File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is Instance Manager. dll safe? Yes, no threats found.
None of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this unsigned file, and the completed sandbox run found no confirmed harmful outcome despite an unverified mapping.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
The evidence supports normal use when the file came with software you intentionally installed from a trusted source. Keep security protection enabled and avoid using it if its origin is unknown or unexpected.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Run it only if it came from the developer's own website or an official app store.
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
0 of 71 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 71
- No result 4
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 1mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 5 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
None of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the sample, including the major antivirus engines, and its single completed sandbox run returned clean. The mapping warrants some caution, but no injected target, malicious child, packed code, malware-specific research rule, or hostile contacted host corroborates it.
The strongest evidence is broad detection silence: none of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file. One completed sandbox run returned clean and produced no dropped files or persistence indicators. It mapped T1055, but no target process was identified, so that mapping supports only possible injection rather than confirmed abuse. All three observed domains received host-reputation coverage, with no malicious or suspicious matches; two were explicitly attributed to sandbox background traffic. The unsigned status and limited prevalence reduce assurance, but the unpacked structure and absence of corroborating threat intelligence support a benign interpretation.
What We Detected
None of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, including all 17 major antivirus engines represented in the results. The executable is unsigned, but its code sections do not show high entropy and no packer was identified.
Threat Behavior
One completed sandbox run returned clean. It mapped possible process injection to MITRE T1055, but no injected target process was recorded, and there were no dropped files or persistence indicators. Reputation checks covered all three observed domains and found no malicious or suspicious matches; two of those domains were identified as analysis-environment background traffic.
What To Do Now
Use the file only if it came from the expected application or installation source. Keep security software enabled, and consider verifying the parent application's origin because the DLL has no digital signature.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- The file is unsigned, so no publisher identity or established certificate history supports it.
- The sandbox mapped process injection, although it did not identify an injected process and returned a clean result.
- One import-table fingerprint-related file previously received a suspicious assessment, but the publisher did not match and the same import-table fingerprint can be shared by unrelated builds.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file.
- The completed sandbox run returned clean and produced no dropped files or persistence indicators.
- All three observed domains were checked, with no malicious or suspicious reputation matches.
- No packer or high-entropy code was found.
- No malware-specific research rules or known malware-feed matches were found.
- The executable has no digital signature, so its publisher cannot be authenticated.
- A sandbox technique mapping indicated possible process injection, although no target process or harmful result was confirmed.
- The file has only moderate distribution history, with eight submitters and ten submissions.
6 sources checked · all complete. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 7sandbox rule tags
- 2spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 1filesystem & mutex artifacts
What this file did when executed
This file was run in a sandbox and its runtime behaviour was observed.
Sandbox verdicts
1- VT: CLEANclean
Techniques observed in the sandbox
7MITRE ATT&CK techniques the sandbox mapped. Highlighted ones are rare in normal software; the others are common in legitimate programs too.
- T1012
- T1027· Obfuscated code
- T1055· Process injection
- T1071· Application protocol
- T1082· System recon
- T1083· Scans your files
- T1129· Loads modules
Observed activity
Processes started
2Programs the file ran, with their command lines.
InstanceManager.exe"C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\InstanceManager.exe"InstanceManager.exe"C:\Users\user\Desktop\InstanceManager.exe"
Mutexes
1Named locks a program uses so only one copy runs; malware families often reuse them.
\Sessions\1\BaseNamedObjects\DBWinMutex
Sandbox background — not the file
3The analysis machine's own processes and connections, recorded in every run.
- VM host
a1672.dscr.akamai.net - VM host
eip-terr-na.cdp1.digicert.com.akahost.net - VM host
nexusrules.officeapps.live.com
Chapter 04
Technical details
None of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · all complete. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 10, 2026, 5:15 AM UTC
- SHA-256
5a3c35e48f9a5bcce3f02c099cce181e7f8f3603bc5c1246c23e6329e7370d54- SHA-1
5922a2b476e8176fc8fa17245a34411e3556e77a- MD5
5580050769fda4add9cc5dffe828c024
About this file
InstanceManager.dll is a Win32 EXE file of 152.6 kB.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 152.6 kB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Sep 27, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 8 distinct sourcesRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 5.69 of 8
First scanned
Antivirus consensus
0 of 71 engines flagged this file
4 of the 75 engines returned no result for this file (file type not supported, or the scan did not finish), so they did not check it.
- Tier-118 engines0flagged
- Tier-236 engines0flagged
- Low-trust17 engines0flagged
View all 75 engine results
- AcronisClean
- AhnLab-V3Clean
- AlibabaClean
- alibabacloudClean
- ALYacClean
- Antiy-AVLClean
- APEXClean
- ArcabitClean
- AvastClean
- Avast-MobileNo result
- AVGClean
- AviraClean
- BitDefenderClean
- BitDefenderFalxNo result
- BkavClean
- CAT-QuickHealClean
- ClamAVClean
- CMCClean
- CrowdStrikeClean
- CTXClean
- CylanceClean
- CynetClean
- DeepInstinctClean
- DrWebClean
- ElasticClean
- EmsisoftClean
- ESET-NOD32Clean
- F-SecureClean
- FortinetClean
- GDataClean
- GoogleClean
- GridinsoftClean
- huorongClean
- IkarusClean
- JiangminClean
- K7AntiVirusClean
- K7GWClean
- KasperskyClean
- KingsoftClean
- LionicClean
- MalwarebytesClean
- MaxSecureClean
- McAfeeDClean
- MicrosoftClean
- MicroWorld-eScanClean
- NANO-AntivirusClean
- PaloaltoClean
- PandaClean
- RisingClean
- SangforClean
- SentinelOneClean
- SkyhighClean
- SophosClean
- SUPERAntiSpywareClean
- SymantecClean
- SymantecMobileInsightNo result
- TACHYONClean
- tehtrisClean
- TencentClean
- TrapmineClean
- TrellixENSClean
- TrendMicroClean
- TrendMicro-HouseCallClean
- TrustlookNo result
- VaristClean
- VBA32Clean
- VIPREClean
- VirITClean
- ViRobotClean
- WebrootClean
- XcitiumClean
- YandexClean
- ZillyaClean
- ZoneAlarmClean
- ZonerClean
Signatures and behavior heuristics
Low-severity pattern matches — worth noting but not on their own cause for alarm.
VirusTotal's sandbox summary maps this run to MITRE T1055 (Process Injection), but no injected process of the sample's own was recorded (the analysis VM's own WMI adapter, crash handlers and Chrome updater are not counted). VirusTotal maps T1055 on about half of all files no engine flags, so the mapping alone is not evidence of injection.
EvidenceT1055 (sandbox MITRE mapping)
Section entropy & packers
No high-entropy executable section or known packer signature was detected. Data and resource sections can still have high entropy without indicating packed code.
How widely this file has been seen
Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.
Chapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is InstanceManager.dll safe?
What is InstanceManager.dll?
How many antivirus engines detected InstanceManager.dll?
What is the SHA-256 hash of InstanceManager.dll?
Is it safe to run InstanceManager.dll?
How up to date is this analysis of InstanceManager.dll?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.