Is Improved Camera SE-93962-1-1-2-1757468263 (1).7z safe?
Single low-trust engine flags a 359-day-old 7-Zip archive with no tier-1 support.
Only one low-trust engine (Rising) reports PUA.GameHack on this 7-Zip file; all 16 tier-1 engines are silent. Medium prevalence and 359-day history further reduce risk.
720cfccedc3873880e…82f7c124f1166fRecommended next actions
Before opening or extracting
Open or extract it only when its sender or download source has been independently verified.
If you already opened or extracted it
Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
Only one low-trust engine (Rising) reports PUA.GameHack on this 7-Zip file; all 16 tier-1 engines are silent. Medium prevalence and 359-day history further reduce risk.
The detection pattern matches the classic low-trust-only false-positive shape: 1/75 engines, tier1Malicious=0, onlyLowTrustFlagging=true. The file is a 7-Zip archive containing a PE, carries a portable filename, and shows no sandbox, signing, or external-intel corroboration. Medium prevalence across 66 submitters over nearly a year adds weight to a benign classification.
What We Detected
One low-trust engine (Rising) labels the archive PUA.GameHack!8.223 (CLOUD). All tier-1 engines (Avast, AVG, Avira, BitDefender, DrWeb, Emsisoft, ESET-NOD32, F-Secure, Fortinet, GData, Kaspersky, Microsoft) report clean. No sandbox execution data, no dropped children, and no external-intel hits from CIRCL, MalwareBazaar, or YARAify.
Threat Behavior
Static evidence only; no runtime observations available. The archive is 359 days old with medium prevalence (66 submitters, 82 submissions) and carries a portable-style filename. No code-signing applies to 7-Zip archives.
What To Do Now
Keep endpoint protection enabled. If the archive is from an untrusted source, scan its extracted contents with current signatures before execution.
- 16 tier-1 engines clean
- medium prevalence over 359 days
- no external-intel hits
The file can be considered safe for normal use; continue to scan extracted contents with up-to-date protection.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete1 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 1 / 75engines flagged
- 66sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
No completed runtime observation is available for this file.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceRuntime coverageObserved at - 02
1 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file, including Rising.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 03
The hash has been submitted 82 times from 66 sources.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
1 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- Improved Camera SE-93962-1-1-2-1757468263 (1).7z
- Format
- 7ZIP
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 4.4 MB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 4, 2026, 8:08 AM UTC
720cfccedc3873880e76f4bf1f2b79971d704c274f4dd3b52482f7c124f1166fSafety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.
- Recovery step 01
Open or extract it only when its sender or download source has been independently verified.
- Recovery step 02
A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.
- Recovery step 03
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is Improved Camera SE-93962-1-1-2-1757468263 (1).7z safe?
What is Improved Camera SE-93962-1-1-2-1757468263 (1).7z?
How many antivirus engines detected Improved Camera SE-93962-1-1-2-1757468263 (1).7z?
What is the SHA-256 hash of Improved Camera SE-93962-1-1-2-1757468263 (1).7z?
Is it safe to open or extract Improved Camera SE-93962-1-1-2-1757468263 (1).7z?
How up to date is this analysis of Improved Camera SE-93962-1-1-2-1757468263 (1).7z?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.