File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is Monster
None of the 55 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable, while completed runtime and static checks found no corroborated malware activity, packing, persistence…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Run it only if it came from the developer's own website or an official app store.
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Antivirus results
0 of 55 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 55
- No result 20
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 5y ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 5 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
None of the 55 antivirus engines that checked it detected the executable, and the completed sandbox run returned clean without high-risk techniques, persistence, or dropped files. The unsigned status and injection-related runtime mapping warrant ordinary caution, but they lack corroboration from detections, hostile hosts, or malware-specific research rules.
None of the 55 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the sample, including the contributing major antivirus engines. One completed sandbox run returned clean and recorded no high-risk techniques, persistence indicators, written files, or files it created. All ten distinct observed hosts received complete reputation coverage, with none identified as malicious or suspicious; the Microsoft domain and private address were sandbox background contacts rather than sample evidence. Static PE analysis found neither high-entropy code nor a recognized packer, and malware-specific external research produced no matches. The file is unsigned and the sandbox recorded an injection-related mapping, but those concerns are not corroborated by detections or hostile infrastructure. A suspicious prior file shares only the import-table fingerprint without signer corroboration, making that similarity weak evidence.
What We Detected
None of the 55 antivirus engines that checked it flagged MonsterCamp.exe. The antivirus analysis found no recognized packer, no high-entropy code, no brand mismatch, and no malware-specific external research matches.
Threat Behavior
One completed sandbox run returned clean. It recorded three broadly applicable techniques, including T1574.002 and injection into an updater process, but no high-risk techniques, persistence indicators, written files, or files it created. Reputation coverage included all ten distinct observed hosts and found none malicious or suspicious; the Microsoft domain and private address were identified as sandbox background traffic.
What To Do Now
The evidence does not substantiate malware activity. Because the executable is unsigned, obtain it from a trusted source, verify its SHA-256 as 70e6a7e778c2d33b67be78b8c57ea3067c13229e7f1d1377eb509e54e8001d27, and keep security software enabled when running it.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- The executable is unsigned, so publisher identity and certificate history cannot provide additional assurance.
- The sandbox mapped and recorded injection into an updater process, although it found no high-risk techniques and returned a clean result.
- One unrelated file sharing this import-table fingerprint previously received a suspicious assessment, but the match lacks signer corroboration and may reflect a common build framework.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 55 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file.
- The completed sandbox run returned clean and found no high-risk techniques, persistence, or files it created.
- Complete reputation coverage of the ten observed hosts found no malicious or suspicious infrastructure.
- The antivirus analysis found no recognized packing or high-entropy code.
- No malware-specific external research rules matched the sample.
- The executable has no digital signature, so its publisher cannot be authenticated.
- The sandbox mapped an injection-related technique and recorded interaction with an updater process, although no malicious follow-on activity was observed.
- A different unsigned executable sharing the same import-table fingerprint previously received a suspicious assessment, but this may be a build-framework collision.
6 sources checked · all complete. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 3sandbox rule tags
- 1spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 15filesystem & mutex artifacts
Includes the sandbox verdicts, 3 mapped techniques and every process, file, registry and network entry.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
None of the 55 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · all complete. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 14, 2026, 7:26 PM UTC
- SHA-256
70e6a7e778c2d33b67be78b8c57ea3067c13229e7f1d1377eb509e54e8001d27- SHA-1
dfca6a48fac70aef7e8a6e81f313fd258166e63f- MD5
264f9431b170c57353e23529521fbd3a
About this file
MonsterCamp.exe is a Win32 EXE file of 640.0 kB.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 640.0 kB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Dec 22, 2020On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 74 distinct sources
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 4.00 of 8
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), PE section entropy and packers and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is MonsterCamp.exe safe?
What is MonsterCamp.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected MonsterCamp.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of MonsterCamp.exe?
Is it safe to run MonsterCamp.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of MonsterCamp.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.