Threat LensFile scan report

Is 1.png safe?

Verdict
Safe

No antivirus engine detected a threat in this established PNG, and available external intelligence provides no evidence linking the file to malware.

All 74 antivirus engines returned no malicious or suspicious detection, including 17 tier-1 engines. The PNG has also circulated for 723 days without a threat-intelligence match, although no completed runtime observation was available.

View with normal care

The file can be handled as an ordinary image based on the available evidence. Keep security software enabled and use an updated image viewer.

Read the full analysis
Saved file evidenceAntivirus consensus
0of 74 flagged
Flagged 0No detection 74
Digital specimen1.png76e86bef4bfaf0e941…8d4140636da5f1
Size5.2 MB
Code signingNot applicable
SandboxPartial coverage
First seen2y ago
Evidence3 priority signals
0 of 74 antivirus engines flagged the file.

Recommended next actions

01

Before viewing

View it only when its sender or download source is one you trust.

02

If you already viewed it

Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.

Chapter 02

Intelligence

The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.

MT AI Engine · Verdict analysis

The reasoning behind this verdict

This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.

96%Confidence
Very high
Analyst conclusion

All 74 antivirus engines returned no malicious or suspicious detection, including 17 tier-1 engines. The PNG has also circulated for 723 days without a threat-intelligence match, although no completed runtime observation was available.

Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
  • behaviour=null, so there is no completed runtime observation to confirm how applications process the image.
  • contactedHosts=null, meaning no complete host-reputation result is available; however, no runtime network contacts were supplied for review.

These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.

Recommended action

The file can be handled as an ordinary image based on the available evidence. Keep security software enabled and use an updated image viewer.

Scan transparency

Coverage & freshness

3 of 5 complete

Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.

  • Antivirus

    Complete

    0 of 74 engines flagged the file.

  • Sandbox

    Partial

    Runtime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.

  • Network

    Not run

    No contacted-host reputation check is recorded.

    No timestamp recorded
  • YARA

    Complete

    Rule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.

  • External intel

    Complete

    3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.

Chapter 03

Behavior

Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.

Chapter 04

Detection & Forensics

Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.

Chapter 05

Safety & FAQ

Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.

What to do now

This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.

  1. Recovery step 01

    View it only when its sender or download source is one you trust.

  2. Recovery step 02

    A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.

  3. Recovery step 03

    Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.

Safety FAQ

Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.

6 evidence-based answers
Is 1.png safe?
Evidence-based answer
1.png appears safe. 0 of 74 antivirus engines flagged it. View it only when its sender or download source is one you trust.
What is 1.png?
Evidence-based answer
1.png is a media file, about 5.2 MB. Our analysis did not identify a verdict-driving threat signal. A file's name can be reused by different files, so we identify it by its cryptographic hash (below).
How many antivirus engines detected 1.png?
Evidence-based answer
None — 0 of 74 antivirus engines flagged 1.png. That's reassuring, though it is not proof that a file is safe, so we also weigh its behaviour, identity, and reputation.
What is the SHA-256 hash of 1.png?
Evidence-based answer
The SHA-256 hash of 1.png is 76e86bef4bfaf0e94122ede63dca7dacccb8f0d50af44646538d4140636da5f1, and its MD5 is 731ddae92d86dc8828ce13b9a8d3a80c. This hash is the file's unique fingerprint — two files with the same SHA-256 are identical. Use it to confirm you're looking at exactly this file (not just one with the same name) when comparing against antivirus databases or a download's published checksum.
Is it safe to view 1.png?
Evidence-based answer
Based on the recorded evidence, 1.png has a low observed risk. The important caveat is source: make sure you downloaded it from the official website or a trusted store, because attackers sometimes distribute malware-laced copies under a legitimate file's name. If your own antivirus flags it, verify the source and the exact hash before overriding the warning.
How up to date is this analysis of 1.png?
Evidence-based answer
This report reflects the scan run on September 19, 2026. Because a file's hash never changes, the identity of 1.png is fixed — but antivirus coverage improves over time, so a file that looks clean today can pick up detections later (and vice-versa). If you need the latest picture, MalwareTips staff can re-run the analysis from scratch.
Chapter 06

Community

Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.

The raw file is processed temporarily and is not retained after processing. Its hash and report are public and permanent, so the next person who checks the same file gets an instant answer. Unknown files may be submitted to VirusTotal for analysis. If you ran this file on your computer and are worried, scan your system with an up-to-date antivirus and change critical passwords from a different device.