Is 67.7z safe?
No engine detected a threat in this moderately observed 7-Zip archive, though absent runtime analysis leaves its extracted contents unverified.
None of 75 engines flagged the archive, including all 17 tier-1 engines, and no external threat-intelligence match was found. It has also circulated across 15 sources for roughly five months, but the lack of runtime analysis means extracted files should still be scanned before opening.
5ccaf995edba3b4b37…357a506fabd0feRecommended next actions
Before opening or extracting
Open or extract it only when its sender or download source has been independently verified.
If you already opened or extracted it
Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
None of 75 engines flagged the archive, including all 17 tier-1 engines, and no external threat-intelligence match was found. It has also circulated across 15 sources for roughly five months, but the lack of runtime analysis means extracted files should still be scanned before opening.
The archive received no malicious or suspicious detections from 75 engines. All 17 tier-1 engines that contributed results were non-detecting, with no family consensus or confirmed hacktool label. Researcher-curated checks produced no MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, or YARAify match, while 15 independent sources provide some prevalence support. Code signing is not applicable to a 7-Zip archive, so the absence of a signature carries no negative weight. No sandbox execution or complete contacted-host reputation result is available, so the contents cannot be characterized from runtime evidence.
What We Detected
No malicious or suspicious detection appeared among 75 antivirus engines. All 17 contributing tier-1 engines, including BitDefender, ESET-NOD32, Kaspersky, and Microsoft, reported no detection. MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, and YARAify also supplied no corroborating threat match.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox observation is available because behaviour is null. The contacted-host cross-check was also not completed or saved, so no network-reputation conclusion can be drawn. As this is a 7-Zip archive, its embedded files may require separate analysis after extraction.
What To Do Now
Keep endpoint protection enabled and scan the extracted contents before opening or executing them. If the archive came from an unexpected sender or untrusted download, verify its source and avoid launching embedded executables until separately checked.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- behaviour=null, so the archive and any embedded content were not observed executing.
- contactedHosts=null, meaning no complete host-reputation result is available.
- The generic filename file.fileName='67.7z' provides little publisher or purpose context.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/75 engines reported a malicious or suspicious result.
- All 17 tier-1 engines reported no detection.
- No MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, or YARAify hit was present.
- Observed across 15 sources over approximately 146 days.
- No brand mismatch or adversarial-text flag was detected.
- No completed runtime observation is available.
- No complete contacted-host reputation cross-check is available.
- The generic archive name gives little source or purpose context.
- Embedded archive contents were not separately identified in the evidence.
Keep protection enabled and scan every extracted file before opening it. Use additional caution if the archive's source is unexpected or cannot be verified.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 0 / 75engines flagged
- 15sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
No completed runtime observation is available for this file.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceRuntime coverageObserved at - 03
The hash has been submitted 15 times from 15 sources.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
0 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- 67.7z
- Format
- 7ZIP
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 38.1 MB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 17, 2026, 1:59 AM UTC
5ccaf995edba3b4b37117a993da2ea1065e533f74597aef62f357a506fabd0feSafety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.
- Recovery step 01
Open or extract it only when its sender or download source has been independently verified.
- Recovery step 02
A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.
- Recovery step 03
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is 67.7z safe?
What is 67.7z?
How many antivirus engines detected 67.7z?
What is the SHA-256 hash of 67.7z?
Is it safe to open or extract 67.7z?
How up to date is this analysis of 67.7z?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.