Is WWL_Ultimate.DE safe?
No antivirus engine detected this XML file, including the reporting tier-one products, and the available static evidence contains no corroborating threat indicators.
None of 75 antivirus engines flagged the XML file, and 16 tier-one engines reported no detection. The available static evidence contains no threat label, heuristic trigger, brand conflict, or intelligence hit, although runtime behavior and complete host-reputation coverage are unavailable.
5e385eb1943d68fd4b…c60acc33b118a9Recommended next actions
Before opening
Open it only when its sender or download source is one you independently trust.
If you already opened it
Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
None of 75 antivirus engines flagged the XML file, and 16 tier-one engines reported no detection. The available static evidence contains no threat label, heuristic trigger, brand conflict, or intelligence hit, although runtime behavior and complete host-reputation coverage are unavailable.
The sample received zero malicious and zero suspicious detections across 75 antivirus engines. Sixteen tier-one engines reported no detection, including BitDefender, ESET-NOD32, Kaspersky, and Microsoft. Code signing is not applicable to this XML file, so its absence carries no negative weight. No heuristic, brand-mismatch, family, or CIRCL threat indicator supports a malware interpretation. However, no sandbox run was completed, and host-reputation plus some external-intelligence checks are unavailable, so the conclusion rests primarily on static scanning.
What We Detected
None of 75 antivirus engines flagged the XML sample as malicious or suspicious. Sixteen tier-one products reported no detection, and there was no family label, fired heuristic, or brand mismatch.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox observation is available, so runtime behavior cannot be characterized. No complete contacted-host reputation result is available, and the MalwareBazaar and YARAify checks were skipped; CIRCL returned no hit.
What To Do Now
The file may be handled normally if it came from an expected source and is intended for trusted software. Keep endpoint protection enabled, and avoid importing it into an application with outdated XML-processing components if its origin is uncertain.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- behaviour=null, so no completed runtime observation is available to confirm how a consuming application might process the XML.
- contactedHosts=null, and MalwareBazaar and YARAify checks were skipped, leaving incomplete reputation and external-intelligence coverage.
- The file was first submitted only 4 days ago and has just 4 submissions, limiting long-term reputation evidence.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/75 engines reported a malicious or suspicious result.
- engines.tier1Malicious=0, with 16 tier-one engines reporting no detection.
- triggeredHeuristics contains no fired rules.
- externalIntel.circl.hit=false.
- brandMismatch is null and no threat family was assigned.
- Only 4 days of submission history are available.
- behaviour=null, so runtime processing was not observed.
- contactedHosts=null, leaving host-reputation coverage unavailable.
- MalwareBazaar and YARAify intelligence checks were skipped.
Use the XML file if it came from a trusted, expected source; otherwise inspect its contents before importing it. Keep endpoint protection and the consuming application fully updated.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
PartialIndependent reference checks were attempted but are incomplete.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 0 / 75engines flagged
- 4sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
One or more independent reference checks were incomplete or unavailable.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceExternal-intelligence coverageObserved at - 03
No completed runtime observation is available for this file.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceRuntime coverageObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
Available reference checks returned no match, but at least one source was unavailable. This is not a clean result.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
0 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- WWL_Ultimate.DE
- Format
- XML
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 885.6 KB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 15, 2026, 9:09 AM UTC
5e385eb1943d68fd4b0a3af77874b59554edf629d024a1056bc60acc33b118a9Safety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.
- Recovery step 01
Open it only when its sender or download source is one you independently trust.
- Recovery step 02
A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.
- Recovery step 03
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is WWL_Ultimate.DE safe?
What is WWL_Ultimate.DE?
How many antivirus engines detected WWL_Ultimate.DE?
What is the SHA-256 hash of WWL_Ultimate.DE?
Is it safe to open WWL_Ultimate.DE?
How up to date is this analysis of WWL_Ultimate.DE?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.