Is men_at_work_contraband-the_best_of_men_at_work.zip safe?
Zero detections on a brand-new 60 MB ZIP with no sandbox or external-intel data.
No engine flagged the file, yet coverage is limited and the sample is only hours old. Similar ZIPs also returned unknown due to low coverage. Without runtime or host-reputation results, the verdict stays unknown.
56a4be6eaa5ce85552…53f692b8c4a54fRecommended next actions
Before opening or extracting
Treat the file as unverified and avoid opening or extracting it until more evidence is available.
If you already opened or extracted it
Run a full device scan. If its origin cannot be confirmed, delete this archive and use a fresh copy from a trusted source.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
No engine flagged the file, yet coverage is limited and the sample is only hours old. Similar ZIPs also returned unknown due to low coverage. Without runtime or host-reputation results, the verdict stays unknown.
All 75 engines returned clean, including 17 tier-1 engines. The file is a newly submitted ZIP with no prior history, and similar ZIPs in the RAG set also received unknown verdicts for the same reason. No sandbox execution, no contacted-host reputation, and no external-intel hits are available. The absence of malicious signals is noted, but the lack of completed analysis prevents a definitive safe classification.
What We Detected
75 antivirus engines scanned the 61 MB ZIP archive; none returned a malicious or suspicious result. 17 tier-1 engines explicitly classified it as clean.
Threat Behavior
No sandbox execution data, no dropped children, and no external-intel matches (CIRCL, MalwareBazaar, YARAify) are present. The file has only been seen once and is less than one day old.
What To Do Now
Re-scan after more engines have had time to analyze it, or submit the archive to a sandbox for dynamic inspection before opening any contained files.
- 0/75 engines flagged malicious
- 17 tier-1 engines reported clean
- rare_new prevalence with only one submission
- no sandbox or contacted-host reputation available
Treat the archive as untrusted until additional dynamic or reputation data becomes available; keep endpoint protection enabled.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 0 / 75engines flagged
- 1sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
No completed runtime observation is available for this file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceDerivedSourceRuntime coverageObserved at - 02
0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file.
ProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 03
The hash has been submitted 1 time from 1 source.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
0 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Barely seen in the wild and first surfaced recently. That limits reputation evidence, but rarity alone is not proof of malware.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- men_at_work_contraband-the_best_of_men_at_work.zip
- Format
- ZIP
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 58.9 MB
- Last analyzed
- Aug 6, 2026, 11:16 AM UTC
56a4be6eaa5ce85552799530f0a0ffd89a3ef349bb084b77d353f692b8c4a54fSafety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
There isn't enough information to give this file a clear rating.
- Recovery step 01
Be cautious — an unknown rating is not the same as a clean bill of health.
- Recovery step 02
Open or extract it only when its sender or download source has been independently verified.
- Recovery step 03
When in doubt, don't open or extract it — or scan it again later once it's more widely seen.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is men_at_work_contraband-the_best_of_men_at_work.zip safe? What is it?
What is men_at_work_contraband-the_best_of_men_at_work.zip?
How many antivirus engines detected men_at_work_contraband-the_best_of_men_at_work.zip?
What is the SHA-256 hash of men_at_work_contraband-the_best_of_men_at_work.zip?
How up to date is this analysis of men_at_work_contraband-the_best_of_men_at_work.zip?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.