Is ticktick-8-2-1-0.exe-uptodown.com safe?
No antivirus engine detected this signed installer, but one sandbox mapped process-injection and credential-access-like activity that warrants caution and source verification.
All 75 antivirus engines were silent, including 17 tier-1 engines, and the executable carries a valid Appest Inc signature. However, one sandbox mapped process injection, LSASS-targeting activity, persistence, data destruction, and protection impairment, while the signer has no established history in the evidence.
60869c6ec5bc738ba0…c88d62ea657513Recommended next actions
Before running
Do not run it until the source and publisher can be verified independently.
If you already ran it
Stop using it, scan the device, and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts. Get a fresh copy from the developer's official site or an official app store.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
All 75 antivirus engines were silent, including 17 tier-1 engines, and the executable carries a valid Appest Inc signature. However, one sandbox mapped process injection, LSASS-targeting activity, persistence, data destruction, and protection impairment, while the signer has no established history in the evidence.
The strongest reassuring evidence is the 0/75 detection result, including no alerts from 17 tier-1 engines. The executable is validly signed by Appest Inc, but that publisher is neither curated as trusted nor supported by historical sample statistics here. One completed sandbox run mapped activity to T1055, T1485, T1547.001, and T1562.001, and heuristic evidence referenced LSASS access. No malicious sandbox verdict or malicious dropped child corroborates those mappings, so they do not establish a malware family. Prior imphash matches were mostly concerning, but they involve different signers and therefore may reflect a shared installer framework rather than related payloads.
What We Detected
The sample received 0 detections across 75 antivirus engines, with all 17 reporting tier-1 engines returning no alert. Its code signature verifies as Appest Inc, and no claimed-brand conflict was detected. However, the available evidence contains no trusted-publisher match or prior signer history for this certificate.
Threat Behavior
One sandbox run mapped activity to process injection (T1055), data destruction (T1485), startup-folder persistence (T1547.001), and impairment of defenses (T1562.001). Separate heuristics also associated process activity with LSASS, which can resemble credential-dumping behavior. The sandbox did not issue a malicious verdict, and none of 10 inspected child files was identified as malicious, although those child verdicts remain unknown. No complete contacted-host reputation check is available.
What To Do Now
Do not rely on the signature alone. Obtain the installer directly from the application's official release channel and compare its hash or signature details before running it. Keep endpoint protection enabled, and avoid execution if the source or expected publisher cannot be independently confirmed.
Where this verdict could be wrong5 caveats
- The complete 0/75 engine result, including 17 tier-1 non-detections, weighs strongly against known malware.
- behaviour.hasMaliciousSandboxVerdict=false, so the single runtime environment did not independently label execution as malware.
- The file has a verified 'Appest Inc' signature and brandMismatch.detected is absent, but no trusted-publisher or historical signer record corroborates it.
- All 10 inspected dropped children lack malicious verdicts, although their individual status is unknown.
- contactedHosts=null, so no complete host-reputation result is available; the runtime record itself lists no contacted domains, IPs, or URLs.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/75 antivirus engines reported a detection.
- All 17 reporting tier-1 engines returned no detection.
- The Appest Inc code signature is verified.
- behaviour.hasMaliciousSandboxVerdict=false.
- droppedChildren.hasMaliciousChild=false across 10 inspected children.
- One sandbox mapped process-injection activity under T1055.
- Credential-access heuristic referenced activity involving lsass.exe.
- Runtime mappings include T1485, T1547.001, and T1562.001.
- The Appest Inc signer has no historical sample record in signing.signerStats.
- The file was first submitted 0 days ago.
- No complete contacted-host reputation cross-check is available.
Use only a copy obtained from the application's official release channel and verify that its Appest Inc signature and hash match the vendor's release. Keep antivirus and endpoint protection enabled during any further validation.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
Complete1 isolated runtime environment contributed observations.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
Complete2 signature or behavior rules matched.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime flight recorder
Capture complete- 1isolated sandbox run
- 24MITRE ATT&CK techniques
- 15spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 27filesystem & mutex artifacts
What this file does
Observed actions and their security significance
High concern: Injected code into another process, a technique that can conceal execution.
High concern: Changed an auto-start location that can make code run after sign-in or restart.
High concern: Attempted to impair or bypass security controls.
High concern: Manipulated how the operating system loads code, which can redirect execution.
Moderate concern: Contained obfuscated or packed code that makes inspection harder.
Moderate concern: Runs hidden system commands (script or shell).
Moderate concern: Removed execution artefacts or logs, which can conceal activity.
These are observed capabilities from an isolated analysis. A technique does not prove malicious intent on its own, and the file never ran on your device.
Attack story
Runtime observations grouped by analysis stage. Arrows organize the stages; they do not claim chronology or causality.
Input file
The submitted object
- FileObserved
ticktick-8-2-1-0.exe-uptodown.com
60869c6ec5bc738ba0662cbd41bea0e3e1bae3aa44d7b872e7c88d62ea657513
01Uploaded file
Processes
Runtime execution
- ProcessObserved
Observed process
"C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\software.exe"
02Isolated runtime analysis - ProcessObserved
Observed process
"C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\is-RPJMEH42IO.tmp\software.tmp" /SL5="$200EC,22699158,1208320,C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\software.exe"
03Isolated runtime analysis - +1 more recorded observation in Analyst mode
Files
Created or changed
- Written fileObserved
software.tmp
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\is-RPJMEH42IO.tmp\software.tmp
04Isolated runtime analysis - Written fileObserved
2026-09-22_log.txt
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Roaming\Tick_Tick\2026-09-22_log.txt
05Isolated runtime analysis - +1 more recorded observation in Analyst mode
5 recorded facts from one runtime window. Every fact remains independently traceable in Analyst mode.
