Is IMG_6133.png safe?
No engine among 75 detected a threat in this PNG, including 17 tier-1 products, and available external intelligence found no known-malware match.
All 75 antivirus engines returned no malicious or suspicious detection, with 17 tier-1 products among those reporting no detection. The exact hash is newly observed and lacks runtime analysis, but there is no positive threat evidence in the available static or external-intelligence results.
6bf26405dca24f9b5e…75930744b15eb2Recommended next actions
Before viewing
View it only when its sender or download source is one you trust.
If you already viewed it
Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
All 75 antivirus engines returned no malicious or suspicious detection, with 17 tier-1 products among those reporting no detection. The exact hash is newly observed and lacks runtime analysis, but there is no positive threat evidence in the available static or external-intelligence results.
The sample is identified as a PNG image, for which code-signing evidence is not applicable. None of 75 engines flagged it, and 17 tier-1 products reported no detection. Available MalwareBazaar and CIRCL checks produced no hit, although the YARAify request timed out. No sandbox run was completed, and no complete contacted-host reputation result is available. The file is newly observed, but rarity alone does not outweigh the unanimous antivirus result and absence of corroborating threat indicators.
What We Detected
The file is a 1,674,696-byte PNG image. None of 75 antivirus engines reported it as malicious or suspicious, and 17 tier-1 engines—including BitDefender, Kaspersky, Microsoft, ESET-NOD32, and Fortinet—reported no detection. Available MalwareBazaar and CIRCL checks also found no match.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox observation is available, so runtime behavior cannot be characterized. The contacted-host reputation check was not completed or saved, and the YARAify request timed out; these are coverage limitations rather than evidence of harmful activity.
What To Do Now
The available evidence supports treating this as an ordinary image. Because the exact hash is newly observed, keep endpoint protection enabled and avoid opening it in outdated image software if it came from an unexpected or untrusted sender.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- prevalence.classification=rare_new with 1 submitter and 1 submission, so the exact hash has almost no established history.
- behaviour=null, contactedHosts=null, and externalIntel.availability.yaraify=error leave runtime, host-reputation, and YARA coverage incomplete.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/75 engines reported a malicious or suspicious detection.
- 17 tier-1 engines reported no detection.
- MalwareBazaar and CIRCL returned no match.
- 5/5 file-type-only similar samples received prior safe verdicts.
- No triggeredHeuristics entries or brand mismatch were present.
- Exact hash is newly observed, with 1 submitter and 1 submission.
- No completed sandbox runtime observation is available.
- No complete contacted-host reputation result is available.
- YARAify coverage was unavailable due to a timeout.
No special remediation is indicated by the available evidence. Keep endpoint protection enabled and use a current image viewer, especially if the file arrived unexpectedly.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
PartialIndependent reference checks were attempted but are incomplete.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 0 / 75engines flagged
- 1sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
One or more independent reference checks were incomplete or unavailable.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceExternal-intelligence coverageObserved at - 03
No completed runtime observation is available for this file.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceRuntime coverageObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
Available reference checks returned no match, but at least one source was unavailable. This is not a clean result.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
0 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Barely seen in the wild and first surfaced recently. That limits reputation evidence, but rarity alone is not proof of malware.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- IMG_6133.png
- Format
- PNG
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 1.6 MB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 28, 2026, 11:04 AM UTC
6bf26405dca24f9b5e013fa4e8cadbea76b51f60549314b36575930744b15eb2Safety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.
- Recovery step 01
View it only when its sender or download source is one you trust.
- Recovery step 02
A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.
- Recovery step 03
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is IMG_6133.png safe?
What is IMG_6133.png?
How many antivirus engines detected IMG_6133.png?
What is the SHA-256 hash of IMG_6133.png?
Is it safe to view IMG_6133.png?
How up to date is this analysis of IMG_6133.png?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.