Is IMG_6104.png safe?
No engine among 75 flagged this PNG, including 15 tier-1 products, and no threat family or corroborating malicious intelligence was identified.
The PNG received no malicious or suspicious detections from 75 engines, with 15 tier-1 products reporting no detection. It is newly observed and lacks runtime analysis, but the available static evidence contains no concrete threat indicator.
644d4e3bb4b52aa6d8…3c0ffa993d8e7cRecommended next actions
Before viewing
View it only when its sender or download source is one you trust.
If you already viewed it
Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
The PNG received no malicious or suspicious detections from 75 engines, with 15 tier-1 products reporting no detection. It is newly observed and lacks runtime analysis, but the available static evidence contains no concrete threat indicator.
All 75 antivirus engines returned without a malicious or suspicious classification, and none of the independent tier-1 engines detected a threat. The reported PNG type and image/png MIME type are consistent, while code signing is not applicable to this format. No named malware family, malicious child, brand conflict, or corroborating external threat hit appears in the evidence. Five prior PNG assessments also received clean outcomes, although file-type-only similarity is weak supporting context. The file is newly observed, and no completed runtime or contacted-host assessment is available, so the conclusion is based primarily on broad static scanning.
What We Detected
No malicious or suspicious result appeared among 75 antivirus engines. Fifteen tier-1 engines reported no detection, including BitDefender, Kaspersky, ESET-NOD32, Microsoft, and Fortinet. The file is identified consistently as a PNG image with the image/png MIME type, and no malware family was assigned.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox run is available, so runtime behavior was not observed. Contacted-host reputation was also not checked or saved, and YARAify coverage timed out. The available static evidence contains no malicious child, brand mismatch, suspicious heuristic trigger, or external malicious-intelligence hit.
What To Do Now
The image can be handled normally while keeping endpoint protection enabled. Because it is newly observed, obtain it from a trusted sender and rescan if its contents, extension, or behavior appear inconsistent with an ordinary image.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- prevalence.classification=rare_new with 1 submitter and 1 submission, so the file has almost no established history.
- behaviour=null and contactedHosts=null leave runtime behavior and contacted-host reputation unassessed.
- externalIntel.availability.yaraify=error, leaving a gap in rule-based external coverage.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/75 engines reported malicious or suspicious results
- engines.tier1Malicious=0
- 15 tier-1 engines reported no detection
- PNG file type matches image/png MIME type
- 5/5 similar PNG assessments received safe verdicts
- Observed for the first time with only 1 submission
- No completed runtime analysis
- No completed contacted-host reputation assessment
- YARAify rule coverage unavailable due to timeout
Handle the file as an ordinary image, but keep endpoint protection enabled. If it came from an unexpected source, verify the sender and rescan after threat definitions update.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
PartialIndependent reference checks were attempted but are incomplete.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 0 / 75engines flagged
- 1sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
One or more independent reference checks were incomplete or unavailable.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceExternal-intelligence coverageObserved at - 03
No completed runtime observation is available for this file.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceRuntime coverageObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
Available reference checks returned no match, but at least one source was unavailable. This is not a clean result.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
0 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Barely seen in the wild and first surfaced recently. That limits reputation evidence, but rarity alone is not proof of malware.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- IMG_6104.png
- Format
- PNG
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 895.3 KB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 28, 2026, 10:08 AM UTC
644d4e3bb4b52aa6d8a5e688247e998e7e6f808d5fb3aa69833c0ffa993d8e7cSafety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.
- Recovery step 01
View it only when its sender or download source is one you trust.
- Recovery step 02
A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.
- Recovery step 03
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is IMG_6104.png safe?
What is IMG_6104.png?
How many antivirus engines detected IMG_6104.png?
What is the SHA-256 hash of IMG_6104.png?
Is it safe to view IMG_6104.png?
How up to date is this analysis of IMG_6104.png?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.