What this file did when executed
This file was detonated in 1 sandbox and its runtime behaviour was observed.
Adversary techniques mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
- C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\is-RPJMEH42IO.tmp\software.tmp
- C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Roaming\Tick_Tick\2026-09-22_log.txt
- C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Roaming\Tick_Tick\TickTick.db
- C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Roaming\Tick_Tick\TickTick.db-journal
- C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Roaming\Tick_Tick\TickTick.db-wal
- C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Roaming\Tick_Tick\TickTick.db-journal
- C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Packages\Microsoft.XboxGamingOverlay_8wekyb3d8bbwe\LocalCache\KnownGameList.bin
- TickTick
- cversions.3.m
- \Sessions\1\BaseNamedObjects\Local\RstrMgr3887CAB8-533F-4C85-B0DC-3E5639F8D511
- \Sessions\1\BaseNamedObjects\Local\RstrMgr-3887CAB8-533F-4C85-B0DC-3E5639F8D511-Session0000
- \Sessions\1\BaseNamedObjects\Global\C::Users:user:AppData:Local:Microsoft:Windows:Explorer:iconcache_idx.db!rwWriterMutex
Files this sample writes at runtime
This file drops 10 children at runtime. None are currently flagged malicious in our cache.
- c0c5e8d6ac54a9e0b875…cf20cfNever scannednever seen before
- 35f2989ea9aefd72b6eb…a501aaNever scannednever seen before
- e30f8c621af8c2eca342…163cdbNever scannednever seen before
- 9bcae8f98915afe06c12…deb92eNever scannednever seen before
- 8131de75eb57fb452989…5f03c9Never scannednever seen before
- 7c3cd2862f7bbec239b0…fad87bNever scannednever seen before
- ed302203134d5610e8b6…20d357Never scannednever seen before
- 6886c8bbdd5d2084e527…f65a9aNever scannednever seen before
- 2df28a3e02af8cf57fef…4d47f6Never scannednever seen before
- 4c15a459eda7ab864458…dea057Never scannednever seen before
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 2rule hits recorded
- 0 / 75engines flagged
- 4sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
1 high-confidence signature or behavior rule matched this file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceDerivedSourceSignature and behavior rulesObserved at - 02
0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file.
ProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 03
The file has a valid code signature from Appest Inc.
ProvenanceObservedSourceCode-signing metadataObserved at - 04
Scanned file: ticktick-8-2-1-0.exe-uptodown.com — 60869c6ec5bc738ba0662cbd41bea0e3e1bae3aa44d7b872e7c88d62ea657513
ProvenanceObservedSourceUploaded fileObserved at - 05
Observed process — "C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\software.exe"
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 06
Observed process — "C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\is-RPJMEH42IO.tmp\software.tmp" /SL5="$200EC,22699158,1208320,C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\software.exe"
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 07
File written: software.tmp — C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\is-RPJMEH42IO.tmp\software.tmp
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 08
File written: 2026-09-22_log.txt — C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Roaming\Tick_Tick\2026-09-22_log.txt
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
Signatures and behavior heuristics
A community signature or high-severity behavioral heuristic matched. Signatures identify known patterns; heuristics are strong leads but are not proof on their own.
The saved runtime evidence maps this activity to MITRE T1055 (Process Injection). The mapping supports possible process injection, but it does not prove the exact injection method or the operator's intent.
EvidenceC:\Windows\Explorer.EXESandbox observed process activity targeting LSASS (Windows credential store). Legitimate software has no business reading LSASS memory — this is Mimikatz-shape behaviour.
EvidenceC:\Windows\system32\lsass.exe
0 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
Section entropy & packers
No high-entropy executable section or known packer signature was detected. Data and resource sections can still have high entropy without indicating packed code.
How widely this file has been seen
Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- ticktick-8-2-1-0.exe-uptodown.com
- Format
- Win32 EXE
- Code signing
- Signature valid: Appest Inc
- Size
- 22.8 MB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 22, 2026, 5:45 PM UTC
60869c6ec5bc738ba0662cbd41bea0e3e1bae3aa44d7b872e7c88d62ea657513Safety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
We couldn't fully clear this file. Treat it with caution.
- Recovery step 01
Don't run it unless you're certain it came from a source you trust.
- Recovery step 02
Check where you got it — an unexpected attachment or a random download link is a red flag.
- Recovery step 03
If its origin cannot be confirmed, delete this file and use a fresh copy from a trusted source. Get a fresh copy from the developer's official site or an official app store.
- Recovery step 04
If you're still unsure, scan it again in a day or two — detections often catch up on newer files.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is ticktick-8-2-1-0.exe-uptodown.com safe, or is it malware?
What is ticktick-8-2-1-0.exe-uptodown.com?
How many antivirus engines detected ticktick-8-2-1-0.exe-uptodown.com?
What should I do if I already ran ticktick-8-2-1-0.exe-uptodown.com?
How do I remove ticktick-8-2-1-0.exe-uptodown.com?
Is ticktick-8-2-1-0.exe-uptodown.com digitally signed?
What is the SHA-256 hash of ticktick-8-2-1-0.exe-uptodown.com?
How up to date is this analysis of ticktick-8-2-1-0.exe-uptodown.com?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.