File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is this image safe? Yes, no threats found.
This JPEG image drew no detections from any of the 75 engines, and no rule or threat-intelligence rule matched it.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
This image can be opened normally in an up-to-date viewer. Keep your security software enabled and patched as usual.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Open it only if you trust where it came from.
Keep your security software and system updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Antivirus results
0 of 61 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 61
- No result 14
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Not applicable
- First seen 26d ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
2 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
None of the 61 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this JPEG image, including all major antivirus engines that returned a result. It is a non-executable image with no matching rules or threat-intelligence hits. It is rarely seen and was not run in a sandbox, but nothing in the evidence points to a threat.
None of the 61 antivirus engines that checked it detected the file, and 17 major antivirus engines reported it as undetected. The file is a JPEG image, so code signing does not apply and its absence means nothing here. No rule-based rules fired, and no external threat-intelligence source matched the hash. No sandbox run or host-reputation check is available, so we cannot describe behaviour in the test run. The file is rare, with a single submitter, which limits reputation context but adds no hostile evidence.
What We Detected
None of the 61 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this JPEG image. Major antivirus engines such as Kaspersky, ESET, Microsoft and BitDefender reported nothing. No rule-based rules or threat-intelligence matches were recorded.
Threat Behavior
No sandbox execution is available for this file, so no behaviour in the test run was observed. Static evidence shows an ordinary image file type with no embedded-threat detections. The file has a single submitter, so reputation history is thin.
What To Do Now
The image can be opened normally in an up-to-date image viewer. Keep your antivirus enabled and your software patched. If the file came from an unexpected source, check that its extension matches its content before opening it.
Where this verdict could be wrong1 caveat
- The image has been seen by only one submitter and has no the test run, so a crafted image targeting a specific viewer flaw cannot be fully excluded, though no engine detected anything of the kind.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 61 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file.
- All major antivirus engines that returned a result reported it as undetected.
- It is a non-executable JPEG image.
- No rule-based rules or threat-intelligence matches were recorded.
- The file is rare and has been submitted by only one source.
- No sandbox run is available to observe how the file behaves.
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 2 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
Technical details
None of the 61 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 2 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- File name
- Image
- Format
- JPEG
- Size
- 2.0 MB
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Last analyzed
- Oct 17, 2026, 7:02 AM UTC
- SHA-256
71762d0c635edc89604084ea49a244c5d6fb038a6c0250ae225fd69ec0176d56- SHA-1
0a34fe6a3d79f22b51f0f90c9d947e28ad65a3c5- MD5
fdc47d3ee0b50753f92c0b6e4aae40f0
First scanned
Antivirus consensus
0 of 61 engines flagged this file
14 of the 75 engines returned no result for this file (file type not supported, or the scan did not finish), so they did not check it.
- Tier-118 engines0flagged
- Tier-233 engines0flagged
- Low-trust10 engines0flagged
View all 75 engine results
- AcronisClean
- AhnLab-V3Clean
- AlibabaNo result
- alibabacloudNo result
- ALYacClean
- Antiy-AVLClean
- APEXNo result
- ArcabitClean
- AvastClean
- Avast-MobileNo result
- AVGClean
- AviraClean
- BitDefenderClean
- BitDefenderFalxNo result
- BkavClean
- CAT-QuickHealClean
- ClamAVClean
- CMCClean
- CrowdStrikeClean
- CTXClean
- CylanceNo result
- CynetClean
- DeepInstinctNo result
- DrWebClean
- ElasticNo result
- EmsisoftClean
- ESET-NOD32Clean
- F-SecureClean
- FortinetClean
- GDataClean
- GoogleClean
- GridinsoftClean
- huorongClean
- IkarusClean
- JiangminClean
- K7AntiVirusClean
- K7GWClean
- KasperskyClean
- KingsoftClean
- LionicClean
- MalwarebytesClean
- MaxSecureClean
- McAfeeDClean
- MicrosoftClean
- MicroWorld-eScanClean
- NANO-AntivirusClean
- PaloaltoNo result
- PandaClean
- RisingClean
- SangforClean
- SentinelOneClean
- SkyhighClean
- SophosClean
- SUPERAntiSpywareClean
- SymantecClean
- SymantecMobileInsightNo result
- TACHYONClean
- tehtrisNo result
- TencentClean
- TrapmineNo result
- TrellixENSClean
- TrendMicroClean
- TrendMicro-HouseCallClean
- TrustlookNo result
- VaristClean
- VBA32Clean
- VIPREClean
- VirITClean
- ViRobotClean
- WebrootNo result
- XcitiumClean
- YandexClean
- ZillyaClean
- ZoneAlarmClean
- ZonerClean
How widely this file has been seen
Rarely uploaded, and first seen more than two weeks ago. Often niche legitimate software or internal tooling; not a strong malware signal on its own.
Chapter 04
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is this image safe?
What is this image?
How many antivirus engines detected this image?
What is the SHA-256 hash of this image?
Is it safe to open this image?
How up to date is this analysis of this image?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.