File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is scrcpy. exe safe? Yes, no threats found.
None of the 68 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this executable, and its sole sandbox run returned clean, although an unconfirmed mapping warrants routine caution.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Run it only if it came from the developer's own website or an official app store.
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
0 of 68 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 68
- No result 7
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 18d ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
4 points against it and 5 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
None of the 68 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable, including all 17 major antivirus engines represented in the evidence. One completed sandbox run returned clean; its mapping lacked an identified injection target, while the unsigned status and recent first submission justify obtaining the file from a trusted source.
The antivirus result is uniformly favorable: none of the 68 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, and there is no named threat family. The completed sandbox run returned clean and showed no malicious files it created or persistence indicators. It did map T1055, but no injected process or target was identified, so that mapping alone is insufficient to establish hostile process injection. Static PE analysis found neither packing nor high-entropy code. Confidence is moderated because the executable is unsigned, recently observed, and no complete contacted-host reputation check is available.
What We Detected
None of the 68 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable, including the 17 major antivirus engines represented in the evidence. No malware family, hacking tool label, external-intelligence hit, packing indicator, or high-entropy code was reported.
Threat Behavior
One completed sandbox run returned clean. It mapped activity to MITRE T1055, which can relate to process injection, but no injected process or target was identified; no persistence indicators, malicious files it created, or sample-attributed network contacts were recorded. A complete host-reputation cross-check was not available.
What To Do Now
Obtain the executable from the project's official distribution channel and verify its published checksum when possible. Keep security software enabled, especially because this copy is unsigned and was first observed on Oct 8, 2026.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- The executable is unsigned, so there is no verified publisher identity.
- The sandbox mapped T1055, which can indicate process injection, but no injected process or target was identified.
- The sample was first submitted on Oct 8, 2026, limiting the value of its current detection history.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 68 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable.
- All 17 major antivirus engines represented in the evidence returned no detection.
- The completed sandbox run returned clean and recorded no persistence indicators.
- Static PE analysis found no packer and no high-entropy executable code.
- No malicious file it created or external-intelligence match was found.
- The executable has no verified digital signature or established publisher history.
- The sample was first observed on Oct 8, 2026, so its reputation history is limited.
- A runtime mapping referenced possible process injection, although it did not identify an injected process or target.
- No complete reputation check was available for contacted hosts.
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 11sandbox rule tags
- 3spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 1filesystem & mutex artifacts
Includes the sandbox verdicts, 11 mapped techniques and every process, file, registry and network entry.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
None of the 68 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 10, 2026, 12:58 AM UTC
- SHA-256
64bcee493d9243dab1e84093928014348738e31f3225e67558210e6b6cfb9cd6- SHA-1
7adc3ddacc125713484971ceaa98da77f7fab644- MD5
182e3f2ad0d50111a2af8b6991da2b8f
About this file
scrcpy.exe is a Win32 EXE file of 766.7 kB.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 766.7 kB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Oct 8, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 26 distinct sources
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 5.97 of 8
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), 1 matched signature rule, PE section entropy and packers and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is scrcpy.exe safe?
What is scrcpy.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected scrcpy.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of scrcpy.exe?
Is it safe to run scrcpy.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of scrcpy.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.