File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is Anime
Only 1 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this executable, while higher-confidence engines and the combined sandbox evidence provided no corroborating malicious…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Run it only if it came from the developer's own website or an official app store.
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Antivirus results
1 of 71 flagged
- Flagged 1
- No detection 70
- No result 4
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 5d ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
4 points against it and 5 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
Bkav alone flagged the executable with a generic label; the other 74 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it did not flag it, including all reporting higher-confidence engines. The combined sandbox verdict was clean, and no actual injection target, malicious host, file it created, or malware-specific rule corroborated the detection.
The antivirus result is an isolated generic detection from Bkav, with no support from any higher-confidence engine. The combined sandbox verdict was clean and recorded no named injection target or other high-risk technique. appeared only as an unsupported mapping, so it cannot be treated as observed process injection. The sole listed contact was identified as analysis-environment background traffic, and its reputation check found no malicious or suspicious result. The file is unsigned and was first seen on Nov 2, 2026, which limits assurance, but those facts do not outweigh the strong false-positive pattern.
What We Detected
Bkav was the only engine to flag the executable, using a generic malware label. The remaining 74 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it did not flag it, including every reporting higher-confidence engine. No malware-specific community rule or public sample-database entry supported that detection.
Threat Behavior
The combined sandbox verdict was clean. Although the sandbox summary included T1055, it recorded no process targeted for injection, so this does not establish actual injection. No malicious dropped file or sample-generated network contact was identified; the only listed host was analysis-environment background traffic and was fully covered by the reputation check.
What To Do Now
The isolated detection is most consistent with a false positive. Because the executable is unsigned and lacks a long history, obtain it only from the expected project or author, keep security software enabled, and rescan if the hash or source differs.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- The executable is unsigned and was first seen on Nov 2, 2026, so no verified publisher identity or long history supports it.
- Bkav flagged the file with a generic malware label, although no other engine corroborated that result.
- Our static analysis was not available, so the executable's internal automation logic was not independently examined.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- Only 1 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, and no higher-confidence engine detected it.
- The combined sandbox verdict was clean and recorded no named injection target.
- No malicious dropped file or sample-generated network contact was identified.
- No malware-specific rule or public sample-database listing matched the hash.
- The antivirus analysis found no packer or high-entropy code section.
- The executable is unsigned, so its publisher cannot be authenticated.
- Bkav reports a generic malware detection.
- The file was first seen on Nov 2, 2026 and has only 11 distinct submitters.
- Its internal code was not independently examined by our static analysis.
6 sources checked · all complete. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in 3 isolated tests; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 3isolated sandbox runs
- 15sandbox rule tags
- 2spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 0filesystem & mutex artifacts
Includes the sandbox verdicts, 15 mapped techniques and every process, file, registry and network entry.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
1 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flags it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · all complete. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 1
The saved verdict treats these detections as likely false positives.
- BkavW32.Malware.7919C28B
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Nov 2, 2026, 5:48 AM UTC
- SHA-256
5cda693196567f1b421dee2ad2a987baaacabaccf16db7fd3c01cf60d13000b2- SHA-1
3cc446aa1eeb2d27f73ef728e97c29b383c5d864- MD5
a940b01487c1d2811c18aad9468c5786
About this file
AnimeAdventuresMacro.exe says it is Capy's AA Macro, 2.5 MB.
- Claims to be
- Capy's AA MacroFrom the file's own version information, written by whoever built it.
- Original name
- AnimeAdventuresMacro.exeMatches the shared file name.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 2.5 MB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Nov 2, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 11 distinct sources
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 7.24 of 8
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), 1 matched signature rule, PE section entropy and packers and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is AnimeAdventuresMacro.exe safe?
What is AnimeAdventuresMacro.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected AnimeAdventuresMacro.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of AnimeAdventuresMacro.exe?
Is it safe to run AnimeAdventuresMacro.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of AnimeAdventuresMacro.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.