File scan report
Verdict Suspicious
Is electron. exe safe? Treat it as suspicious.
No antivirus engine detected the verified WeMod-signed executable, but one sandbox’s malicious result and unconfirmed mapping warrant caution.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Why Suspicious? A sandbox test run rated it as risky; nothing else confirms it.
Limited evidence · One sign points to a problem; nothing else confirms it.
If it came from a link, an attachment or a stranger, delete it.
What to do now4 steps
Some signs point to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful. Treat it with caution.
What to do
Don't run it unless you're sure where it came from.
Check where you got it: an unexpected attachment, a link someone sent you or a re-upload is a red flag.
If you can't confirm where it came from, delete it. If you need the program, download it again from the publisher's own website.
If you already ran it
Stop using it, run a full scan with your antivirus and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts.
Not sure what to do?
Ask the MalwareTips community before you run it. If you already ran it, follow the cleanup guide.
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
0 of 66 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 66
- No result 9
- Code signing WeMod LLC
- Test run Completed
- First seen 17d ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 5 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
None of the 66 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, and its WeMod LLC signature verifies correctly. However, one sandbox assigned a malicious result and mapped possible process injection, although it identified neither an injection target nor a method, leaving materially conflicting evidence.
The strongest favorable evidence is that none of the 66 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable, including no major detections. Its signature verifies as WeMod LLC, and one earlier signer-matched file also received a favorable assessment, although that history is too small to establish the publisher automatically. The completed sandbox returned a malicious result and mapped T1055, but it recorded no injected target process and supplied no method-specific evidence. No sample network contacts or persistence indicators were observed, while a complete contacted-host reputation result is unavailable. With no family labels, malware-specific YARA rules, known malicious child, or packing evidence, the isolated runtime result is insufficiently corroborated but still warrants caution.
What We Detected
None of the 66 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable, and no engine supplied a malware-family label. The code signature verifies as WeMod LLC. One prior signer-matched sample also received a favorable assessment, but the available signer history contains only one sample and is therefore limited.
Threat Behavior
One completed sandbox assigned a malicious result and mapped T1055, which can indicate process injection. However, the run did not identify an injected process or establish the injection method. It observed no sample network contacts or persistence indicators. Two dropped files have no saved verdicts, so they remain unresolved and are not treated as evidence of harm. No complete contacted-host reputation cross-check is available.
What To Do Now
Keep security software enabled and obtain the file from WeMod's official distribution channel. If its origin or signature details differ from the expected release, quarantine it and avoid execution pending further analysis.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- A completed sandbox assigned a malicious result and mapped possible process injection, so the runtime finding cannot be dismissed solely because antivirus engines were silent.
- The verified WeMod LLC signature is favorable, but the publisher history contains only one prior sample and has not reached automatic-trust thresholds.
- The two dropped files lack saved verdicts, leaving their nature unresolved rather than established as benign.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 66 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable.
- The code signature verifies as WeMod LLC.
- A previous signer-matched sample received a favorable assessment.
- No sample network contacts or persistence indicators were observed in the completed run.
- No malware-specific research rules, known malicious child, or packing indicators were found.
- One completed sandbox assigned a malicious result.
- The test run mapped possible process injection, although it did not identify a target or technique.
- The file was first observed on Oct 8, 2026 and has limited submission history.
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; 1 test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 11sandbox rule tags
- 2spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 18filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Checked whether it was running on a test computer.
Note: Read basic details of the test computer, such as its Windows version.
Note: Looked through folders on the test computer (most installers do this).
Note: Checked which security software was installed on the test computer.
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as code injection, but no injected program was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as contacting a server, but no contacted host was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as changing how Windows loads code; nothing confirms it.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 5: FileSeen in the test run
electron.exe
6a451e8c160a419c95ce3651464502b7d00050956d64e4c11b96cdea4aa0eba3
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
Wand.exe
"C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\Wand.exe"
Test run - Evidence 3 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
Wand.exe
"C:\Users\user\Desktop\Wand.exe"
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Files
Created or changed
- Evidence 4 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
Temp
C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp
Test run - Evidence 5 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
9e659fe8-7377-4aa9-b068-077650274dcc
C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp\9e659fe8-7377-4aa9-b068-077650274dcc
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
5 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
Includes the sandbox verdicts, 11 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 2 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
None of the 66 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; signed by WeMod LLC.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 9, 2026, 11:22 PM UTC
- SHA-256
6a451e8c160a419c95ce3651464502b7d00050956d64e4c11b96cdea4aa0eba3- SHA-1
9535f1b56a0d399c9a5d4255f9379c988118d069- MD5
ac6900241b49fefbc9fd71b990092262
About this file
electron.exe is a Win32 EXE file of 686.4 kB.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 686.4 kB
- Signer
- WeMod LLCValid code signature.
- First seen
- Oct 8, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 4 distinct sourcesRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 6.52 of 8
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), 1 matched signature rule, PE section entropy and packers and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 7 questions people ask most about this file.
Is electron.exe safe, or is it malware?
What is electron.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected electron.exe?
I already downloaded and ran electron.exe — what should I do?
Is electron.exe digitally signed?
What is the SHA-256 hash of electron.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of electron.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.