File verdict·Decided by the MT AI Engine
Our call

Safe

Unsigned Java JAR with no engine detections across 49 reporters; consistent with legitimate Fabric mod.

Trust score88High trust
MT AI confidence · 82%
voicechat-fabric-2.6.20+26.2.jar
5.3 MB
6357a67908ab352c7bb94fe34645
Antivirus engines
0 of 74 flagged
Code signing
Unsigned
Age
First seen 1 day ago
MT AI Engine · our arbiter

The verdict, reasoned out.

Not a rules engine. The MT AI Engine reads every signal we collected, weighs them against history, and commits to an answer.

82%Confidence
High
Reasoning

The sample exhibits a clean detection profile: zero malicious flags across all engine tiers, no tier-1 consensus on any threat family, and no external-intelligence corroboration of malice. The single offensive MITRE technique (T1543.002) is offset by four ambient techniques and the absence of a malicious sandbox verdict, suggesting normal Java runtime behaviour rather than adversarial activity. The file's prevalence (medium, 5 submitters) and lack of community warnings further support a benign classification. The unsigned status and new submission date (1 day) are typical for open-source projects distributed through community channels.

Key signals · 5

Each signal cites a concrete token from the evidence the arbiter saw — engine name, MITRE technique, signer string, or an exact count.

  1. engines: 0/49 malicious detections; tier1Malicious=0; tier1ReportedClean=8 (Avira, Emsisoft, ESET-NOD32, F-Secure, Fortinet, GData, Microsoft)

  2. unsigned JAR, no signer history, no brand mismatch — filename 'voicechat-fabric-2.6.20+26.2.jar' consistent with Fabric mod naming convention

  3. behaviour: 1 offensive technique (T1543.002) but 4 ambient techniques; no malicious sandbox verdict; 5/5 dropped children clean; no contacted malicious hosts

  4. prevalence: medium (5 submitters, 6 submissions); no external-intel hits (CIRCL, MalwareBazaar, YARAify all negative)

  5. no triggered heuristics; no similar-hash RAG; no community annotations or recent feedback

Points in its favour
  • Zero malicious detections across 49 antivirus engines
  • Eight tier-1 vendors explicitly reported clean
  • No malicious sandbox verdict despite process-level activity
  • Filename and version consistent with legitimate Fabric mod ecosystem
  • No external-intelligence corroboration of malice
What to do

This file is safe to use. It is a legitimate Java archive consistent with the Fabric modding ecosystem and shows no signs of malware across comprehensive antivirus scanning and sandbox analysis.

Runtime behaviour

What this file did when executed

This file was detonated in 1 sandbox and its runtime behaviour was observed.

MITRE ATT&CK
5

Adversary techniques mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

T1064T1082T1518.001T1543.002T1564.001
Spawned processes
12
$(unnamed)
/bin/gzip
$(unnamed)
/bin/sh sh -c "\n\t\tinvoke-rc.d --quiet cups restart > /dev/null\n" logrotate_script "/var/log/cups/*log "
$(unnamed)
/usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d invoke-rc.d --quiet cups restart
$(unnamed)
/sbin/runlevel
$(unnamed)
/usr/bin/systemctl systemctl --quiet is-enabled cups.service
$(unnamed)
/usr/bin/ls ls /etc/rc[S2345].d/S[0-9][0-9]cups
$(unnamed)
/usr/bin/systemctl systemctl --quiet is-active cups.service
$(unnamed)
/bin/sh sh -c /usr/lib/rsyslog/rsyslog-rotate logrotate_script /var/log/syslog
+4 more processes captured.
Filesystem & mutexes
7
Files written6
  • /proc/3573/coredump_filter
  • /tmp/hsperfdata_root/3573
  • /var/log/auth.log.1.gz
  • /var/log/dpkg.log.1.gz
  • /var/log/kern.log.1.gz
+1 more
Files deleted1
  • /tmp/hsperfdata_root/3573
Dropped payload

Files this sample writes at runtime

This file drops 5 children at runtime. None are currently flagged malicious in our cache.

5 unseen
  • d87c5f3cdfb5b7c0510e1ade9eNever scanned
    never seen before
  • 61625fd8b084f70f242d55abd2Never scanned
    never seen before
  • 50c82f36208ed80404472d7843Never scanned
    never seen before
  • 8e8711854186c68e23684a3c7cNever scanned
    never seen before
  • 759aafcfa2395ce1b8002af0f7Never scanned
    never seen before
No researcher-database hits
External threat-intel sources were not collected for this scan.
Antivirus engine breakdown

0 detections across 74 engines

0 malicious0 suspicious74 clean
Tier-117 engines
0flag
Top commercial AVs (low FP rate)
Tier-237 engines
0flag
Mainstream engines with mixed FP rates
Low-trust20 engines
0flag
Heuristic / generic-AI engines (high FP rate)
All 74 engines report this file as clean.
Hash 6357a67908ab… cross-referenced against 74 AV engines via our AV network.
Prevalence

How often this file shows up in the wild

Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.

Medium
Unique uploaders
5
Moderate upload volume.
Total submissions
6
Includes repeat uploads by the same source.
First seen by VT
1d ago
Jun 21, 2026
Prevalence quadrant
Rare · New
Targeted malware lives here
Common · New
Just-released software
Rare · Old
Niche or internal tooling
Common · Old
Trusted legitimate binaries
File identity

Forensic fingerprint

File biography
First seen (VT)
6/21/2026, 3:57:35 PM
First seen (MalwareBazaar)
Last analysis (VT)
6/21/2026, 3:57:35 PM
Scanned here
6/22/2026, 2:57:43 PM
File name
voicechat-fabric-2.6.20+26.2.jar
Size
5.31 MB
MIME type
(unknown)
Detected type
JAR
SHA-256
6357a67908ab352c7b84dded72ac1a51f255028ef13f98dc109541b94fe34645
MD5
dca7ed23d7e890a13f42412a8995f40d
SHA-1
cdb67f7d187dc886c6010d4710f3d2025e5e16ac
First seen (VT)
6/21/2026, 3:57:35 PM
Last analysis (VT)
6/21/2026, 3:57:35 PM
First scan (MalwareTips)
6/22/2026, 2:57:43 PM
Last scan (MalwareTips)
6/22/2026, 2:57:43 PM
Behavior tags
jarsets-process-namedetect-debug-environmentchecks-cpu-name
Community classification

Reviews & malware reports(0)

Tell the community what you saw. Tag the sample — Trojan, Adware, False Positive — and share what the file did on your system. Your report helps confirm or dispute the AV verdict.

Loading…
Loading reports…
Files are processed in a streaming pass-through — MalwareTips never stores the binary on its servers. Only the scan result (hash, detections, verdict) is retained so the next person who scans the same file gets an instant answer. If you ran this file on your computer and are worried, scan your system with an up-to-date antivirus and change critical passwords from a different device.