File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is SSDBooster.
None of the 72 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this SSD utility after 239 days, and no threat-intelligence or rule hits exist, though its signature failed verification…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
The evidence shows no sign of malware; download it only from the developer's official source and keep your security software enabled.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Run it only if it came from the developer's own website or an official app store.
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
0 of 72 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 72
- No result 4
- Code signing Signer not verified
- Test run Not run
- First seen 8mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
2 points against it and 3 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
None of the 72 antivirus engines that checked it flag this file, including all 18 major antivirus engines, and public malware databases hold no listing for it. Its code signature claims a publisher but failed verification because the certificate expired, so the author cannot be confirmed. No observation from the test run is available.
None of the 72 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, and all 18 major antivirus engines that analysed it reported it clean. The file has been known for about 239 days and still carries no detections. Malware-sharing databases and community rule sets returned no matches, and none of our behaviour rules matched. The signature claims a named individual developer but failed verification because the certificate was outside its validity period, so it neither confirms nor counts against the publisher. No sandbox run is available, so this assessment rests on static and reputation evidence.
What We Detected
None of the 72 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this Windows executable; all 18 major antivirus engines reported it clean. No public malware database or community rule set lists it. The embedded signature claims an individual developer but failed verification because the certificate had expired.
Threat Behavior
No sandbox run is available for this file, so no behaviour in the test run was observed. Our evidence is limited to engine results and reputation data, which show nothing hostile. Files that share its build framework have mixed past results, but that similarity reflects a common toolchain rather than a shared author.
What To Do Now
If you obtained this utility from the developer's official site, it is reasonable to use it. Keep your antivirus enabled, and be wary of any "booster" tool that bundles extra offers or asks for unusual system changes.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- No sandbox run or static analysis of the bytes is available, so behaviour that engines miss would not be visible here.
- The embedded signature failed verification because the certificate expired, so the publisher identity cannot be confirmed.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 72 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, including all 18 major antivirus engines.
- No listing in public malware databases and no matching community malware rules.
- Still undetected roughly eight months after it was first seen.
- The code signature failed verification because the certificate expired, so the publisher cannot be confirmed.
- No sandbox observation of the file's behaviour is available.
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
Technical details
None of the 72 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; a signature that did not verify.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Apr 23, 2026, 10:12 AM UTC
- SHA-256
5780f7ab84a3fbaeee55f484a96a6bc8e81ee81014e087edd2b985f29fdb1f7a- SHA-1
3503c2b4c5d8f85f3a7b22f40d9d6b6dbb43120b- MD5
3397c5ef7ef3c86f3baf7697383109c4
About this file
SSDBooster.exe is a Win32 EXE file of 3.5 MB.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 3.5 MB
- Signer
- Omid Soroori (unverified signature)Worth noting: Malware sometimes copies or steals a company's signature, so this does not mean that company made it.
- First seen
- Feb 26, 2026On VirusTotal.
First scanned Updated
Includes every engine result (76).
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 7 questions people ask most about this file.
Is SSDBooster.exe safe?
What is SSDBooster.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected SSDBooster.exe?
Is SSDBooster.exe digitally signed?
What is the SHA-256 hash of SSDBooster.exe?
Is it safe to run SSDBooster.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of SSDBooster.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.
