File scan report
Verdict Suspicious
Is Lulu Notes_ Setup. exe safe? Treat it as suspicious.
Unsigned NSIS installer with one detection from a major antivirus engine and no sandbox malice.
Why Suspicious? 4 antivirus engines flag it; nothing else confirms it.
Limited evidence · One sign points to a problem; nothing else confirms it.
Treat as suspicious; do not run without additional verification or a signed build from the publisher.
What to do now4 steps
Some signs point to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful. Treat it with caution.
What to do
Don't install it unless you're sure where it came from.
Check where you got it: an unexpected attachment, a link someone sent you or a re-upload is a red flag.
If you can't confirm where it came from, delete it. If you need the program, download it again from the publisher's own website.
If you already installed it
Stop using it, run a full scan with your antivirus and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts.
Not sure what to do?
Ask the MalwareTips community before you run it. If you already ran it, follow the cleanup guide.
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
4 of 70 flagged
- Flagged 4
- No detection 66
- No result 5
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 2mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 3 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
Four of the 70 antivirus engines that checked it flag the file, one of them major. The sample is unsigned, shows only routine behaviour, and matches an import-table fingerprint previously seen in safe verdicts.
The one detection from a major antivirus engine (Ikarus) is offset by 16 other major antivirus engines reporting clean. No sandbox malice, no dropped malicious files it created, and no external-intel corroboration exist. The unsigned state and installer nature keep the file in mixed-signals territory rather than safe or malicious.
What We Detected
Four engines (Ikarus major, Gridinsoft, Malwarebytes, Google) report malicious labels; the remaining 66 engines are silent. The file is an unsigned NSIS installer with high-entropy overlay but no packers detected.
Threat Behavior
Sandbox execution produced only techniques common in legitimate software and one privilege-related call (T1134). no complete contacted-host reputation result was available, no malicious files it created, and no persistence indicators were observed.
What To Do Now
Keep security software enabled. If the file is not required, delete it or obtain a signed copy from the vendor. Monitor any further detections from additional engines.
- 16 major antivirus engines clean
- no sandbox malice
- no dropped malicious files it created
- unsigned executable
- major detection present
- newly prevalent installer
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 18sandbox rule tags
- 2spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 25filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Contains packed or scrambled code that is harder to inspect (common in installers too).
Moderate concern: Ran commands or a script on the test computer.
Note: Read the user name of the test computer.
Note: Listed the programs running on the test computer.
Note: Read basic details of the test computer, such as its Windows version.
Note: Looked through folders on the test computer (most installers do this).
Note: Loaded extra code modules while running.
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as contacting a server, but no contacted host was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as setting up auto-start; no auto-start entry was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as changing how Windows loads code; nothing confirms it.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 5: FileSeen in the test run
LuluNotes_Setup.exe
7974a0dfe74495e6aa37253d9ca8cd846210d5bf742e664f2b05c71d06b17fe6
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
setup.exe
"C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\setup.exe"
Test run - Evidence 3 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
setup.exe
"C:\Users\user\Desktop\setup.exe"
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Files
Created or changed
- Evidence 4 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
System.dll
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\nsuC97B.tmp\System.dll
Test run - Evidence 5 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
Nsis7z.dll
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\nsuC97B.tmp\Nsis7z.dll
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
5 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
Includes 18 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 1 dropped file.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
4 of the 70 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 4
- Ikarus (major engine)Trojan-Downloader.NSIS.Lulu
- GoogleDetected
- GridinsoftTrojan.Win32.MediaArena.bot
- MalwarebytesTrojan.MediaArena
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Aug 30, 2026, 11:09 PM UTC
- SHA-256
7974a0dfe74495e6aa37253d9ca8cd846210d5bf742e664f2b05c71d06b17fe6- SHA-1
48f797bf5717098cd3952e0ed8b76280938464e5- MD5
f1b692f48de3827074d944b24803e896
About this file
LuluNotes_Setup.exe is a Win32 EXE file of 2.7 MB.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 2.7 MB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Aug 3, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 247 distinct sources
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 8.00 of 8
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), PE section entropy and packers and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is LuluNotes_Setup.exe safe, or is it malware?
What is LuluNotes_Setup.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected LuluNotes_Setup.exe?
What should I do if I already installed LuluNotes_Setup.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of LuluNotes_Setup.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of LuluNotes_Setup.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.