Is 1.png safe?
No antivirus engine detected a threat in this established PNG, and available external intelligence provides no evidence linking the file to malware.
All 74 antivirus engines returned no malicious or suspicious detection, including 17 tier-1 engines. The PNG has also circulated for 723 days without a threat-intelligence match, although no completed runtime observation was available.
76e86bef4bfaf0e941…8d4140636da5f1Recommended next actions
Before viewing
View it only when its sender or download source is one you trust.
If you already viewed it
Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
All 74 antivirus engines returned no malicious or suspicious detection, including 17 tier-1 engines. The PNG has also circulated for 723 days without a threat-intelligence match, although no completed runtime observation was available.
The strongest evidence is unanimous: 0 of 74 engines flagged the file, with all 17 participating tier-1 engines reporting no detection. The sample is a PNG, so code-signing evidence does not apply. It has been known for 723 days and submitted 39 times by 35 sources, reducing concern that it is an untested new sample. MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL supplied no corroborating threat match. No sandbox execution or complete contacted-host reputation result is available, so the conclusion rests on static scanning, prevalence, and external intelligence rather than observed runtime behavior.
What We Detected
None of the 74 antivirus engines marked the PNG as malicious or suspicious. This includes 17 tier-1 engines, with BitDefender, ESET-NOD32, Kaspersky, and Microsoft among those reporting no detection. MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL also returned no matching threat intelligence.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox observation was supplied, so no claims can be made about runtime behavior. The file is identified as a PNG, and code signing is not relevant to this format. No dropped malicious child was reported, but a complete contacted-host reputation check was not available.
What To Do Now
The available evidence does not indicate malware. Keep endpoint protection enabled and open the image only with an updated image viewer, particularly if it came from an unfamiliar sender or unexpected download.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- behaviour=null, so there is no completed runtime observation to confirm how applications process the image.
- contactedHosts=null, meaning no complete host-reputation result is available; however, no runtime network contacts were supplied for review.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/74 engines reported a malicious or suspicious detection.
- engines.tier1ReportedClean=17 and engines.tier1Malicious=0.
- externalIntel.malwareBazaar.hit=false and externalIntel.yaraify.ruleCount=0.
- Observed for 723 days across 35 sources and 39 submissions.
- brandMismatch.detected is not present and no heuristics fired.
- No completed runtime observation is available.
- No complete contacted-host reputation result is available.
The file can be handled as an ordinary image based on the available evidence. Keep security software enabled and use an updated image viewer.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 74 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 0 / 74engines flagged
- 35sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
0 of 74 antivirus engines flagged the file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
No completed runtime observation is available for this file.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceRuntime coverageObserved at - 03
The hash has been submitted 39 times from 35 sources.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
0 of 74 engines flagged this file
View all 74 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- 1.png
- Format
- PNG
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 5.2 MB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 19, 2026, 1:44 PM UTC
76e86bef4bfaf0e94122ede63dca7dacccb8f0d50af44646538d4140636da5f1Safety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.
- Recovery step 01
View it only when its sender or download source is one you trust.
- Recovery step 02
A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.
- Recovery step 03
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is 1.png safe?
What is 1.png?
How many antivirus engines detected 1.png?
What is the SHA-256 hash of 1.png?
Is it safe to view 1.png?
How up to date is this analysis of 1.png?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.