File scan report
Verdict Suspicious
Is TFGX_
Six of the 63 antivirus engines that checked it detected the archive, but none of the 17 major antivirus engines did, and the family labels conflict.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Why Suspicious? 6 antivirus engines flag it, but no major engine agrees; nothing else confirms it.
Limited evidence · One sign points to a problem; nothing else confirms it.
If it came from a link, an attachment or a stranger, delete it.
What to do now4 steps
Some signs point to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful. Treat it with caution.
What to do
Don't open or extract it unless you're sure where it came from.
Check where you got it: an unexpected attachment, a link someone sent you or a re-upload is a red flag.
If you can't confirm where it came from, delete it. If you need the program, download it again from the publisher's own website.
If you already opened or extracted it
Stop using it, run a full scan with your antivirus and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts.
Not sure what to do?
Ask the MalwareTips community before you run it. If you already ran it, follow the cleanup guide.
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
6 of 63 flagged
- Flagged 6
- No detection 57
- No result 11
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Completed
- First seen 1mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
4 points against it and 3 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
One sandbox mapped T1055, and T1562.001, yet it supplied neither an explicit malicious verdict nor a named injection target, leaving significant but inconclusive risk.
The antivirus evidence is mixed: six independent engines flagged the archive, but no major antivirus engines detected it and no family consensus formed. The detections include Ravartar, Kryptik and Small.CK labels, with several generic rule-based results, so they do not establish one reliable family. The test run mapped possible process injection, privilege elevation and security-control impairment, which are concerning when considered together. However, no target process was identified, no persistence was observed and the sandbox issued no explicit malicious verdict. The archive's ten extracted children lack saved verdicts, while host-reputation coverage was not available, so those areas cannot be treated as clean. Overall, the evidence warrants caution but falls short of confirmed malware attribution.
What We Detected
Six of the 63 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the RAR archive. Labels varied among Ravartar, Kryptik, Small.CK and generic malware rules, so there is no dependable family consensus.
Threat Behavior
The completed sandbox run mapped T1055, T1548 and T1562.001, corresponding to possible process injection, privilege elevation and security-control impairment. These mappings are concerning, but no injected process target was recorded and the sandbox did not issue an explicit malicious verdict. The sample launched several bundled conversion and editing utilities from a temporary directory. Ten extracted files were observed, but none has a saved classification, and no complete host-reputation result is available.
What To Do Now
Do not extract or run the archive on a production system until its source and the bundled executables are verified. Keep security software enabled, and use an isolated disposable environment if further examination is necessary.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- All 17 reporting major antivirus engines were silent, including BitDefender, ESET-NOD32, Kaspersky and Fortinet.
- The sandbox produced no explicit malicious verdict, identified no injected target process and observed no persistence indicators.
- No researcher-curated family rule or known malware-repository match corroborated the generic antivirus labels.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- The sandbox issued no explicit malicious verdict and recorded no persistence indicators.
- No contacted domains, IP addresses or URLs were observed during the completed sandbox run.
- Researcher-curated rules and the checked malware repository supplied no corroborating hit.
- Six antivirus engines detected the archive, including two mid-tier products.
- The test run mapped possible process injection, privilege elevation and security-control impairment.
- The archive is rare, with only two known submitters and three submissions.
- The antivirus labels include several trojan names, although they do not agree on one family.
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 16sandbox rule tags
- 15spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 16filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Contains packed or scrambled code that is harder to inspect (common in installers too).
Moderate concern: Ran commands or a script on the test computer.
Moderate concern: Checked whether it was running on a test computer.
Note: Read the user name of the test computer.
Note: Listed the programs running on the test computer.
Note: Read basic details of the test computer, such as its Windows version.
Note: Looked through folders on the test computer (most installers do this).
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as code injection, but no injected program was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as contacting a server, but no contacted host was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as weakening security settings; no setting change was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as changing how Windows loads code; nothing confirms it.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 5: FileSeen in the test run
TFGX_Card_Editor_v2.5.rar
7022a2bb0073916ef7d7262fedf3cbd85a55ed05e651d4dac8f556b1ceb81786
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
cmd.exe
"C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe" /c "cd ^"C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp^" && start /wait ^"^" ^"C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\TFGX_Card_Editorv2.5/TFGX_Card_Editor/GimConverter/gim2png/gim2png.bat^"
Test run - Evidence 3 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
cmd.exe
C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe /K "C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\TFGX_Card_Editorv2.5/TFGX_Card_Editor/GimConverter/gim2png/gim2png.bat
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Files
Created or changed
- Evidence 4 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
Temp
C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp
Test run - Evidence 5 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
c00dd873-c1fe-474b-b360-8e52220678ed
C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp\c00dd873-c1fe-474b-b360-8e52220678ed
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
5 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
Includes 16 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 10 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
6 of the 63 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 6
- BkavW32.Malware.3CE210A
- MalwarebytesMalware.Heuristic.2026
- MaxSecureTrojan.Malware.300983.susgen
- RisingTrojan.Kryptik@AI.80 (RDML:+S7HAuceYjiwnsKWwoi+QQ)
- VBA32BScope.Trojan.Ravartar
- VirITTrojan.Win32.Small.CK
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 9, 2026, 1:59 PM UTC
- SHA-256
7022a2bb0073916ef7d7262fedf3cbd85a55ed05e651d4dac8f556b1ceb81786- SHA-1
70055edd74b04a0f6b92ec8546b036a648cd5898- MD5
edd95854972326fa0153a57121adf4a1
About this file
TFGX_Card_Editor_v2.5.rar is an RAR file of 2.6 MB.
- Type and size
- RAR · 2.6 MB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Sep 16, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 2 distinct sourcesRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
First scanned
Includes every engine result (74), 1 matched signature rule and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is TFGX_Card_Editor_v2.5.rar safe, or is it malware?
What is TFGX_Card_Editor_v2.5.rar?
How many antivirus engines detected TFGX_Card_Editor_v2.5.rar?
What should I do if I already opened or extracted TFGX_Card_Editor_v2.5.rar?
What is the SHA-256 hash of TFGX_Card_Editor_v2.5.rar?
How up to date is this analysis of TFGX_Card_Editor_v2.5.rar?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.