fully independent agreement.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox observation is available, so execution, persistence, process activity, and network behavior were not observed. The contacted-host reputation cross-check was also not completed or saved. The image contains a PE file, is newly observed, and has only one recorded submission, increasing uncertainty around its provenance.
What To Do Now
Do not mount the image or execute files inside it on a production system. Keep endpoint protection enabled, verify the source through a separate trusted channel, and request a fresh copy from the official distributor if the file was expected. If examination is necessary, use an isolated analysis environment without access to sensitive accounts or data.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- Many major engines, including Microsoft, Kaspersky, ESET-NOD32, Avast, and Fortinet, did not detect the sample.
- externalIntel.malwareBazaar.hit=false and externalIntel.yaraify.ruleCount=0, although absence from those sources does not establish benignity.
- engines.tier1FamilyConsensus.strong=false, so the repeated Yogi labels do not constitute strong independent tier-1 agreement.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- Most engines did not flag the sample
- No strong tier-1 family consensus
- No MalwareBazaar or YARAify hit
- No brand mismatch detected
- 12/75 antivirus detections
- Repeated Yogi generic-trojan labels
- Newly observed with only one submission
- ISO image contains a PE file
- No completed runtime observation
- No complete contacted-host reputation result
Do not mount or execute this ISO until its origin is independently verified. Keep endpoint protection enabled and obtain a replacement through the publisher's official release channel if possible.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete12 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 12 / 75engines flagged
- 1sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
12 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file, including AhnLab-V3 and ALYac.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
The hash has been submitted 1 time from 1 source.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
Category: generic-trojan
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
12 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Barely seen in the wild and first surfaced recently. 12 antivirus detections make that low prevalence materially relevant, but rarity alone is not proof of malware.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- A3_Script_20260921_v04.img
- Format
- ISO image
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 4.2 MB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 21, 2026, 4:50 PM UTC
5652d9c4951cd48408d90f631aba33d6a3cc4b20c15cee6a6113554c83b69accSafety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
We couldn't fully clear this file. Treat it with caution.
- Recovery step 01
Don't open it unless you're certain it came from a source you trust.
- Recovery step 02
Check where you got it — an unexpected attachment or a random download link is a red flag.
- Recovery step 03
If its origin cannot be confirmed, delete this file and use a fresh copy from a trusted source. Get a fresh copy from the original trusted source and verify its exact hash when possible.
- Recovery step 04
If you're still unsure, scan it again in a day or two — detections often catch up on newer files.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is A3_Script_20260921_v04.img safe, or is it malware?
What is A3_Script_20260921_v04.img?
How many antivirus engines detected A3_Script_20260921_v04.img?
I already downloaded and opened A3_Script_20260921_v04.img — what should I do?
How do I remove A3_Script_20260921_v04.img?
What kind of malware is A3_Script_20260921_v04.img?
What is the SHA-256 hash of A3_Script_20260921_v04.img?
How up to date is this analysis of A3_Script_20260921_v04.img?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.